scholarly journals Interactions and Localization of Escherichia coli Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV after DNA Damage

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (17) ◽  
pp. 2792-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mallik ◽  
Ellen M. Popodi ◽  
Andrew J. Hanson ◽  
Patricia L. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACTEscherichia coli's DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB), a member of the Y family of error-prone polymerases, is induced during the SOS response to DNA damage and is responsible for translesion bypass and adaptive (stress-induced) mutation. In this study, the localization of Pol IV after DNA damage was followed using fluorescent fusions. After exposure ofE. colito DNA-damaging agents, fluorescently tagged Pol IV localized to the nucleoid as foci. Stepwise photobleaching indicated ∼60% of the foci consisted of three Pol IV molecules, while ∼40% consisted of six Pol IV molecules. Fluorescently tagged Rep, a replication accessory DNA helicase, was recruited to the Pol IV foci after DNA damage, suggesting that thein vitrointeraction between Rep and Pol IV reported previously also occursin vivo. Fluorescently tagged RecA also formed foci after DNA damage, and Pol IV localized to them. To investigate if Pol IV localizes to double-strand breaks (DSBs), an I-SceI endonuclease-mediated DSB was introduced close to a fluorescently labeled LacO array on the chromosome. After DSB induction, Pol IV localized to the DSB site in ∼70% of SOS-induced cells. RecA also formed foci at the DSB sites, and Pol IV localized to the RecA foci. These results suggest that Pol IV interacts with RecAin vivoand is recruited to sites of DSBs to aid in the restoration of DNA replication.IMPORTANCEDNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB) is an error-prone DNA polymerase capable of bypassing DNA lesions and aiding in the restart of stalled replication forks. In this work, we demonstratein vivolocalization of fluorescently tagged Pol IV to the nucleoid after DNA damage and to DNA double-strand breaks. We show colocalization of Pol IV with two proteins: Rep DNA helicase, which participates in replication, and RecA, which catalyzes recombinational repair of stalled replication forks. Time course experiments suggest that Pol IV recruits Rep and that RecA recruits Pol IV. These findings providein vivoevidence that Pol IV aids in maintaining genomic stability not only by bypassing DNA lesions but also by participating in the restoration of stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals RuvAB and RecG Are Not Essential for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis Following UV-Induced DNA Damage in Escherichia coli

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 1631-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet R Donaldson ◽  
Charmain T Courcelle ◽  
Justin Courcelle
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Dna Junctions ◽  
Fork Regression

Abstract Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.

scholarly journals Single-molecule live-cell imaging reveals RecB-dependent function of DNA polymerase IV in double strand break repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (15) ◽  
pp. 8490-8508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S Henrikus ◽  
Camille Henry ◽  
Amy E McGrath ◽  
Slobodan Jergic ◽  
John P McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv

Abstract Several functions have been proposed for the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV (pol IV). Although much research has focused on a potential role for pol IV in assisting pol III replisomes in the bypass of lesions, pol IV is rarely found at the replication fork in vivo. Pol IV is expressed at increased levels in E. coli cells exposed to exogenous DNA damaging agents, including many commonly used antibiotics. Here we present live-cell single-molecule microscopy measurements indicating that double-strand breaks induced by antibiotics strongly stimulate pol IV activity. Exposure to the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim leads to the formation of double strand breaks in E. coli cells. RecA and pol IV foci increase after treatment and exhibit strong colocalization. The induction of the SOS response, the appearance of RecA foci, the appearance of pol IV foci and RecA-pol IV colocalization are all dependent on RecB function. The positioning of pol IV foci likely reflects a physical interaction with the RecA* nucleoprotein filaments that has been detected previously in vitro. Our observations provide an in vivo substantiation of a direct role for pol IV in double strand break repair in cells treated with double strand break-inducing antibiotics.

scholarly journals Regulation of Rtt107 Recruitment to Stalled DNA Replication Forks by the Cullin Rtt101 and the Rtt109 Acetyltransferase

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania M. Roberts ◽  
Iram Waris Zaidi ◽  
Jessica A. Vaisica ◽  
Matthias Peter ◽  
Grant W. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

