The explanatory limits of cognitive archaeology
I make two claims about cognitive archaeology. I question its role, seeing psychology as yet another contributor to the archaeological tool-kit rather than as something unique. I then suggest that cognitive archaeology is not in a position to provide evolutionary contexts without other disciplines. As a consequence it cannot deliver on the provision of evolutionary contexts for cognitive evolution.
2012 ◽
Vol 367
(1599)
◽
pp. 2108-2118
◽
Keyword(s):
2010 ◽
Vol 32
(7)
◽
pp. 579-582
◽
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):