Supplemental Material for A Replication and Extension of the Interpersonal Process Model of Demand/Withdraw Behavior: Incorporating Subjective Emotional Experience

Author(s):  
Karena Leo ◽  
Alexander O. Crenshaw ◽  
Jasara N. Hogan ◽  
Stacia V. Bourne ◽  
Katherine J. W. Baucom ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Baucom ◽  
Janna A. Dickenson ◽  
David C. Atkins ◽  
Donald H. Baucom ◽  
Melanie S. Fischer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elana Graber ◽  
Jean-Philippe Laurenceau ◽  
Amber Belcher

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Ackerman ◽  
Conrad A. Corretti

Problems with intimacy constitute an important area of interpersonal dysfunction in those with personality pathology. Drawing on the interpersonal process model of intimacy, the present research used a longitudinal dyadic design of same–sex roommate pairs (n = 103) to address how certain pathological personality traits (i.e. Negative Affect, Detachment, and Antagonism) relate to the development of disclosure, perceived responsiveness, and closeness. We expected that participants’ pathological traits would be linked to both their own and their roommate's intimacy development, and that the mechanisms underlying these links would include the endorsement of interpersonal values and/or the dispositional expression of interpersonal behaviour in the roommate relationship. Our findings demonstrate that interpersonal motives and/or behaviours primarily help to explain how individuals with higher levels of Detachment manifest difficulty with intimacy. Implications of our findings for research on personality pathology, normative traits, and intimacy are discussed. Copyright © 2015 European Association of Personality Psychology


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Nicole Shelton ◽  
Thomas E. Trail ◽  
Tessa V. West ◽  
Hilary B. Bergsieker

2021 ◽  
pp. 014616722199334
Author(s):  
Tatum A. Jolink ◽  
Yen-Ping Chang ◽  
Sara B. Algoe

Affectionate touch is an important behavior in close relationships throughout the lifespan. Research has investigated the relational and individual psychological and physical benefits of affectionate touch, but the situational factors that give rise to it have been overlooked. Theorizing from the interpersonal process model of intimacy, the current studies tested whether perceived partner responsiveness forecasts affectionate touch in romantic couples. Following a preliminary integrative data analysis ( N = 842), three prospective studies use ecologically valid behavioral (Studies 1 and 2) and daily (Studies 2 and 3) data, showing a positive association between perceived partner responsiveness and affectionate touch. Furthermore, in Study 3, we tested a theoretical extension of the interpersonal process of intimacy, finding that affectionate touch forecasts the partner’s perception of the touch-giver’s responsiveness the next day. Findings suggest affectionate touch may be an untested mechanism at the heart of the interpersonal process of intimacy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie A. Kay

According to the focal article by Britt, Shen, Sinclair, Grossman, and Klieger (2016), it seems conclusive that all definitions of resilience involve an experience of significant adversity, regardless of whether it is examined as a trait or an outcome. This experience of adversity is inherently emotional. When considering the ability or outcome of “bouncing back” from a stressful or chronic event, one must recognize the emotional experience and consider how individuals may cope with their emotions. This said, there is a clear connection between resilience and emotion regulation. The focal article presents a descriptive model of resilience for employees, which includes mention of energy and affect as individual resources but does not acknowledge the connection between resilience and emotion regulation. In this commentary I argue that these two research areas are related but largely neglected in the current literature. I will discuss the (a) process model of emotion regulation, (b) points of connection with resilience, and (c) empirical research suggesting the importance of positive emotion.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maëlan Q. Menétrey ◽  
Gelareh Mohammadi ◽  
Joana Leitão ◽  
Patrik Vuilleumier

ABSTRACTEmotions are rich and complex experiences involving various behavioral and physiological responses. While many empirical studies have focused on discrete and dimensional representations of emotions, these representations do not fully reconcile with recent neuroscience studies that increasingly suggest a multi-process mechanism underlying emotional experience. Moreover, the latter view accords with psychological theories that consider emotions as multicomponent phenomena, such as appraisal theories. Although there is no complete consensus on the specific components of emotions and fundamental principles defining their organization, the Component Process Model (CPM) is well established framework describing an emotion as a dynamic process with five major highly interrelated components: cognitive appraisal, expression, motivation, physiology and feeling. Yet, few studies have systematically investigated a range of discrete emotions through this full multi-componential view. In the present study, we therefore elicited various emotions during movie watching and measured their manifestation across these components. Our primary goal was to investigate the relationship between physiological measures and the theoretically defined components of emotions. In addition, we also investigated whether discrete emotions could be predicted from information provided by the multicomponent response patterns, as well as the specific contributions of each component in such predictions. Results suggest that physiological features are interrelated to all other components of emotion, but the least significant predictors for emotion classification. Overall, emotion prediction was significantly higher when classifiers were trained with all five components. The findings therefore support a description of emotion as a dynamic multicomponent process, in which the emergence of a conscious feeling state requires the integration of all the components.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document