Stability of the Early Components of the Averaged Electroencephalic Response

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice I. Mendel ◽  
Robert Goldstein

The early components of the averaged electroencephalic response (AER) were examined at three-hour intervals in eight normal hearing adults over a single, sleepless 24-hour span. During each of the eight sessions, three series of clicks at 50 dB SL were presented to the right ear of the subject as he sat reading. 1024 clicks at the rate of 9.6/sec were used in obtaining each averaged response. Electroencephalic activity was recorded from an electrode on the vertex referred to the left earlobe. The response pattern was very stable, characterized by a polyphasic configuration with mean peak latencies of (P o ) 13.3 msec, (N a ) 22.0 msec, (P a ) 32.3 msec, and (N b ) 45.1 msec. An earlier negative peak (N o ) with a mean peak latency of 8.3 msec occurred in many of the responses. At the conclusion of the 24-hour span, three of the subjects were tested with the same stimuli during various stages of sleep. The early components of the AER remained consistent even during sleep. Threshold searches were successfully carried out on two of the sleeping subjects. The long-term stability of the early components of the AER in the awake and sleep states makes them practical as a response index for electroencephalic audiometry. Their characteristics are more compatible with a neurogenic than with a myogenic theory of their origin.

1967 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 697-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Goldstein ◽  
Leslie B. Rodman

Averaged evoked responses to clicks were elicited from 20 normal-hearing subjects between the ages of 16 and 41. Two thousand clicks were presented to the right ear at the rate of 10 per sec at 60, 30, 10, 5, 0, −5, and −10 dB SL. Sensation levels were varied randomly. In each series two control conditions without stimulation were randomly interspersed. Electroencephalic potentials were recorded from an electrode on the vertex of the skull referred to the left earlobe. The response pattern was relatively consistent with a vertex-negative peak (N a ) at about 20–24 msec, and a vertex-positive peak (P a ) at about 31–35 msec. Another vertex-negative peak (N b ) at about 46–50 msec was seen less frequently. Criteria for response were established on the basis of the occurrence of N a and P a within prescribed latencies as well as the interval between the two peaks of about 12–13 msec. The number of identifiable responses diminished with diminishing sensation levels but responses were observed in about one-half of the subjects as low as −5 dB SL.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srikanta K. Mishra ◽  
Carolina Abdala

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability of a fine-resolution, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE)–based assay of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex in normal-hearing adults.MethodData were collected during 36 test sessions from 4 normal-hearing adults to assess short-term stability and 5 normal-hearing adults to assess long-term stability. DPOAE level and phase measurements were recorded with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation. MOC reflex indices were computed by (a) noting contralateral acoustic stimulation-induced changes in DPOAE level (both absolute and normalized) at fine-structure peaks, (b) recording the effect as a vector difference, and (c) separating DPOAE components and considering a component-specific metric.ResultsAnalyses indicated good repeatability of all indices of the MOC reflex in most frequency ranges. Short- and long-term repeatability were generally comparable. Indices normalized to a subject's own baseline fared best, showing strong short- and long-term stability across all frequency intervals.ConclusionsThese results suggest that fine-resolution DPOAE-based measures of the MOC reflex measured at strategic frequencies are stable, and natural variance from day-to-day or week-to-week durations is small enough to detect between-group differences and possibly to monitor intervention-related success. However, this is an empirical question that must be directly tested to confirm its utility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document