The explanatory limits of cognitive archaeology

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-412
Author(s):  
Ben Jeffares

I make two claims about cognitive archaeology. I question its role, seeing psychology as yet another contributor to the archaeological tool-kit rather than as something unique. I then suggest that cognitive archaeology is not in a position to provide evolutionary contexts without other disciplines. As a consequence it cannot deliver on the provision of evolutionary contexts for cognitive evolution.

2002 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietrich Stout

Wynn shows that intentionally standardized artifacts (handaxes) provide evidence of the ability to conceptualize form (symmetry). However, such conceptual ability is not sufficient for the actual production of these forms. Stone knapping is a concrete skill that is acquired in the real world. Appreciation of its perceptual-motor foundations and the broader issues surrounding skill acquisition may lead to further important insights into human cognitive evolution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 386-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick L. Coolidge ◽  
Thomas Wynn

Cognitive archaeology studies human cognitive evolution by applying cognitive-science theories and concepts to archaeological remains of the prehistoric past. After reviewing the basic epistemological stance of cognitive archaeology, this article illustrates this interdisciplinary endeavor through an examination of two of the most important transitions in hominin cognitive evolution—the appearance of Homo erectus about 2 million years ago, and the recent enhancement of working-memory capacity within the past 200,000 years. Although intentionally created stone tools date to about 3.3 million years ago, Homo erectus produced a bifacial, symmetrical handaxe whose design then persisted for nearly the next 2 million years. An enhancement in working-memory capacity may have been responsible for the relative explosion of culture within the past 50,000 years, which included personal ornamentation, highly ritualized burials, bow-and-arrow technology, depictive cave art, and artistic figurines.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karenleigh A. Overmann ◽  
Frederick L. Coolidge

We look back at the field of cognitive archaeology by discussing the moment of insight that inspired one of its pioneers, Thomas Wynn, to apply Piagetian developmental theory to the question of human cognitive evolution as understood through geometric relations in stone tools. We also review the work of other pioneers in the field, including Colin Renfrew and John Gowlett. We briefly describe the articles contained in the volume. Lastly, we look forward at where the field of cognitive archaeology may be headed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Hare ◽  
Irene Plyusnina ◽  
Natalie Ignacio ◽  
Olesya Schepina ◽  
Anna Stepika ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1599) ◽  
pp. 2108-2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Barrett ◽  
S. Peter Henzi ◽  
David Lusseau

Understanding human cognitive evolution, and that of the other primates, means taking sociality very seriously. For humans, this requires the recognition of the sociocultural and historical means by which human minds and selves are constructed, and how this gives rise to the reflexivity and ability to respond to novelty that characterize our species. For other, non-linguistic, primates we can answer some interesting questions by viewing social life as a feedback process, drawing on cybernetics and systems approaches and using social network neo-theory to test these ideas. Specifically, we show how social networks can be formalized as multi-dimensional objects, and use entropy measures to assess how networks respond to perturbation. We use simulations and natural ‘knock-outs’ in a free-ranging baboon troop to demonstrate that changes in interactions after social perturbations lead to a more certain social network, in which the outcomes of interactions are easier for members to predict. This new formalization of social networks provides a framework within which to predict network dynamics and evolution, helps us highlight how human and non-human social networks differ and has implications for theories of cognitive evolution.


Reports ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Quintana ◽  
Carlos Agra ◽  
Lucía Outeiral ◽  
Ana Devesa ◽  
David Llorente ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piernanda Vigliano ◽  
Giorgia Margary ◽  
Irene Bagnasco ◽  
Laura Jarre
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document