Effect of sperm selection method by cumulus oophorus complexes and conventional sperm preparation method on sperm quality and DNA fragmentation for assisted reproduction techonology

Author(s):  
Wasin Naknam ◽  
Lingling Salang ◽  
Jen Sothornwit ◽  
Siriruthai Amnatbuddee ◽  
Kanok Seejorn ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Cabell. Vives ◽  
P Belchin ◽  
C Lopez-Fernandez ◽  
M Fernandez-Rubio ◽  
J Guerrero-Sanchez ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Is it useful to avoid sperm centrifugation in laboratory routine work to improve sperm quality and reproductive outcome in Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART)? Summary answer Exclusion of sperm centrifugation for sperm selection using neat sperm samples (IO-lix), increases sperm quality in the collected subpopulation decreasing miscarriage rate after using ICSI. What is known already Inclusion of sperm centrifugation in ART is an aggressive intervention for sperm selection with ineludible production iatrogenic damage affecting sperm integrity. The application of IMSI, PICSI or microfluidic devices avoid sperm centrifugation and may improve the quality of the subsample obtained. However, these methodologies may result time consuming, expensive or producing poor results when the quality of the sperm is limited. We have already shown that a modified swim-up avoiding centrifugation (called IO-lix) is a low-cost and efficient alternative to microfluidic devices, recovers 100 times more concentration and reduces sperm DNA fragmentation with no significant differences to other methodologies. Study design, size, duration This is a retrospective study from 2018 to 2020 which includes patients with an average of age of 38.2 years using their own oocytes with ICSI as fertilization technique. Two aleatory groups of patients were made: Group 1: 88 cycles with 503 fertilized oocytes and 206 blastocysts were obtained with sperm samples processed by IO-lix and Group 2: 303 cycles, 1451 fertilized oocytes and 591 blastocysts using a standard “swim up” technique to process sperm. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 391 ICSI cycles were included in this retrospective study. The male factor was similar in both groups and they showed altered SDF previously to the cycle. We compared data of the motility and SDF of sperm samples before and after applying IO-lix and we analyzed by X2 contingence test differences on miscarriage rates between groups 1 and 2. Main results and the role of chance General sperm parameter changes after IO-lix showed that averaged sperm concentration observed in neat ejaculated samples was 62M/SD=46.4. Values obtained after IO-lix in the same samples were 12.3M/SD8.0. Averaged sperm motility in neat samples was 54%/SD=9.3 and 70.9%/SD=13.2 after IO-lix. Finally, sperm DNA fragmentation in neat samples was 35.8%/SD17.3, while these values decreased to 9.2%/SD=3.9 after IO-lix. About reproductive outcome results, significant differences were not obtained on the development to blastocyst stage rate comparing both groups (X2=0.003; p value = 0.954; Alpha 0.05). In the case of IO-lix processed samples, the pregnancy rate was 59.42% in Group 1 and 44.72% in Group 2 (X2=0.651; p value =0.419; Alpha 0.05). A total of 9 miscarriages of 41 clinical pregnancies (21.95%) were observed after IO-lix, while this number increases to 59 out of 123 clinical pregnancies, which means the 47.96% of the embryo transfers, when “swim-up” was used. In this case significant differences were obtained (X2=3.935; p value = 0.0.047; Alpha 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution Being a pilot study aimed to understand the results of IO-lix in ART, correlations have not been stablished between the levels of sperm improvement after IO-lix and paired results of ART. This study would be necessary, specially to identify the possible origin of miscarriage associated to the male factor. Wider implications of the findings: Elimination of sperm centrifugation using a combined strategy of gradients and “swim-up” for sperm isolation, reduce miscarriage rate and produce equivalent results of blastocyst development to those obtained with “swim-up”. Being a cost-effective and improving laboratory workload, its use for sperm selection is recommended. Trial registration number Not applicable


Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (20) ◽  
pp. e3624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Muratori ◽  
Nicoletta Tarozzi ◽  
Marta Cambi ◽  
Luca Boni ◽  
Anna Lisa Iorio ◽  
...  

Reproduction ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Romero-Aguirregomezcorta ◽  
Ricardo Laguna-Barraza ◽  
Raúl Fernández-González ◽  
Miriama Štiavnická ◽  
Fabian Ward ◽  
...  

