The downside of prominence in a network of marketing alliances

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jameson K.M. Watts ◽  
Kenneth W. Koput
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
pp. 453-463
Author(s):  
Alexander Agenosov ◽  
Natalya Khmelkova

The paper provides a methodological explanation of the essence of shifting from the native advertising format (advertisement integration) to co-branding (brand alliance) involving companies and influencers (opinion leaders) that interact in the digital environment. Such a shift is interpreted by the authors as a process of strategic development of marketing cooperation in the digital environment, since co-branding involves launching new products to the market and is accompanied by creating new markets and needs. The authors propose their own approach to the issue in hand from the perspective of marketing alliance typology based on the marketing complex model. Differences between advertisement integrations and co-branding are conceptualized following this model. The need to consider influencers’ role in forging brand alliances is explained from the branding theory perspective. Differences between celebrity endorsements marketing and influencer marketing are identified. The proposed methodology is applied to study actual cases of co-branding in the digital environment involving Russian and foreign companies that are associated with shaping a new market of gender-neutral cosmetics. Eventually, a conclusion is made on the need for further study of marketing alliances in the digital space to establish a comprehensive theoretical and methodology foundation and accumulate empirical material on the issue in hand.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 971-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Grieco ◽  
Gennaro Iasevoli

Purpose Co-marketing strategies play an important role in enabling firms to improve their competitive position. However, despite its increasing implementation, it remains a topic that is largely not researched. The purpose of this paper is to analyze existing contributions to the field of co-marketing research and the different perspectives scholars have adopted in analyzing the topic. Design/methodology/approach A literature review has been developed, as its lack seems to be a major hindrance to the development of related studies. A specific focus has been made on the adopted approaches. Five approaches have been identified, and multidimensional scaling (MDS) has been used to analyze the differences among them. Findings First, the analysis of the typologies of studies on co-marketing alliances is made. Also, the identified approaches are strategic-based, consumer-based, relational-based, specificity-based and evaluation-based. What emerges from the MDS is that there are two perspectives of analysis of the alliance that characterize them: the inside–outside and the wide–narrow points of view. Research limitations/implications Limitations are mostly referred to the methodologies and the level of subjectivity they imply. For example, they are not only the choices made concerning keywords to be used and, consequently, the articles included in the analysis, but also the MDS that offers broad autonomy to the researchers in interpreting the data. Originality/value The originality of this research is that it fills an emerged gap concerning a literature review on co-marketing alliances, supporting future research in this field of study. The identification of the approaches underlines what may be lacking, providing interesting insights on possible avenues for future research.


2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 52-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanitha Swaminathan ◽  
Christine Moorman

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky J. Starnes ◽  
Donald R. Self

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
Alan R. Andreasen

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald R. Self ◽  
Becky J. Starnes

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Palmer ◽  
David Bejou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document