Design information extraction from construction specifications to support cost estimation

2021 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 103835
Author(s):  
Temitope Akanbi ◽  
Jiansong Zhang
Author(s):  
Chaeyeon Lim ◽  
Donghoon Lee ◽  
Won-Kee Hong ◽  
Sunkuk Kim

The project participants, including clients, architects, structural engineers and contractors would want to know accurate construction costs as soon as the design is completed. However, it may take at least several weeks for the cost estimation after the structural design and drawings are completed, depending on the project scale or size. Quantity surveying in manual is time-consuming and taken by lots of effort. Even if computerized software is used, it takes a lot of time to insert structural design information to the software. In addition, the estimated cost may result in inaccurate quantity owing to the drawing errors or quantity surveyors’ mistake, as well as it is not an exact quantity for actual construction, exposing numerous problems at the construction phase. For instance, to accurately estimate the quantity of rebar, some additional effort is required such as preparing the bar bending schedule. Such problems occur by the communication gap and viewpoint difference among project participants who perform structural designs, draft the structural drawings and estimate quantity. But, if structural design information can be automatically received for quantity estimation, an exact quantity can be estimated without omission or errors. To solve those problems, this study proposes automatic estimation System of building frames integrated with structural design information (AutoES). Using the algorithms provided by AutoES, the task of cost estimation can be accomplished with an exact bill of quantity including a bar bending schedule without errors, mistakes, or omission within a week, which used to take at least 4 weeks.


TAPPI Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
HAKIM GHEZZAZ ◽  
LUC PELLETIER ◽  
PAUL R. STUART

The evaluation and process risk assessment of (a) lignin precipitation from black liquor, and (b) the near-neutral hemicellulose pre-extraction for recovery boiler debottlenecking in an existing pulp mill is presented in Part I of this paper, which was published in the July 2012 issue of TAPPI Journal. In Part II, the economic assessment of the two biorefinery process options is presented and interpreted. A mill process model was developed using WinGEMS software and used for calculating the mass and energy balances. Investment costs, operating costs, and profitability of the two biorefinery options have been calculated using standard cost estimation methods. The results show that the two biorefinery options are profitable for the case study mill and effective at process debottlenecking. The after-tax internal rate of return (IRR) of the lignin precipitation process option was estimated to be 95%, while that of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process option was 28%. Sensitivity analysis showed that the after tax-IRR of the lignin precipitation process remains higher than that of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process option, for all changes in the selected sensitivity parameters. If we consider the after-tax IRR, as well as capital cost, as selection criteria, the results show that for the case study mill, the lignin precipitation process is more promising than the near-neutral hemicellulose pre-extraction process. However, the comparison between the two biorefinery options should include long-term evaluation criteria. The potential of high value-added products that could be produced from lignin in the case of the lignin precipitation process, or from ethanol and acetic acid in the case of the hemicellulose pre-extraction process, should also be considered in the selection of the most promising process option.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document