Impact of Induction Treatment on Stem Cell Collection: A COVID Related Study

Abstract Introduction: Standard induction therapy for multiple myeloma consists of 3-6 cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). Receiving greater than 6 cycles of a lenalidomide containing regimen is thought to negatively impact the ability to collect sufficient CD34+ stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (Kumar, Dispenzieri et al. 2007, Bhutani, Zonder et al. 2013). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at least 20 patients at University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCC) had transplant postponed, potentially resulting in prolonged exposure to lenalidomide containing induction regimens. Here, in the context of modern stem cell mobilization methods, we describe a retrospective study that suggests prolonged induction does not inhibit adequate stem cell collection for transplant. Methods: By chart review, we identified 56 patients with multiple myeloma who received induction with VRd or KRd and underwent apheresis or stem cell transplant at UMGCC between 10/1/19 and 10/1/20. Patients were excluded if they received more than 2 cycles of a different induction regimen, had a past medical history of an inborn hematological disorder, or participated in a clinical trial of novel stem cell mobilization therapy. We defined 1 cycle of VRd or KRd as 1 cycle of "lenalidomide containing regimen". In accordance with routine clinical practice, we defined standard induction as having received 3-6 cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen and prolonged induction as having received 7 or more cycles. Results: 29 patients received standard induction (Standard induction cohort) and 27 received prolonged induction (Prolonged induction cohort) with lenalidomide containing regimens. The median number of cycles received by the Standard cohort was 6 (range 4-6), and the median number of cycles received by the Prolonged cohort was 8 (range 7-13). The frequency of KRd use was similar between patients who received standard induction and prolonged induction (27.58% vs. 25.93%, respectively). Standard induction and Prolonged induction cohorts were similar with respect to clinical characteristics (Fig 1), as well as the mobilization regimen used for stem cell collection (p = 0.6829). 55/56 patients collected sufficient stem cells for 1 transplant (≥ 4 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg), and 40/56 patients collected sufficient cells for 2 transplants (≥ 8 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg). There was no significant difference in the total CD34+ stem cells collected at completion of apheresis between standard and prolonged induction (10.41 and 10.45 x 10 6 CD34 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.968, Fig 2). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the number of cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen a patient received and total CD34+ cells collected (R 2 = 0.0073, p = 0.5324). Although prolonged induction did not affect final stem yield, prolonged induction could increase the apheresis time required for adequate collection or result in more frequent need for plerixafor rescue. There was no significant difference in the total number of stem cells collected after day 1 of apheresis between patients who received standard or prolonged induction (8.72 vs. 7.96 x 10 6 cells/kg, respectively, p = 0.557). However, patients who received prolonged induction were more likely to require 2 days of apheresis (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.1625) and there was a trend toward significance in which patients who received prolonged induction underwent apheresis longer than patients who received standard induction (468 vs 382 minutes, respectively, p = 0.0928, Fig 3). In addition, longer apheresis time was associated with more cycles of lenalidomide containing regimen, which neared statistical significance (R 2 = 0.0624, p = 0.0658, Fig 4). There was no significant difference between standard and prolonged induction with respect to the frequency of plerixafor rescue. Conclusions: Prolonged induction with lenalidomide containing regimens does not impair adequate stem cell collection for autologous transplant. Prolonged induction may increase the apheresis time required to collect sufficient stem cells for transplant, but ultimately clinicians should be re-assured that extending induction when necessary is not likely to increase the risk of collection failure. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badros: Janssen: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Effect of lenalidomide induction therapy on peripheral blood stem cell collection in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6549 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6549-6549

Author(s):

Divaya Bhutani ◽

Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽

Judith Abrams ◽

Voravit Ratanatharathorn ◽

Joseph P. Uberti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Median Number ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Number Of Cycles ◽

Stem Cell Collection

6549 Background: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains part of standard therapy for Multiple Myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide (LEN) is a newer, effective therapy for MM. It has been suggested that prior LEN therapy is associated with an increased risk of stem cell collection failure, particularly when only G-CSF is used for mobilization. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 310 consecutive MM pts who underwent pheresis to collect stem cells for first ASCT between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute. We compared differences in quantity of CD34 cells collected, days needed to collect the target number of cells (> 2.5 x 10*6 CD34+ cells/kg), days to platelet and neutrophil engraftment. We also evaluated the association between CD34+ cells collected and the number of cycles of LEN therapy. Results: Of 310 patients, 90% were mobilized with only G-CSF initially. Patients were analyzed as two groups: LEN exposed (LEN(+); n = 128) and LEN naive(LEN(-); n = 182). Median age in both groups was 58 years. No differences in race, sex and MM stage distribution were observed between the two groups. The median number of stem cells collected in the LEN(+) group was significantly less than the LEN(-) group (6.46 vs. 7.56 x 10*6 CD34 cells/kg; p= 0.0004). In addition, the median number of pheresis sessions required for adequate stem cell collection were significantly more in the LEN(+)group as compared to LEN(-) group (2 vs.1 sessions; p=0.002). In the LEN(+) group, there was a negative correlation between CD34+ cells collected and the prior number of cycles of LEN (p=0.0001). There was no statistically significant excess in the number of stem cell collection failures with G-CSF in the LEN(+) group (7% vs. 4% p=0.31). All pts who failed collection after G-CSF were successfully collected with Cytoxan or Plerixafor priming. LEN exposure had no effect on post-ASCT neutrophil or platelet recovery. Conclusions: Although Lenalidomide exposure is associated with a slightly lower CD34+ stem cell yield and on average an extra session of pheresis when G-CSF is used for mobilization, collection failure is uncommon and post-ASCT engraftment is normal.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Chemotherapy + G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2258.2258 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2258-2258

