scholarly journals Analysis of Cell Cycle Progression in the Budding Yeast S. cerevisiae

2021 ◽  
pp. 265-276
Author(s):  
Deniz Pirincci Ercan ◽  
Frank Uhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Substrate Phosphorylation

AbstractThe cell cycle is an ordered series of events by which cells grow and divide to give rise to two daughter cells. In eukaryotes, cyclin–cyclin-dependent kinase (cyclin–Cdk) complexes act as master regulators of the cell division cycle by phosphorylating numerous substrates. Their activity and expression profiles are regulated in time. The budding yeast S. cerevisiae was one of the pioneering model organisms to study the cell cycle. Its genetic amenability continues to make it a favorite model to decipher the principles of how changes in cyclin-Cdk activity translate into the intricate sequence of substrate phosphorylation events that govern the cell cycle. In this chapter, we introduce robust and straightforward methods to analyze cell cycle progression in S. cerevisiae. These techniques can be utilized to describe cell cycle events and to address the effects of perturbations on accurate and timely cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Budding yeast relies on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression with morphogenetic development

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. eabg0007
Author(s):  
Deniz Pirincci Ercan ◽  
Florine Chrétien ◽  
Probir Chakravarty ◽  
Helen R. Flynn ◽  
Ambrosius P. Snijders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Quantitative Model ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Model Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin ◽  
Substrate Phosphorylation ◽  
The Cost

Two models have been put forward for cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) control of the cell cycle. In the qualitative model, cell cycle events are ordered by distinct substrate specificities of successive cyclin waves. Alternatively, in the quantitative model, the gradual rise of Cdk activity from G1 phase to mitosis leads to ordered substrate phosphorylation at sequential thresholds. Here, we study the relative contributions of qualitative and quantitative Cdk control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. All S phase and mitotic cyclins can be replaced by a single mitotic cyclin, albeit at the cost of reduced fitness. A single cyclin can also replace all G1 cyclins to support ordered cell cycle progression, fulfilling key predictions of the quantitative model. However, single-cyclin cells fail to polarize or grow buds and thus cannot survive. Our results suggest that budding yeast has become dependent on G1 cyclin specificity to couple cell cycle progression to essential morphogenetic events.

scholarly journals An organelle inheritance pathway during polarized cell growth

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn W Li ◽  
Ross TA Pedersen ◽  
Michelle S Lu ◽  
David G Drubin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Organelle Inheritance ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Signaling

AbstractSome organelles cannot be synthesized anew, so they are segregated into daughter cells during cell division. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, daughter cells bud from mother cells and are populated by organelles inherited from the mothers. To determine whether this organelle inheritance occurs in a stereotyped manner, we tracked organelles using fluorescence microscopy. We describe a program for organelle inheritance in budding yeast. The cortical endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and peroxisomes are inherited concomitant with bud emergence. Next, vacuoles are inherited in small buds, followed closely by mitochondria. Finally, the nucleus and perinuclear ER are inherited when buds have nearly reached their maximal size. Because organelle inheritance timing correlates with bud morphology, which is coupled to the cell cycle, we tested whether organelle inheritance order is controlled by the cell cycle. By arresting cell cycle progression but allowing continued bud growth, we determined that organelle inheritance still occurs without cell cycle progression past S-phase, and that the general inheritance order is maintained. Thus, organelle inheritance follows a preferred order during polarized cell division, but it is not controlled exclusively by cell cycle signaling.Summary statementOrganelles are interconnected by contact sites, but they must be inherited from mother cells into buds during budding yeast mitosis. We report that this process occurs in a preferred sequence.

scholarly journals The FACT complex and cell cycle progression are essential to maintain asymmetric transcription factor partitioning during cell division

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Herrero ◽  
Sonia Stinus ◽  
Eleanor Bellows ◽  
Peter H Thorpe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Reverse Genetic Screen

AbstractThe polarized partitioning of proteins in cells underlies asymmetric cell division, which is an important driver of development and cellular diversity. Like most cells, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae divides asymmetrically to give two distinct daughter cells. This asymmetry mimics that seen in metazoans and the key regulatory proteins are conserved from yeast to human. A well-known example of an asymmetric protein is the transcription factor Ace2, which localizes specifically to the daughter nucleus, where it drives a daughter-specific transcriptional network. We performed a reverse genetic screen to look for regulators of asymmetry based on the Ace2 localization phenotype. We screened a collection of essential genes in order to analyze the effect of core cellular processes in asymmetric cell division. This identified a large number of mutations that are known to affect progression through the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle delay is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry. To test this model we blocked cells from progressing through mitosis and found that prolonged cell cycle arrest is sufficient to disrupt Ace2 asymmetry after release. We also demonstrate that members of the evolutionary conserved FACT chromatin-remodeling complex are required for both asymmetric and cell cycle-regulated localization of Ace2.

scholarly journals The Gcn2 Regulator Yih1 Interacts with the Cyclin Dependent Kinase Cdc28 and Promotes Cell Cycle Progression through G2/M in Budding Yeast

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0131070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Silva ◽  
Martina Dautel ◽  
Bruno M. Di Genova ◽  
David C. Amberg ◽  
Beatriz A. Castilho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression

scholarly journals Coordinating cell polarity and cell cycle progression: what can we learn from flies and worms?

