scholarly journals Dialysis-related carpal tunnel syndrome in the past 40 years

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Hatano ◽  
Izuru Kitajima ◽  
Seizo Yamamoto ◽  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Kazuya Isawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
The Past ◽  
Period 2 ◽  
Dialysis Vintage ◽  
Multivariable Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Extension ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Significant Factors

Abstract Purpose and method Patients on hemodialysis develop carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) due to an accumulation of dialysis-related β2 microglobulin (β2m) amyloid (DRA). In Japan, dialysis technology has progressed remarkably in the past 40 years and has increased the time until patients require surgery for CTS. However, unclear is whether the time from the start of hemodialysis to the first surgery for CTS is associated with β2m clearance by the different hemodialysis techniques. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated β2m clearance, serum β2m levels, and the change in the length of this period in patients across 4 periods according to the year that first surgery for CTS was performed: period 1, 1982–1989; period 2, 1990–1999; period 3, 2000–2009; and period 4, 2010–2019. Result A total of 222 patients who met the selection criteria were included. Mean β2m clearance was −1.8 ± 16.7% in period 1, and improved to 65.4 ± 8.6% in period 3. Accordingly, the serum β2m value after hemodialysis decreased significantly. The time from the start of hemodialysis to the first surgery for CTS was 12.4 ± 2.9 years in period 1 but increased to 21.8 ± 6.3 years in period 3. In multivariable linear regression analysis, the significant factors contributing to β2m clearance were periods 2, 3, and 4. In particular, the relation between removal of β2m and the extension of the dialysis vintage in period 1 and 2 was remarkable compared with periods 3 and 4. Conclusion Our findings indicate that improvement of β2m clearance via advances in dialysis technology might result in a significant extension in the time between starting HD and the first surgery for CTS.

Carpal tunnel syndrome: matching minimally invasive surgical techniques

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittoria Nazzi ◽  
Angelo Franzini ◽  
Giuseppe Messina ◽  
Giovanni Broggi
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
The Past ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Group A ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Group B

✓In the past few years, several different minimally invasive surgical techniques have been proposed to decompress the median nerve at the wrist. Use of these techniques has become widespread due to fewer local complications, faster functional recovery, and reduced surgical time. In this paper the authors compare 3 different minimally invasive surgical techniques used at their institution in the past 13 years. Between January 1994 and January 2007, 891 patients underwent 1272 surgeries at the authors' institution for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), for which a minimally invasive technique was used. In 473 cases (Group A), the transillumination technique with a single wrist incision and a “carpalotome” (a modified Paine retinaculotome) was used; in 216 cases (Group B), transillumination was abandoned and a single linear wrist incision for access with the carpalotome was performed; and in 583 cases (Group C), the techniques were further modified by making a second incision in the palm using the carpalotome. All 3 groups of patients were homogeneous for age, sex, and duration of the symptomatology. In 90% of the patients in Group A, in 88% of those in Group B, and 99.8% of patients in Group C, complete remission of symptoms was obtained. Due to persistence of symptoms, 44 patients in Group A, 24 in Group B, and only 1 in Group C underwent a repeated operation with the open technique. The only surgical complication requiring repeated operation of the 1272 operations was a lesion of the primitive median artery (1 patient in Group C). The technique of median nerve decompression at the wrist that was used for patients in Group C represents a valid alternative for treatment of CTS.

scholarly journals Socioeconomic factors predicting outcome in surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome: a national registry-based study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malin Zimmerman ◽  
Evelina Hall ◽  
Katarina Steen Carlsson ◽  
Erika Nyman ◽  
Lars B. Dahlin
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Sick Leave ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Social Assistance ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Immigrant Status ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

AbstractThe study aimed to investigate socioeconomic factors in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to evaluate their impact on outcome following open carpal tunnel release (OCTR). Data from the National Quality Register for Hand Surgery were combined with socioeconomic data (marital status, education level, earnings, migrant status, occupation, sick leave, unemployment, and social assistance) from Statistics Sweden to evaluate OCTRs performed from 2010 to 2016 (total 10,746 OCTRs). Patients completed QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaires preoperatively (n = 3597) and at three (n = 2824) and 12 months (n = 2037) postoperatively. The effect of socioeconomic factors on QuickDASH scores was analyzed with linear regression analysis. Socioeconomically deprived patients scored higher on the QuickDASH on all occasions than patients with higher socioeconomic status. Being widowed, having a low education level, low earnings, immigrant status, frequent sick leave and dependence on social assistance all increased the postoperative QuickDASH score at 12 months. The change in total score for QuickDASH between preoperative and 12 months postoperatively did not vary between the groups. We conclude that such factors as being widowed, having a lower education level, low earnings, immigrant status, frequent sick leave and social assistance dependence are associated with more symptoms both before and after OCTR for CTS, but these factors do not affect the relative improvement in QuickDASH.

scholarly journals Association between the catechol-o-methyltransferase val158met polymorphism with susceptibility and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Erkol İnal ◽  
P Eroğlu ◽  
O Görükmez ◽  
Ş Özemri Sağ ◽  
T Yakut
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
The Past ◽  
Pcr Rflp ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity. In this study, we aimed to clarify the relationships between the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene Val158Met (rs4680) polymorphism and development, functional and clinical status of CTS. Ninety-five women with electro diagnostically confirmed CTS and 95 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. The functional and clinical status of the patients was measured by the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire and intensity of pain related to the past 2 weeks was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS). The Val158Met polymorphism was determined using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), method. We divided patients according to the genotypes of the Val158Met polymorphism as Val/Val, Val/Met and Met/Met. There were not any significant differences in terms of Val158Met polymorphisms between patients and healthy controls (p >0.05). We also did not find any relationships between the Val158Met polymorphism and CTS (p >0.05). In conclusion, although we did not find any relationships between CTS and the Val158Met polymorphism, we could not generalize this result to the general population. Future studies are warranted to conclude precise associations.

Clinical Update: Assessing Maximum Medical Improvement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Medical Evaluation ◽  
Nerve Recovery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.

Clinical Update: Understanding Causation: An Example Using Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Anatomic Structure ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Compensation Systems ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Four Levels

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document