Flipped Classroom Versus Traditional Lecture

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 320-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rieneke Holman ◽  
Alexandra D. Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Traditional Lecture

scholarly journals Comparison of Pharmaceutical Calculations Learning Outcomes Achieved Within a Traditional Lecture or Flipped Classroom Andragogy

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 70 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Glenn Anderson ◽  
Lisa Frazier ◽  
Stephanie L. Anderson ◽  
Robert Stanton ◽  
Chris Gillette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Traditional Lecture

scholarly journals Comparison of traditional lecture and flipped classroom for teaching programming

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Pawelczak
Keyword(s):  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Course Design ◽  
Work Load ◽  
Traditional Lecture ◽  
Active Involvement ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Evaluation Feedback ◽  
The One ◽  
Learning Programming ◽  
Programming Courses

Programming courses in undergraduate education seem to be predestined for a flipped classroom approach as learning programming requires a high personal contribution on the one hand and on the other hand, course participants typically start with a wide range of previous knowledge and skills. Within a flipped classroom students can organize their learning phases self-reliantly and put an individual amount of effort into each learning objective. Whilst in a traditional lecture it is not easy to motivate students, the flipped classroom requires students’ active involvement per se. Besides all these advantages, setting up such a course requires a high initial effort for the lecturer. Furthermore, students might prefer a lecture, as usually the work load is higher in a comparable flipped classroom course. Based on the idea of flipping a beginners programming course, we firstly explored the effects of a flipped classroom approach on an elective advanced pro­gram­ming course with a smaller student group. The paper compares the new course design and its effects on the students learning, on the teaching, as well as on the course preparation with the former traditional lecture. The com­parison is based on a survey, the students’ evaluation feedback and on the examination results. 

How Students in a First-Year Composition Course Respond to the Flipped Classroom

2016 ◽  
pp. 1405-1425
Author(s):  
Christina R. Grimsley
Keyword(s):  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
College Writing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Video Technology ◽  
Traditional Lecture ◽  
Course Content ◽  
Entry Level ◽  
First Year Composition ◽  
Composition Course ◽  
Writing Course

This qualitative pilot study investigated how 19 students enrolled in an entry-level college writing course responded to the use of video technology to supplement and flip class curriculum. Students were provided 10 video podcasts to augment course content and flip four class lessons. Collected through six student surveys and video download data, the results, including students' podcast viewership behaviors and attitudes toward the videos, are presented. The data revealed the college writing students involved in this study were generally satisfied with the flipped classroom and preferred it over the traditional lecture format. Download patterns indicated, however, less than half of the students watched the podcasts. Despite low viewership, the results suggest that the incorporation of video technology brings writing teachers opportunities to optimize class time by delving deeper into course content and by expanding the number of course assignments.

scholarly journals “A little flip goes a long way” The impact of a ‘partial’-flipped classroom design on student performance and engagement in a first year undergraduate economics classroom

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Singh
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Control Group ◽  
First Year ◽  
Classroom Design ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
Traditional Lecture ◽  
Traditional Lectures ◽  
Undergraduate Economics ◽  
The Impact

The flipped classroom is gaining prominence as an active learning pedagogy to engage a new generation of students. However, all courses do not lend themselves to a fully flipped design and instructors are often reluctant to flip lectures. In this study, I experimented with a “partial” flipped classroom design in a first-year undergraduate economics course. In this partial flipped format, traditional lectures were substituted with micro-lectures and the remaining class time was devoted to activities like quizzes, group work and student presentations. The full lectures were panopto recorded and put up on the e-learning site, Blackboard. This format enabled me to combine the benefits of a traditional lecture with a flipped classroom design. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the partial flipped classroom format, I compared the final exam scores of students in the partial flipped classroom with those in the control group, which followed a traditional lecture-based approach. The key results from the analysis revealed that students in the partial flipped classroom performed better in the final exams vis-à-vis students in the traditional classroom format. Furthermore, the partial flipped classroom format was associated with lower odds of students failing in the module. This format also resulted in better student engagement, more flexibility and enhanced student-tutor interaction within the classroom.

scholarly journals Flipped classroom versus traditional lecture in training undergraduates in pediatric epilepsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 4805
Author(s):  
VirenderKumar Gehlawat ◽  
Vandana Arya ◽  
Radhamohan Rana ◽  
Jayashankar Kaushik
Keyword(s):  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Pediatric Epilepsy ◽  
Traditional Lecture

The Peer Instruction Flipped Learning Model

2016 ◽  
pp. 285-307
Author(s):  
Troy Faulkner ◽  
Jennifer Green
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Peer Instruction ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Flipped Learning ◽  
Group Discussions ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Student Centered Learning ◽  
Traditional Lecture

Peer instruction flipped learning blends the concepts of flipped classroom and peer instruction in order to maximize the strengths of both techniques. Peer Instruction, a student-centered learning approach developed by Eric Mazur of Harvard University, engages students in the learning process through small group discussions. Flipped classroom, credited largely to Jon Bergmann and Aaron Sams, reverses the roles of traditional lecture and “homework” in order to maximize student learning. This chapter discusses the research on peer instruction and flipped learning, the details of implementing the peer instruction flipped learning model, and the benefits of using a peer instruction flipped learning model. This chapter also details one high school's experiences with these strategies.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of flipped classroom combined with team-, case-, lecture- and evidence-based learning on ophthalmology teaching for eight-year program students

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Ding ◽  
Shengguo Li ◽  
Baihua Chen
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Standardized Tests ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Teaching Model ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Traditional Lecture ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Clinical Thinking

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the benefits and challenges of the flipped classroom combined with team-, case-, lecture- and evidence-based learning (FC-TCLEBL) for ophthalmology teaching for eight-year program students. Methods FC-TCLEBL and the traditional lecture-based classroom (LBC) were compared based on student and teacher feedback questionnaires, student learning burden, and scores on standardized tests as well as their effects on the abilities of clinical thinking, scientific research, active-learning, practical application, humanistic care and communication with patients. Results Both the students and teachers were more satisfied with the FC-TCLEBL model. More students in the FC-TCLEBL group agreed that the course helped them to develop skills in creative thinking, problem solving, and teamwork. Students in the FC-TCLEBL group spent significantly more time preparing for class than those in the LBC group, but the time spent on review was significantly lower in the FC-TCLEBL group. The students from the FC-TCLEBL group performed better in a post-test on diabetic retinopathy (DR) as compared to the LBC group. Conclusions FC-TCLEBL teaching model is effective and suitable for ophthalmology teaching.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document