Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: Multination findings from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA).

2012 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1054-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Martin ◽  
Gregory A. D. Liem ◽  
Magdalena M. C. Mok ◽  
Jacob Xu
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-167
Author(s):  
Andrés Strello ◽  
Rolf Strietholt ◽  
Isa Steinmann ◽  
Charlotte Siepmann

AbstractResearch to date on the effects of between-school tracking on inequalities in achievement and on performance has been inconclusive. A possible explanation is that different studies used different data, focused on different domains, and employed different measures of inequality. To address this issue, we used all accumulated data collected in the three largest international assessments—PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment), PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study), and TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study)—in the past 20 years in 75 countries and regions. Following the seminal paper by Hanushek and Wößmann (2006), we combined data from a total of 21 cycles of primary and secondary school assessments to estimate difference-in-differences models for different outcome measures. We synthesized the effects using a meta-analytical approach and found strong evidence that tracking increased social achievement gaps, that it had smaller but still significant effects on dispersion inequalities, and that it had rather weak effects on educational inadequacies. In contrast, we did not find evidence that tracking increased performance levels. Besides these substantive findings, our study illustrated that the effect estimates varied considerably across the datasets used because the low number of countries as the units of analysis was a natural limitation. This finding casts doubt on the reproducibility of findings based on single international datasets and suggests that researchers should use different data sources to replicate analyses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 776-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anqing Zheng ◽  
Elliot M. Tucker-Drob ◽  
Daniel A. Briley

We replicated the study by Tucker-Drob, Cheung, and Briley (2014), who found that the association between science interest and science knowledge depended on economic resources at the family, school, and national levels, using data from the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). In more economically prosperous families, schools, and nations, student interest was more strongly correlated with actual knowledge. Here, we investigated whether these results still held despite substantial changes to educational and economic systems over roughly a decade. Using similar data from PISA 2015 ( N = 537,170), we found largely consistent results. Students from more economically advantaged homes, schools, and nations exhibited a stronger link between interests and knowledge. However, these moderation effects were substantially reduced, and the main effect of science interest increased by nearly 25%, driven almost entirely by families of low socioeconomic status and nations with low gross domestic product. The interdependence of interests and resources is robust but perhaps weakening with educational progress.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-157
Author(s):  
Gabriella Kovács ◽  
Katalin Harangus

AbstractLinguistic and cultural mediators, such as translators, interpreters, and language teachers, need complex and well-developed language skills in all the languages they work with. In this study, we examine the connections and correlations among the following skills: reading literacy in native language, reading literacy in foreign language, problem solving and translation. Three of these skills (reading in native and foreign language and problem solving) are evaluated on a three-level scale based on the three cognitive processes used in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessments (location of information, understanding, evaluation and reflection) (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development – OECD 2018). The methodology of measuring reading comprehension in native language and problem-solving skills has already been developed and applied by our research group (Pletl 2019, Harangus 2018); therefore, after assessing the foreign language reading literacy and translation skills, we will be able to analyse the translator trainees’ results based on the aforementioned three-level scale and examine possible connections and correlations between the different but interrelated skills. With an interdisciplinary approach, this study concentrates on revealing the overlaps and meeting points, the spaces in between the use of these skills.


Author(s):  
Rafael Cabezuelo Vivo ◽  
Víctor Pavón

The purpose of this study is to investigate to what extent the use of L2 in math tests influences bilingual education learners’ process of word problem solving in a mandatory secondary education school with Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). The reading comprehension level of the students was analysed using a standards-based assessment and the questions used in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests. The word problems were selected according to the students’ level of reading-comprehension and mathematical competence. Leaners also had to answer a questionnaire, which was used to analyse if contextual factors were affecting mathematical performance in L2. To this end, the questionnaire included some questions related to the bilingual history of the students and their perception about solving word problems in English. Data were analysed through one-way or two-way ANOVA tests to find out which factors were relevant. Results show that solving word problems is not only affected by the use of L2, but that it also depends on the mathematical difficulty, irrespective of the students’ level of language proficiency. The findings, hence, imply that interaction between linguistic difficulty and mathematical complexity is at the centre of the issues affecting word problem solving.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 80-90
Author(s):  
Chandra Mani Paudel ◽  
Ram Chandra Panday

