scholarly journals Managed Long-Term Care Services: A Playbook Innovation or a Hail Mary?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 453-453
Author(s):  
Larry Polivka ◽  
Robert Applebaum

Abstract The approach to providing long-term services and supports (LTSS) has changed dramatically over the last three decades in both the financing and delivery arenas. In the U.S., long-term strategies have varied by state in organizational structure, scope of delivery and administrative practices. In the past two decades an additional change has emerged with over half the states adopting some form of managed LTSS. This shift has deepened the divide in state approaches to LTSS system design and delivery. The shift to managed LTSS has been largely fueled by ideological expectations and concerns about growing Medicaid costs: Empirical research findings have played a minimal role. For example, the large CMS evaluation conducted in this area did not include Medicaid data or encounter data from the managed care plans as part of the study efforts. However, the managed LTSS experiment does create an opportunity to compare costs and outcomes of these different models of financing and delivery. This symposium will present preliminary evaluation findings from two states, Ohio and Pennsylvania, which are generating data to assess both the implementation and outcomes of these alternative LTSS models. To set the context an initial paper will discuss the expansion of managed LTSS programs across the nation and examine how these efforts compare to the development occurring in the European LTSS systems. The third presentation will discuss the results of the Community Catalyst dual eligibles’ managed care demonstration program monitoring project.

2020 ◽  
pp. 073346482094306
Author(s):  
Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld ◽  
Anne Seltzer ◽  
Ana Ramirez ◽  
Ruqayyah Muhammad ◽  
Lee A. Lindquist

Many older adults wish to age-in-place but do not have long-term care plans for when they may require more assistance. PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL) is an evidence-based tool that helps older adults understand and plan for their long-term care needs. We examined the long-term effects of PYL use on user perceptions and planning of long-term care services. Individuals who previously accessed PYL were invited to complete an online, nation-wide mixed methodology survey about end-user outcomes related to PYL. Among 115 completed surveys, users found PYL helpful with long-term planning for their future needs. Over half of website users reported having conversations with others because of PYL use. However, 40% of respondents reported not having a conversation with others about their plans; common themes for barriers to planning included procrastination and a lack of immediate support needs. Although PYL helps with planning, many people are still not communicating their long-term care plans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 159-159
Author(s):  
Janette Dill ◽  
Bianca Frogner

Abstract The crisis of COVID-19 in long-term care services and supports (LTSS) has brought attention to challenges in staffing long-term care organizations, as shortages of direct care workers led to a dramatic inability to provide needed care for many residents in nursing homes and other residential care settings. In this study, we examine unemployment among LTSS direct care workers during the crisis and recovery. This study uses monthly data from January 2019 to December 2020 from the Current Population Survey, a monthly household survey collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and we compare an individual’s 2019 monthly employment patterns to their 2020 monthly employment. Long-term care workers had an unemployment rate of 2.8% in April 2020, when unemployment rates in the US reached a peak; however, new unemployment among long-term care workers has not declined as consistently as in other settings. Female health care workers were significantly more likely to be unemployed compared to their male counterparts, a trend that is consistent with the overall economy, and workers who earned the lowest wages were more likely to have transitioned to unemployment. COVID-19 has added significant complexity to the provision of direct care services, making LTSS a hazardous place to work. Concerns remain about unemployment in long-term care where demand for workers remains high; additional measures need to be taken to ensure that direct care workers have the resources they need to remain employed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalayne J. Arias ◽  
Ana M. Tyler ◽  
Benjamin J. Oster ◽  
Jason Karlawish

Previously diagnosed by symptoms alone, Alzheimer's disease is now also defined by measures of amyloid and tau, referred to as “biomarkers.” Biomarkers are detectible up to twenty years before symptoms present and open the door to predicting the risk of Alzheimer's disease. While these biomarkers provide information that can help individuals and families plan for long-term care services and supports, insurers could also use this information to discriminate against those who are more likely to need such services. In this article, we evaluate whether state laws prohibit long-term care insurers from making discriminatory or unfair underwriting and coverage decisions based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers status. We report data demonstrating that current state laws do not provide meaningful protections from discrimination by long-term care insurers based on biomarker information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document