Efficiency of additional organic inputs for carbon sequestration in agricultural soils modulated by the priming effect and physical accessibility

Geoderma ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 406 ◽  
pp. 115498
Author(s):  
Guocheng Wang ◽  
Mingming Wang ◽  
Xiaowei Guo ◽  
Yongqiang Yu ◽  
Pengfei Han ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-316
Author(s):  
Laure Bamière ◽  
Pierre‐Alain Jayet ◽  
Salomé Kahindo ◽  
Elsa Martin

2021 ◽  
pp. 108-126
Author(s):  
Merve Demir ◽  
Iain Green ◽  
Tilak Ginige

Carbon is crucial for life and exists in various reservoirs, such as plant tissues, soil organic matter, geology, and atmosphere. There is a direct relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere and rising temperatures. CO2 is removed from the atmosphere and stored in ecosystems. Carbon sequestration (CS) – the process of capturing and storing atmospheric CO2 – and expanding C storage of soils are appealing climate change (CC) responses. Agricultural soils are one of the largest C reservoirs and have potential for extended CS. Thus, protecting this ecosystem service (ES) we obtain from soils is crucial for addressing CC. Soil protection legislation should incorporate the significance of CS. The key issues in the sphere of natural resources can only be addressed by utilizing natural sciences in legal arguments. Accordingly, this study begins with highlighting the importance of soils for CS from a natural science perspective. This study analyses soil protection laws in the UK by scrutinizing whether they eliminate pressures on agricultural soils in a way that protect CS. The findings of this study suggest that soil protection laws do not offer a satisfactory protection for CS. We conclude by discussing alternative approaches for protecting CS in an effective manner and reverse the current trends in ES protection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Piccolo ◽  
Riccardo Spaccini ◽  
Vincenza Cozzolino ◽  
Assunta Nuzzo ◽  
Marios Drosos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Dold ◽  
Herbst Michael ◽  
Weihermüller Lutz ◽  
Vereecken Harry

<p>The limitation of global warming to +1.5°C compared to preindustrial levels requires net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions globally by mid-century and substantial removal of CO<sub>2</sub> thereafter. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils has been proposed as a potential mitigation strategy. Aim of this study is to quantify current carbon storage and emission reduction potential in agricultural soils, and assess the impact of mitigation measures in a prognostic modeling approach. The land surface model Community Land Model 5.0 (CLM) is used to assess soil carbon changes in agricultural soils in Germany. The simulation domain was set up with an 8 x 8 km grid across Germany using recent land use and soil texture maps, and parameters for major field crops. The model was spun up for ~1500 years with a 30-year climate dataset. Preliminary results show that spinup-derived organic carbon density (OCD, 0-188 cm) was significantly related to Soil Grid v2 OCD (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82), but only weakly related to field-measured OCD (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21). The simulated OCD values in the upper 32 cm soil layer were lower in Northwestern Germany compared to Soil Grids. This is probably due to the intensive use of organic amendment application in the region, and CLM5 lacks a subroutine for simulating organic carbon application. In a next step, carbon storage for different climate projections (regional EUR11 RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios) and management systems from 2020 - 2100 will be investigated. We will present preliminary results and discuss improvements of CLM5 to better represent agricultural soils.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 665 ◽  
pp. 890-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Nayak ◽  
Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman ◽  
Ravi Naidu ◽  
B. Dhal ◽  
C.K. Swain ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L.N. Carvalho ◽  
C.E.P. Cerri ◽  
B.J. Feigl ◽  
M.C. Píccolo ◽  
V.P. Godinho ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjuan Sun ◽  
Yao Huang ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Yongqiang Yu

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kätterer ◽  
M. A. Bolinder ◽  
K. Berglund ◽  
H. Kirchmann

2016 ◽  
Vol 566-567 ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immo Kämpf ◽  
Norbert Hölzel ◽  
Maria Störrle ◽  
Gabriele Broll ◽  
Kathrin Kiehl

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document