Incentivizing Prescription Drug Switching to Reduce Patient and Health Plan Spending: A Microsimulation Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Yeung ◽  
Ernesto Ulloa
2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 680-692
Author(s):  
Norman V. Carroll ◽  
Matthew P. Mitchell ◽  
H. Eric Cannon ◽  
Bryan W. York ◽  
Robert S. Oscar

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. W408-W419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Parks Thomas ◽  
Stanley S. Wallack ◽  
Sue Lee ◽  
Grant A. Ritter

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 433-438
Author(s):  
Tiffany Del Rosario ◽  
Molly Colombo ◽  
Marisa Brailsford ◽  
Sharon Jhawar ◽  
Romilla Batra

Objective To evaluate the impact of opioid safety edits on opioid utilization. Design Retrospective review. Setting Senior Care Action Network (SCAN) Health Plan, a Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan. Patients, Participants The opioid safety edits reviewed included edits for the following: initial opioid fill more than 7 days’ supply (DS), cumulative opioid doses 90 or greater and 240 or greater morphine milligram equivalent (MME), concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine (COB) use. Members with prescription drug claims meeting these criteria pre- and postedit implementation and those with prescription drug claim rejections resulting from the edits were included in the review. Results 15,232 members experienced claim rejections resulting from the edits. Comparison of utilization pre and postedit implementation revealed the following results (P < 0.001): 41% decrease in the proportion of members with an initial opioid fill for more than 7 DS; 18% decrease in the proportion of members on opioid doses 90 MME or more; 26% decrease in the proportion of members on opioid doses 240 MME or more; 18% decrease in the proportion of members with COB. Conclusion Opioid safety edits are an effective way to combat overuse and misuse. They serve as a means for increasing collaboration between plans, prescribers, pharmacists, and members which improves care coordination, reduces adverse risks, and helps keep members safe.


2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Nicholas ◽  
Holly Divine ◽  
Margaret Nowak-Rapp ◽  
Kenneth B. Roberts

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Sandra Schwartz ◽  
Janet McCarty

Abstract Challenging health plan denials for voice treatment through appeals or advocacy efforts can pay off. This article describes the process of obtaining authorization for voice therapy, filing claims, establishing goals, preparing needed documentation, appealing claims through various levels including independent review, and developing an advocacy campaign if coverage is not offered or is very limited.


Ob Gyn News ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (15) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document