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

Morton Coleman ◽

David Bernstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Yield ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4516.4516 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4516-4516

Author(s):

Esha Kaul ◽

Gunjan L Shah ◽

Chakra P Chaulagain ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

High Dose ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Non Interventional Prospective Clinical Study on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Relapsed Lymphomas

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3852.3852 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3852-3852

Author(s):

Gwendolyn van Gorkom ◽

Herve Finel ◽

Sebastian Giebel ◽

David Pohlreich ◽

Avichai Shimoni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Clinical Study ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Prospective Clinical Study ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Relapsed Lymphoma ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for many patients with relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma. Peripheral blood stem cells have become the main source for the ASCT worldwide, because of its advantages over bone marrow. Several risk factors have been identified for poor stem cell mobilization, and diagnosis of lymphoma is one of the most important ones, with an inadequate stem cell harvest reported in 4 to 25% of the cases. Even though stem cell mobilization in relapsed lymphoma patients can be relatively difficult, mobilization strategies have not been standardized and there is a significant variation amongst centers. The aim of this non-interventional prospective clinical study was to review the mobilization strategies used by EBMT centers in relapsed lymphoma and to evaluate the failure rates. Methods: All EBMT centers were invited to participate in this non-interventional prospective clinical study that was started in 2010 and ended in 2014. Centers were requested to collect data on all consecutive patients with relapsed lymphoma considered to be candidates for an ASCT and were 18 years of age or older. Data collected included age, sex, diagnosis, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, mobilization regimen, collected CD34+ cells and marrow harvests. Results: In total, 275 patients with relapsed lymphoma from 30 EBMT centers were registered for this study. There were 158 males and 117 females with a median age of 51 (range 18 – 77) years; 181 patients (66%) with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (DLBCL 28%, FL 17%, MCL 6%, PTL, 3%, other 12%) and 94 patients (34%) with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The median number of chemotherapy lines received before this relapse was one (range 1 – 8). 263 patients (96%) were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF being DHAP (43%) and ESHAP (11%) the most frequent protocols, and 12 patients (4%) were mobilized with G-CSF alone. Thirteen patients (5%) who were mobilized with chemotherapy + G-CSF, received additional PLX in the first mobilization. These were all patients that were mobilized with chemotherapy as part of the mobilization regimen. Thirty patients (11%) failed to mobilize adequate stem cells (<2 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg) during first mobilization despite the use of PLX in four patients. The median number of stem cells collected at first mobilization was 5.6 x 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0 – 82). In 255 patients (92.7%) only one mobilization course was given, 18 patients (6.5%) had two mobilization courses, 2 patients (0.7%) underwent three mobilization courses. Three patients had a mobilization failure after only G-CSF; they all were successfully harvested in a second attempt after chemotherapy + G-CSF. Five of the patients failing the first mobilization with chemotherapy + G-CSF received PLX at second mobilization, but only three succeeded. One patient failed both first and second mobilization and received PLX at third mobilization without success. 22 patients (8%) still had an inadequate amount of stem cells in the end. Of those, only 4 patients (1.5%) underwent bone marrow harvest. Conclusion: In the EBMT centers participating in this study, a primary mobilization strategy based on the combination of salvage chemotherapy plus G-CSF was used for virtually all patients with relapsed lymphoma. PLX was used in only 5% of the mobilization procedures during the time period analyzed. With 11% after the first mobilization attempt and 8% after several attempts, the failure rate was relatively low. Disclosures van Gorkom: Sanofi: Research Funding. Sureda:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bendamustine (Treanda®), Etoposide and Dexamethasone (BED) Followed by GCSF Effectively Mobilizes Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4126.4126 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4126-4126

Author(s):

Damian J. Green ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

Leona Holmberg ◽

Theodore A. Gooley ◽

Brian G. Till ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Cross Resistance ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Predictable Pattern ◽

