Best linear unbiased and invariant estimation in location-scale families based on double-ranked set sampling

Wollack et al. (2015) suggested the erasure detection index (EDI) for detecting fraudulent erasures for individual examinees. Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) extended the index of Wollack et al. (2015) to suggest three EDIs for detecting fraudulent erasures at the aggregate or group level. This article follows up on the research of Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018) and suggests a new aggregate-level EDI by incorporating the empirical best linear unbiased predictor from the literature of linear mixed-effects models (e.g., McCulloch et al., 2008). A simulation study shows that the new EDI has larger power than the indices of Wollack and Eckerly (2017) and Sinharay (2018). In addition, the new index has satisfactory Type I error rates. A real data example is also included.

Download Full-text

New estimator for the variances of strata in ranked set sampling

Soft Computing ◽

10.1007/s00500-021-05787-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

M. Mahdizadeh ◽

Ehsan Zamanzade

Keyword(s):

Ranked Set Sampling

Download Full-text

GWAS findings improved genomic prediction accuracy of lipid profile traits: Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-85203-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mahdi Akbarzadeh ◽

Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi ◽

Mahmoud Amiri Roudbar ◽

Mehdi Sargolzaei ◽

Kamran Guity ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lipid Profile ◽

Genetic Study ◽

Prediction Accuracy ◽

Significant Snps ◽

Snp Markers ◽

Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽

Genetic Prediction ◽

Heritability Estimation ◽

Precise Prediction ◽

Best Linear Unbiased

AbstractIn recent decades, ongoing GWAS findings discovered novel therapeutic modifications such as whole-genome risk prediction in particular. Here, we proposed a method based on integrating the traditional genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) approach with GWAS information to boost genetic prediction accuracy and gene-based heritability estimation. This study was conducted in the framework of the Tehran Cardio-metabolic Genetic study (TCGS) containing 14,827 individuals and 649,932 SNP markers. Five SNP subsets were selected based on GWAS results: top 1%, 5%, 10%, 50% significant SNPs, and reported associated SNPs in previous studies. Furthermore, we randomly selected subsets as large as every five subsets. Prediction accuracy has been investigated on lipid profile traits with a tenfold and 10-repeat cross-validation algorithm by the gBLUP method. Our results revealed that genetic prediction based on selected subsets of SNPs obtained from the dataset outperformed the subsets from previously reported SNPs. Selected SNPs’ subsets acquired a more precise prediction than whole SNPs and much higher than randomly selected SNPs. Also, common SNPs with the most captured prediction accuracy in the selected sets caught the highest gene-based heritability. However, it is better to be mindful of the fact that a small number of SNPs obtained from GWAS results could capture a highly notable proportion of variance and prediction accuracy.

Download Full-text

Fisher Information in Moving Extreme Ranked Set Sampling with Application to Parameter Estimation

Journal of Systems Science and Complexity ◽

10.1007/s11424-021-0177-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Dongsen Yao ◽

Wangxue Chen ◽

Rui Yang ◽

Chunxian Long

Keyword(s):

Parameter Estimation ◽

Fisher Information ◽

Ranked Set Sampling ◽

Extreme Ranked Set Sampling

Download Full-text

Genomic Prediction Using Alternative Strategies of Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP for Yearling Weight and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle

Genes ◽

10.3390/genes12020266 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 266

Author(s):

Hossein Mehrban ◽

Masoumeh Naserkheil ◽

Deuk Hwan Lee ◽

Chungil Cho ◽

Taejeong Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quantitative Trait Loci ◽

Beef Cattle ◽

Genomic Prediction ◽

Quantitative Trait ◽

Carcass Traits ◽

Best Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽

Single Step ◽

Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽

Single Nucleotide ◽

Best Linear Unbiased

The weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method has been proposed to exploit information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives, allowing the use of weights for single-nucleotide polymorphism in the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genetic prediction using the following single-trait best linear unbiased prediction methods in Hanwoo beef cattle: pedigree-based (PBLUP), un-weighted (ssGBLUP), and weighted (WssGBLUP) single-step genomic methods. We also assessed the impact of alternative single and window weighting methods according to their effects on the traits of interest. The data was comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight (YW) and 5622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness: BFT, carcass weight: CW, eye muscle area: EMA, and marbling score: MS). Also, the genotypic data included 6616 animals for YW and 5134 for carcass traits on the 43,950 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The ssGBLUP showed significant improvement in genomic prediction accuracy for carcass traits (71%) and yearling weight (99%) compared to the pedigree-based method. The window weighting procedures performed better than single SNP weighting for CW (11%), EMA (11%), MS (3%), and YW (6%), whereas no gain in accuracy was observed for BFT. Besides, the improvement in accuracy between window WssGBLUP and the un-weighted method was low for BFT and MS, while for CW, EMA, and YW resulted in a gain of 22%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, which indicates the presence of relevant quantitative trait loci for these traits. These findings indicate that WssGBLUP is an appropriate method for traits with a large quantitative trait loci effect.

Download Full-text