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 130083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Noatynska ◽  
Nicolas Tavernier ◽  
Monica Gotta ◽  
Lionel Pintard
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Cycle Progression

Spatio-temporal coordination of events during cell division is crucial for animal development. In recent years, emerging data have strengthened the notion that tight coupling of cell cycle progression and cell polarity in dividing cells is crucial for asymmetric cell division and ultimately for metazoan development. Although it is acknowledged that such coupling exists, the molecular mechanisms linking the cell cycle and cell polarity machineries are still under investigation. Key cell cycle regulators control cell polarity, and thus influence cell fate determination and/or differentiation, whereas some factors involved in cell polarity regulate cell cycle timing and proliferation potential. The scope of this review is to discuss the data linking cell polarity and cell cycle progression, and the importance of such coupling for asymmetric cell division. Because studies in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have started to reveal the molecular mechanisms of this coordination, we will concentrate on these two systems. We review examples of molecular mechanisms suggesting a coupling between cell polarity and cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals DNA replication and mitotic entry: A brake model for cell cycle progression

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (12) ◽  
pp. 3892-3902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennie Lemmens ◽  
Arne Lindqvist
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cycle Model ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Core Function ◽  
A Cell

The core function of the cell cycle is to duplicate the genome and divide the duplicated DNA into two daughter cells. These processes need to be carefully coordinated, as cell division before DNA replication is complete leads to genome instability and cell death. Recent observations show that DNA replication, far from being only a consequence of cell cycle progression, plays a key role in coordinating cell cycle activities. DNA replication, through checkpoint kinase signaling, restricts the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that promote cell division. The S/G2 transition is therefore emerging as a crucial regulatory step to determine the timing of mitosis. Here we discuss recent observations that redefine the coupling between DNA replication and cell division and incorporate these insights into an updated cell cycle model for human cells. We propose a cell cycle model based on a single trigger and sequential releases of three molecular brakes that determine the kinetics of CDK activation.

scholarly journals Mathematical model of the morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1243-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ciliberto ◽  
Bela Novak ◽  
John J. Tyson
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Bud Formation ◽  
Control Signals ◽  
Potent Inhibition ◽  
Morphogenesis Checkpoint ◽  
Size Threshold

The morphogenesis checkpoint in budding yeast delays progression through the cell cycle in response to stimuli that prevent bud formation. Central to the checkpoint mechanism is Swe1 kinase: normally inactive, its activation halts cell cycle progression in G2. We propose a molecular network for Swe1 control, based on published observations of budding yeast and analogous control signals in fission yeast. The proposed Swe1 network is merged with a model of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation, converted into a set of differential equations and studied by numerical simulation. The simulations accurately reproduce the phenotypes of a dozen checkpoint mutants. Among other predictions, the model attributes a new role to Hsl1, a kinase known to play a role in Swe1 degradation: Hsl1 must also be indirectly responsible for potent inhibition of Swe1 activity. The model supports the idea that the morphogenesis checkpoint, like other checkpoints, raises the cell size threshold for progression from one phase of the cell cycle to the next.

Cell cycle-dependent control of polarised development by a cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein in theFucuszygote

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (21) ◽  
pp. 4383-4392
Author(s):  
Florence Corellou ◽  
Colin Brownlee ◽  
Bernard Kloareg ◽  
François-Yves Bouget
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Purine Derivatives ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Iterative Development ◽  
Simultaneous Control ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
The Relationship

Although iterative development can be uncoupled from morphogenesis in plant organs, the relationship between the cell cycle and developmental events is not well established in embryos. Zygotes of fucoid algae, including Fucus and Pelvetia are particularly well suited for studying the interaction(s) between cell cycle progression and the early morphogenetic events, as the establishment of polarity and its morphogenetic expression, i.e. germination, and the first cell cycle are concomitant. We have previously demonstrated that, in Fucus zygotes, various aspects of cell cycle progression are tightly controlled by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-like proteins, including two PSTAIRE CDK-like proteins, p34 and p32, which are synthesised after fertilisation. We show that specific inhibition of CDK-like proteins, either with purine derivatives such as olomoucine and amino-purvalanol or by microinjection of the CDK inhibitor p21cip1, prevents germination and cell division. Whereas direct inhibition of DNA replication by aphidicolin did not affect polarised development, olomoucine, which has previously been shown to prevent entry in S phase, and other purine derivatives also inhibited photopolarisation. Early microinjection of a monoclonal anti-PSTAIRE antibody also prevented germination and cell division. Only p34 had affinity for amino-purvalanol, suggesting that among PSTAIRE CDKs, this protein is the main target of purine derivatives. Models to account for the simultaneous control of early cell cycle progression and polarisation are proposed.

scholarly journals DNA Damage Checkpoints Inhibit Mitotic Exit by Two Different Mechanisms

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 5067-5078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengshan Liang ◽  
Yanchang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Early Anaphase

ABSTRACT Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) governs cell cycle progression, and its kinase activity fluctuates during the cell cycle. Mitotic exit pathways are responsible for the inactivation of CDK after chromosome segregation by promoting the release of a nucleolus-sequestered phosphatase, Cdc14, which antagonizes CDK. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitotic exit is controlled by the FEAR (for “Cdc-fourteen early anaphase release”) and mitotic exit network (MEN) pathways. In response to DNA damage, two branches of the DNA damage checkpoint, Chk1 and Rad53, are activated in budding yeast to prevent anaphase entry and mitotic exit, allowing cells more time to repair damaged DNA. Here we present evidence indicating that yeast cells negatively regulate mitotic exit through two distinct pathways in response to DNA damage. Rad53 prevents mitotic exit by inhibiting the MEN pathway, whereas the Chk1 pathway prevents FEAR pathway-dependent Cdc14 release in the presence of DNA damage. In contrast to previous data, the Rad53 pathway negatively regulates MEN independently of Cdc5, a Polo-like kinase essential for mitotic exit. Instead, a defective Rad53 pathway alleviates the inhibition of MEN by Bfa1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document