The Role of Positive Affect in Facilitating Decision Making and Judgment

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Isen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Positive Affect

Positive Affect and Career Decision‐Making: The Moderating Role of Interpersonal Spin

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62
Author(s):  
In‐Jo Park ◽  
Shenyang Hai ◽  
Jos Akkermans ◽  
Marijke Verbruggen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Career Decision ◽  
Career Decision Making ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals Happiness and Time Preference: The Effect of Positive Affect in a Random-Assignment Experiment

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
pp. 3109-3129 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Ifcher ◽  
Homa Zarghamee
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Time Preference ◽  
Random Assignment ◽  
Economic Decision ◽  
Economic Decision Making ◽  
Future Utility ◽  
Neutral Affect

We conduct a random-assignment experiment to investigate whether positive affect impacts time preference, where time preference denotes a preference for present over future utility. Our result indicates that, compared to neutral affect, mild positive affect significantly reduces time preference over money. This result is robust to various specification checks, and alternative interpretations of the result are considered. Our result has implications for the effect of happiness on time preference and the role of emotions in economic decision making, in general. Finally, we reconfirm the ubiquity of time preference and start to explore its determinants. (DJEL D12, D83, I31)

The Role of Positive Affect on Thinking and Decision-Making

2014 ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Tedlie Moskowitz ◽  
Margaret S. Clark ◽  
Anthony D. Ong ◽  
June Gruber
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Positive Affect

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

Social and Temporal Comparisons as Moderators of Psychological Resources Associations With Wellbeing

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasida Ben-Zur
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Positive Affect ◽  
Subjective Wellbeing ◽  
Social Comparisons ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
Psychological Resources ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Age Range ◽  
General Wellbeing

Abstract. The current study investigated the associations of psychological resources, social comparisons, and temporal comparisons with general wellbeing. The sample included 142 community participants (47.9% men; age range 23–83 years), who compared themselves with others, and with their younger selves, on eight dimensions (e.g., physical health, resilience). They also completed questionnaires assessing psychological resources of mastery and self-esteem, and three components of subjective wellbeing: life satisfaction and negative and positive affect. The main results showed that high levels of psychological resources contributed to wellbeing, with self-enhancing social and temporal comparisons moderating the effects of resources on certain wellbeing components. Specifically, under low levels of mastery or self-esteem self-enhancing social or temporal comparisons were related to either higher life satisfaction or positive affect. The results highlight the role of resources and comparisons in promoting people’s wellbeing, and suggest that self-enhancing comparisons function as cognitive coping mechanisms when psychological resources are low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document