The objective of this work was to elucidate whether a sperm selection method that combines rheotaxis and microfluidics can improve the selection of spermatozoa over density gradient and swim-up. For this purpose human sperm selected by rheotaxis were compared against density gradient, swim-up and a control group of non-selected spermatozoa in split frozen-thawed (FT) and fresh (F) semen samples. Sperm quality was assessed in terms of motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), viability, acrosome integrity and membrane fluidity. Using a mouse model, we compared fertilisation and embryo development rates after performing ICSI with spermatozoa, sorted using rheotaxis or swim-up. Selection by rheotaxis yielded a sperm population with reduced DFI than the control (P < 0.05), improved normal morphology (P < 0.001) and higher total motility (TM; P < 0.001) than the other techniques studied in F and FT samples. Swim-up increased TM compared to density gradient and control in FT or F samples (P < 0.001), and yielded lower DFI than the control with F samples (P < 0.05). In FT samples, selection by rheotaxis yielded sperm with higher viability than control, density gradient and swim-up (P < 0.01) while acrosomal integrity and membrane fluidity were maintained. When mouse spermatozoa were selected for ICSI using rheotaxis compared to swim-up, there was an increase in fertilisation (P < 0.01), implantation (P < 0.001) and foetal development rates (P < 0.05). These results suggest that, in the absence of non-destructive DNA testing, the positive rheotaxis can be used to select a population of low DNA fragmentation spermatozoa with high motility, morphology and viability, leading to improved embryo developmental rates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-80
Author(s):  
Jackson Kirkman-Brown ◽  
Sue Pavitt ◽  
Yacoub Khalaf ◽  
Sheena Lewis ◽  
Richard Hooper ◽  
...  

Background Sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has traditionally relied on standardised methods of sperm processing combined with subjective sperm selection (motility/morphology). In 2012, live birth rates (LBRs) stood at ≈24% per cycle started (32% per cycle reaching embryo transfer). Objective(s) The main clinical objective was to determine the benefits of a hyaluronan (HA)-based sperm selection process for physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (PICSI). A parallel, mechanistic objective evaluated sperm chromatin integrity and the potential of PICSI to compensate for poor sperm quality. Design A Phase III, parallel-arm, blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) of efficacy of PICSI versus ICSI alongside mechanistic evaluation. Setting The RCT ran from February 2014 to August 2016, involving NHS (n = 14) and private (n = 2) UK hospital or satellite clinics. Mechanistic work was conducted in three university-based research laboratories and a partnering small–medium enterprise from June 2015 to December 2017. Participants Couples undergoing an ICSI procedure using freshly ejaculated sperm with female partners aged between 18 and 43 years and male partners aged between 18 and 55 years. Intervention Health and Care Professions Council-registered embryologists used the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency-registered (HA-coated) PICSI™ dish (Origio, Måløv, Denmark) to select a single sperm for injection. Control couples received standard care. Main outcome measures Clinical – the primary outcome was full-term live birth (≥ 37 weeks’ gestation). Secondary outcome measures were confirmed clinical pregnancy (CP), miscarriage following confirmation and preterm live birth (< 37 weeks’ gestation). Mechanistic – measurement models were designed for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation, compaction and HA binding [HA binding score (HBS)]. Results A total of 2772 couples were randomised and 2752 couples were included in the primary analysis (PICSI, n = 1371; and ICSI, n = 1381). Clinical – primary outcome: 379 out of 1381 (27.4% PICSI) and 346 out of 1371 (25.2% ICSI) couples who were randomised (up to 24 hours before treatment) into the trial achieved a term live birth ≥ 37 weeks’ gestation [odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.34; p = 0.18]. Subgroup analyses did not reveal differences in treatment effects for HBS, maternal age, previous miscarriage, follicle-stimulating hormone or anti-Müllerian hormone levels and paternal sperm concentrations. Secondary outcomes: CP was achieved for 487 out of 1382 (35.2% PICSI) and 491 out of 1375 (35.7%, ICSI) couples (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.15; p = 0.80). Miscarriage affected 60 out of 1381 (4.3% PICSI) and 96 out of 1371 (7.0% ICSI) of couples (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.84; p = 0.003). Preterm LBRs were 46 out of 1381 (3.3% PICSI) and 45 out of 1371 (3.3% ICSI) (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.55; p = 0.94). Mechanistic: in the subset of samples examined, HBS correlated with sperm motility, concentration, fertilisation rate and DNA fragmentation. Sperm DNA compaction was weakly associated with clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs), but neither HBS nor DNA fragmentation was predictive of any clinical outcome. Limitations Embryologists were not blinded and limited data were available from poorer samples and non-random sample selection in the mechanistic cohort. Prepared rather than raw semen was used for tests of DNA integrity. Conclusions PICSI offered no clear advantage in relation to the primary outcome. PICSI led to a reduced miscarriage risk, but had no effect on CPR or preterm LBR. Future work Re-evaluate PICSI focusing on CP and miscarriage rates and consider aspects of sperm quality that PICSI favours. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99214271. Funding This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. The research is also supported by the NIHR Infrastructure at Leeds and the NIHR Clinical Research Network.