This paper tries to present results from a systematic review of literature that reviewed the large-scale assessments finding in the South Asian context especially focusing Nepal. The main objective of the LEAP programme is to reform the quality of learning in the Asia-Pacific region by developing capacity of the Member States to collect, analyze and utilize international and national assessment data identifying learning enablers. The review has identified the high order skills overshadowed by rote learning. It has also employed Item Response Theory (IRT) making assessments comparable and connected with the previous levels. International Assessments such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) collected vast amounts of data on schools, students and households. The use of education-related “big data” for evidence-based policy making is limited, partly due to insufficient institutional capacity of countries to analyze such data and link results with policies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 98-113
Author(s):  
Rayner Bin Tangkui ◽  
Tan Choon Keong

Keupayaan untuk memahami dan menguasai konsep pecahan akan menyediakan asas yang kukuh untuk memahami konsep matematik yang lebih kompleks serta membantu dalam melakukan penyelesaian masalah yang melibatkan pecahan dalam kehidupan seharian. Namun demikian, dapatan pentaksiran antarabangsa Trends in Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMSS) dan Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) menunjukkan bahawa pencapaian pecahan di kalangan murid di Malaysia adalah di tahap kurang memuaskan iaitu berada di bawah skor purata antarabangsa. Dengan mengambil kira perkembangan inovasi dan kecanggihan permainan digital masa kini, tujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kesan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan digital menggunakan Minecraft terhadap peningkatan pencapaian murid dalam pecahan. Kuasi-eksperimen dengan reka bentuk ujian pra dan ujian pasca kumpulan rawatan dan kumpulan kawalan yang melibatkan 65 orang murid tahun lima dalam dua buah kelas sedia ada telah dijalankan. Melalui pensampelan kluster, sebuah kelas terpilih sebagai kumpulan rawatan manakala kelas yang satu lagi terpilih sebagai kumpulan kawalan. Kumpulan rawatan terdiri daripada 31orang murid yang didedahkan dengan kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan permainan digital menggunakan Minecraft manakala kumpulan kawalan terdiri daripada 34 orang murid yang didedahkan dengan kaedah konvensional. Data dianalisis menggunakan ujian-t dua kumpulan sampel tak bersandar bagi membandingkan min skor pencapaian ujian pasca bagi pecahan antara kumpulan rawatan dengan kumpulan kawalan. Terdapat perbezaan signifikan dalam min skor pencapaian antara kumpulan rawatan (m = 51.096, sp = 17.242) dengan kumpulan kawalan (m = 35.235, sp = 18.171). Hasil kajian ini akan lebih menggalakkan pelaksanaan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan digital menggunakan Minecraft dalam pengajaran matematik bagi meningkatkan pencapaian murid dalam pecahan.


Author(s):  
Yogi Anggraena

The Trending topic in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) have become a new standard for mathematics learning. One of the objectives of the study from TIMSS and PISA is to know the students' abilities in reasoning, identifying, and understanding, and using the basic mathematics needed in daily life. Or in other words, students must have mathematical literacy. The concept of mathematical literacy is intended the ability of individuals to formulate, use, and interpret mathematics in various contexts. This includes mathematical reasoning and using mathematical concepts, procedures, facts, and equipment to describe, explain, and predict phenomena or events (OECD, 2013). Indonesia has participated in TIMSS and PISA studies several times, from the TIMSS and PISA study results, it shows that students have not been able to develop optimally about their thinking abilities in mathematics schools and are still low in ability (1) to understand complex information, (2) theory , analysis and problem solving, (3) using tools, procedures and problem solving and (4) conducting investigations. In 2014, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) stated that learning mathematics today is still too formal, lacks connection with the meaning, understanding, and application of mathematical concepts, and fails to give sufficient attention to the ability of reasoning and solving problem. These results indicate that there needs to be a change in curriculum orientation, which is not to burden students with content but prioritize the aspects of essential abilities needed by all citizens to participate in developing their country in the 21st century. Therefore it is necessary to develop a mathematics curriculum that enhances students' abilities in reasoning and problem solving in order to improve the quality of mathematics for students knowledge and skill in this global era.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document