What do General Surgery Residents Operate During the Residency Program? An Analysis of the Applicability of the Specialty Program in General and Digestive Surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-158
Author(s):  
Eduardo Ma Targarona Soler ◽  
Jose Ma Jover Navalon ◽  
Javier Gutierrez Saiz ◽  
Víctor Turrado Rodríguez ◽  
Pascual Parrilla Paricio
2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Kurun Partap S Oberoi ◽  
Akia D Caine ◽  
Jacob Schwartzman ◽  
Sayeeda Rab ◽  
Amber L Turner ◽  
...  

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to receive milestone-based evaluations in key areas. Shortcomings of the traditional evaluation system (TES) are a low completion rate and delay in completion. We hypothesized that adoption of a mobile evaluation system (MES) would increase the number of evaluations completed and improve their timeliness. Methods Traditional evaluations for a general surgery residency program were converted into a web-based form via a widely available, free, and secure application and implemented in August 2017. After 8 months, MES data were analyzed and compared to that of our TES. Results 122 mobile evaluations were completed; 20% were solicited by residents. Introduction of the MES resulted in an increased number of evaluations per resident ( P = .0028) and proportion of faculty completing evaluations ( P = .0220). Timeliness also improved, with 71% of evaluations being completed during one’s clinical rotation. Conclusions A resident-driven MES is an inexpensive and effective method to augment traditional end-of-rotation evaluations.


Author(s):  
Sarah Lund ◽  
Taleen MacArthur ◽  
Jonie Keune ◽  
Teresa Enger ◽  
Jorys Martinez-Jorge ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryan Mortman ◽  
Harold A. Frazier ◽  
Yolanda C. Haywood

ABSTRACT Background Increasing diversity in medicine is receiving more attention yet underrepresented in medicine (UiM) surgeons remain a small fraction of all surgeons. Whether surgical training programs attempt to attract UiM applicants to their programs, and therefore their specialties, through program website information is unclear. Objective To analyze the scope of diversity and inclusion (D&I) related information on US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency program websites. Methods Residency programs were identified through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in July 2020. We searched surgical program websites and collected data on the presence or absence of variables labeled “diversity & inclusion” or “underrepresented in medicine.” Variables found on program websites as well as sites linked to the program website were included. We excluded programs identified in ERAS as fellowship training programs. Programs without webpages were also excluded. Results We identified 425 residency programs and excluded 22 from data analysis. Only 75 of the 403 included programs (18.6%) contained D&I-related information. The presence of individual variables was also low, ranging from 4.5% for opportunities related to early exposure to the specialty to 11.1% for a written or video statement of commitment to D&I. Conclusions In 2020, as recruitment and interviews moved entirely online, few US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency programs provided D&I-related information for residency applicants on their program websites.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria B.J. Chun ◽  
Keane G.M. Young ◽  
Andrea F. Honda ◽  
Gary F. Belcher ◽  
Gregory G. Maskarinec

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Watson ◽  
Timothy D. Flesher ◽  
Oscar Ruiz ◽  
Joshua S. Chung

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Stefanidis ◽  
Christina E. Acker ◽  
Dawn Swiderski ◽  
B. Todd Heniford ◽  
Frederick L. Greene

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document