Author(s):  
J. Papin ◽  
G. Stuhtmann ◽  
G. Martinsson ◽  
H. Sieme ◽  
N. Lundeheim ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Sergio Navarro-Serna ◽  
Evelyne París-Oller ◽  
Ondrej Simonik ◽  
Raquel Romar ◽  
Joaquín Gadea

More suitable and efficient methods to protect gametes from external harmful effects during in vitro handling can be achieved by adding preovulatory porcine oviductal fluid (pOF) to in vitro culture media. The objective of this study was to assess the swim-up procedure’s suitability as a sperm selection method using a medium supplemented with 1mg/mL BSA, 1% preovulatory pOF (v/v), 1% v/v pOF plus 1mg/mL BSA, and 5mg/mL BSA. After selection, various sperm parameters were studied, such as sperm recovery rate, sperm morphology, motility (by CASA), vitality, acrosome status and intracellular calcium (by flow cytometry) and ability to penetrate oocytes in vitro. Around 2% of sperm were recovered after swim-up, and the replacement of BSA by pOF showed a beneficial reduction of motility parameters calcium concentration, resulting in an increased penetration rate. The combination of albumin and oviductal fluid in the medium did not improve the sperm parameters results, whereas a high concentration of BSA increased sperm morphological abnormalities, motility, and acrosome damage, with a reduction of calcium concentration and penetration rate. In conclusion, the replacement of albumin by preovulatory oviductal fluid in the swim-up sperm preparation method modifies boar sperm parameters and improves the in vitro penetration of oocytes.


1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAHMOUD ◽  
GORDTS ◽  
VEREECKEN ◽  
SERNEELS ◽  
CAMPO ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erica T. Y. Leung ◽  
Cheuk-Lun Lee ◽  
Xinyi Tian ◽  
Kevin K. W. Lam ◽  
Raymond H. W. Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K C Mantravadi ◽  
D R Gedela

Abstract Study question In Individuals with raised Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (SDF), will sperm selection by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) or surgical retrieval of testicular sperms (TESA) optimize the reproductive outcomes? Summary answer Couples with failed implantation raised SDF, TESA /MACS offer similar results. This RCT doesn’t prove superiority or added benefit with any of the above interventions. What is known already It is evident that raised SDF negatively affects the reproductive outcomes. Management for raised SDF to optimize reproductive outcomes is still elusive. Study design, size, duration This was a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with prior approval from institutional Ethical Committee and trial registration. Couples undergoing stimulation with raised SDF were randomized to MACS (n = 75) and TESA (n = 75) for sperm selection between April2019 & February2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Couples with history of one failed IVF had SDF testing and SDF&gt;30% were recruited. SDF test done with SCSA method and randomized using software. ICSI was the method of insemination. Extended embryo culture till blastocyst was done and freeze all policy was opted. Two Blastocysts that showed 100% survival were transferred in a Frozen Embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Embryonic and Reproductive outcomes were compared between both groups. Live birth and Miscarriage were the primary outcomes. Main results and the role of chance Reproductive Outcomes of MACS Vs TESA were: Average Blastocyst conversion - 32% Vs 39% (RR 1.22, CI1.00 to 1.50) Implantation rate (IR) - 50% Vs 35% (RR - 0.71, CI 0.51 to 0.98) Miscarriage rate (MR) - 5.3% Vs 11% (RR1.6333, CI 0.5227 to 5.1039) Multiple Pregnancy rate (MPR) - 8% Vs 4% Live birth Rate (LBR) per Intention to treat (ITT) - 41.3% Vs 44% (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.26) LBR per ET cycle - 63% Vs 56% (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.94) Our preliminary results suggest that despite greater availability of blastocysts for transfer in the TESA group, no difference in ART outcomes was observed between the groups. Though the IR was statistically low with TESA, our primary outcomes LBR and MR were comparable. TESA or MACS seem to offer similar outcomes. Considering the invasiveness with TESA, MACS can be offered for better sperm selection for couples with raised sperm DFI & failed implantation. Limitations, reasons for caution Small sample size. TESA is a surgical intervention Wider implications of the findings Optimal intervention for management of SDF still needs further research. Trial registration number CTRI/2019/07/020140


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document