RTT107 (ESC4, YHR154W) encodes a BRCA1 C-terminal domain protein that is important for recovery from DNA damage during S phase. Rtt107 is a substrate of the checkpoint kinase Mec1, and it forms complexes with DNA repair enzymes, including the nuclease subunit Slx4, but the role of Rtt107 in the DNA damage response remains unclear. We find that Rtt107 interacts with chromatin when cells are treated with compounds that cause replication forks to arrest. This damage-dependent chromatin binding requires the acetyltransferase Rtt109, but it does not require acetylation of the known Rtt109 target, histone H3-K56. Chromatin binding of Rtt107 also requires the cullin Rtt101, which seems to play a direct role in Rtt107 recruitment, because the two proteins are found in complex with each other. Finally, we provide evidence that Rtt107 is bound at or near stalled replication forks in vivo. Together, these results indicate that Rtt109, Rtt101, and Rtt107, which genetic evidence suggests are functionally related, form a DNA damage response pathway that recruits Rtt107 complexes to damaged or stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals PrimPol is required for replication reinitiation after mtDNA damage

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (43) ◽  
pp. 11398-11403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Torregrosa-Muñumer ◽  
Josefin M. E. Forslund ◽  
Steffi Goffart ◽  
Annika Pfeiffer ◽  
Gorazd Stojkovič ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Translesion Synthesis ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Mtdna Damage ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Mtdna Replication ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks ◽  
Lagging Strand

Eukaryotic PrimPol is a recently discovered DNA-dependent DNA primase and translesion synthesis DNA polymerase found in the nucleus and mitochondria. Although PrimPol has been shown to be required for repriming of stalled replication forks in the nucleus, its role in mitochondria has remained unresolved. Here we demonstrate in vivo and in vitro that PrimPol can reinitiate stalled mtDNA replication and can prime mtDNA replication from nonconventional origins. Our results not only help in the understanding of how mitochondria cope with replicative stress but can also explain some controversial features of the lagging-strand replication.

scholarly journals UvrD Participation in Nucleotide Excision Repair Is Required for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis following UV-Induced Damage inEscherichia coli

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelley N. Newton ◽  
Charmain T. Courcelle ◽  
Justin Courcelle
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Nucleotide Excision ◽  
Fork Regression

UvrD is a DNA helicase that participates in nucleotide excision repair and several replication-associated processes, including methyl-directed mismatch repair and recombination. UvrD is capable of displacing oligonucleotides from synthetic forked DNA structuresin vitroand is essential for viability in the absence of Rep, a helicase associated with processing replication forks. These observations have led others to propose that UvrD may promote fork regression and facilitate resetting of the replication fork following arrest. However, the molecular activity of UvrD at replication forksin vivohas not been directly examined. In this study, we characterized the role UvrD has in processing and restoring replication forks following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage. We show that UvrD is required for DNA synthesis to recover. However, in the absence of UvrD, the displacement and partial degradation of the nascent DNA at the arrested fork occur normally. In addition, damage-induced replication intermediates persist and accumulate inuvrDmutants in a manner that is similar to that observed in other nucleotide excision repair mutants. These data indicate that, following arrest by DNA damage, UvrD is not required to catalyze fork regressionin vivoand suggest that the failure ofuvrDmutants to restore DNA synthesis following UV-induced arrest relates to its role in nucleotide excision repair.

scholarly journals Role of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase IV in In Vivo Replication Fidelity

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (14) ◽  
pp. 4802-4807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Kuban ◽  
Piotr Jonczyk ◽  
Damian Gawel ◽  
Karolina Malanowska ◽  
Roel M. Schaaper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Error Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv

ABSTRACT We have investigated whether DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV; the dinB gene product) contributes to the error rate of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli. We compared mutation frequencies in mismatch repair-defective strains that were either dinB positive or dinB deficient, using a series of mutational markers, including lac targets in both orientations on the chromosome. Virtually no contribution of Pol IV to the chromosomal mutation rate was observed. On the other hand, a significant effect of dinB was observed for reversion of a lac allele when the lac gene resided on an F′(pro-lac) episome.

scholarly journals A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1643-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshil R. Patel ◽  
Robert S. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Eukaryotic cells continuously experience DNA damage that can perturb key molecular processes like DNA replication. DNA replication forks that encounter DNA lesions typically slow and may stall, which can lead to highly detrimental fork collapse if appropriate protective measures are not executed. Stabilization and protection of stalled replication forks ensures the possibility of effective fork restart and prevents genomic instability. Recent efforts from multiple laboratories have highlighted several proteins involved in replication fork remodeling and DNA damage response pathways as key regulators of fork stability. Homologous recombination factors such as RAD51, BRCA1, and BRCA2, along with components of the Fanconi Anemia pathway, are now known to be crucial for stabilizing stalled replication forks and preventing nascent strand degradation. Several checkpoint proteins have additionally been implicated in fork protection. Ongoing work in this area continues to shed light on a sophisticated molecular pathway that balances the action of DNA resection and fork protection to maintain genomic integrity, with important implications for the fate of both normal and malignant cells following replication stress.

scholarly journals Prevention of unwanted recombination at damaged replication forks

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1045-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl P. Lehmann ◽  
Alberto Jiménez-Martín ◽  
Dana Branzei ◽  
José Antonio Tercero
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Alternative Mode ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract Homologous recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity but must be strictly controlled to avoid dangerous outcomes that produce the opposite effect, genomic instability. During unperturbed chromosome replication, recombination is globally inhibited at ongoing DNA replication forks, which helps to prevent deleterious genomic rearrangements. This inhibition is carried out by Srs2, a helicase that binds to SUMOylated PCNA and has an anti-recombinogenic function at replication forks. However, at damaged stalled forks, Srs2 is counteracted and DNA lesion bypass can be achieved by recombination-mediated template switching. In budding yeast, template switching is dependent on Rad5. In the absence of this protein, replication forks stall in the presence of DNA lesions and cells die. Recently, we showed that in cells lacking Rad5 that are exposed to DNA damage or replicative stress, elimination of the conserved Mgs1/WRNIP1 ATPase allows an alternative mode of DNA damage bypass that is driven by recombination and facilitates completion of chromosome replication and cell viability. We have proposed that Mgs1 is important to prevent a potentially harmful salvage pathway of recombination at damaged stalled forks. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of how unwanted recombination is prevented at damaged stalled replication forks.

The Bacillus subtilis PriA winged helix domain is critical for surviving DNA damage

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Matthews ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Human Pathogens ◽  
Winged Helix ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication forks regularly encounter lesions or other impediments that result in a blockage to fork progression. PriA is one of the key proteins used by virtually all eubacteria to survive conditions that result in a blockage to replication fork movement. PriA directly binds stalled replication forks and initiates fork restart allowing for chromosomes to be fully duplicated under stressful conditions. We used a CRISPR-Cas gene editing approach to map PriA residues critical for surviving DNA damage induced by several antibiotics in B. subtilis . We find that the winged helix (WH) domain in B. subtilis PriA is critical for surviving DNA damage and participates in DNA binding. The critical in vivo function of the WH domain mapped to distinct surfaces that were also conserved among several Gram-positive human pathogens. In addition, we identified an amino acid linker neighboring the WH domain that is greatly extended in B. subtilis due to an insertion. Shortening this linker induced a hypersensitive phenotype to DNA damage, suggesting that its extended length is critical for efficient replication fork restart in vivo . Because the WH domain is dispensable in E. coli PriA, our findings demonstrate an important difference in the contribution of the WH domain during fork restart in B. subtilis . Further, with our results we suggest that this highly variable region in PriA could provide different functions across diverse bacterial organisms. IMPORTANCE PriA is an important protein found in virtually all bacteria that recognizes stalled replication forks orchestrating fork restart. PriA homologs contain a winged helix (WH) domain which is dispensable in E. coli and functions in a fork restart pathway that is not conserved outside of E. coli and closely related proteobacteria. We analyzed the importance of the WH domain and an associated linker in B. subtilis and found that both are critical for surviving DNA damage. This function mapped to a small motif at the C-terminal end of the WH domain, which is also conserved in pathogenic bacteria. The motif was not required for DNA binding and therefore may perform a novel function in the replication fork restart pathway.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document