Pbsc Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 4126 Background: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for patients with advanced or treatment refractory multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Stem cell proliferation and mobilization can be enhanced though the addition of myelosuppressive chemotherapy to GCSF administration. Chemotherapeutic agents without cross resistance to prior therapies may support peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and improve patient outcomes by exacting a more potent direct anti-tumor effect prior to ASCT. Bendamustine (Treanda®) is a synthetic chemotherapeutic agent that shares structural similarities to both purine analog and alkylating agents without significant cross resistance to other compounds in either drug class. Bendamustine appears to have low stem cell toxicity in vitro, is well tolerated, and has activity in MM and NHL. We hypothesized that bendamustine's activity in patients with disease resistant to first line therapies makes it a logical candidate for chemotherapy based PBSC mobilization. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory MM, B-cell NHL or T-cell NHL and were candidates for ASCT. Other criteria included: age >18 years, ANC >1,500/mm3, platelets >100,000/mm3, adequate renal and hepatic function, <3 prior myelotoxic regimens, <6 cycles of lenalidomide, no prior failed mobilization attempt, and no prior pelvic/spinal irradiation. Patients received 1 cycle of BED therapy [bendamustine (120 mg/m2 IV d 1, 2 - provided along with financial support for this study by Teva Pharmaceuticals), etoposide (200 mg/m2 IV d 1– 3), dexamethasone (40 mg PO d 1– 4), delivered as an outpatient, followed by filgrastim (10 mcg/kg/day; starting on d 5 through end of collection)]. Apheresis was initiated when peripheral blood CD34 cell counts were >5/μL. The primary endpoint was successful mobilization, defined as collection of >2.0 × 106CD34 cells/kg. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the CTCAE v4.0. Results: Twenty patients (16 MM, 3 B-cell NHL, 1 NK/T-cell NHL) were treated. The median age was 59 years (range 43–70), and the median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1–3) for MM and 2 (range 2–3) for NHL patients. All patients (20/20) were successfully mobilized. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 19.11 × 106/kg (Mean 22.49; range 4.35 to 55.51 × 106). All MM patients collected >10 × 106 CD34+cells/kg. The median time from BED mobilization therapy to the first day of CD34 stem cell collection was 12 days (mean 12.05; range 10 to 20 days). The median number of days of apheresis was 1 (mean 1.45; range 1 to 4). A predictable pattern of leucocyte nadir and recovery was demonstrated (88% of patients started apheresis between days 10–12). One patient (5%) was given plerixafor and for 2 patients (10%) the dose of GCSF was increased to 16 mcg/kg twice daily. Among the 20 patients mobilized and collected, 12 have thus far undergone ASCT and 100% (12/12) have achieved an unsupported neutrophil count >500/μL at an average of 14.3 days after PBSC infusion and a platelet count >20K/μL at an average of 10 days. Serious AEs (SAEs) were observed in 5 patients and 1 patient died due to disease progression. No unexpected grade 3 or greater treatment related SAEs were seen. Disease response assessments are ongoing. The original protocol design involved 3 agents (bendamustine, dexamethasone and GCSF [BDG]). After the first 3 patients enrolled, the mobilization regimen was modified to include etoposide because BDG did not yield a predictable pattern of leucocyte nadir and recovery, thus complicating timing for apheresis (median time to collection 22 days). The first 3 patients were censored from the analysis, however all 3 patients were successfully mobilized and collected. Conclusions: The initial experience with PBSC mobilization after BED in this phase II study suggests the regimen is safe and effective, while the use of BDG does not yield predictable CD34 kinetics. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment after ASCT appears unimpaired when compared with other chemotherapy based mobilization regimens. Large numbers of stem cells were rapidly mobilized and resulted in short durations of apheresis. No patient with MM collected <10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (sufficient for 2 ASCTs). The regimen was very well tolerated and these findings suggest that the role of bendamustine in PBSC mobilization should be further explored. Disclosures: Green: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Holmberg:Millenium: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Budde:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Gopal:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Mobilization of Stem Cells with DT-PACE Plus Pegfilgrastim vs. DT-PACE Plus Filgrastim in Previously Treated MM Patients.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.1972.1972 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 1972-1972

Author(s):

Guido Tricot ◽

Maureen Reiner ◽

Michael Burns ◽

Maurizio Zangari ◽

Frits van Rhee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Median Number ◽

Test Time ◽

Hematopoietic Growth Factors ◽

Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Incidence Analysis ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Mobilization with chemotherapy (CT) plus hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) is superior to mobilization with HGFs only. For stem cell mobilization after chemotherapy HGFs are typically given once or twice a day for approximately 14 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with DT-PACE plus pegfilgrastim was equivalent to mobilization with DT-PACE + filgrastim. Patients analyzed were enrolled in two consecutive studies 2001–12 (N=97) and 2003–41 (N=72) and included only patients who had received ≥ 2 cycles of prior therapy, but no prior transplant. Both protocols employed a single cycle of induction with DT-PACE (Lee et al. JCO2003;21:2732) followed by stem cell collection with either filgrastim 5μg/kg bid until completion of stem cell collection (2001–12) or pegfilgrastim 6mg on days 6 and 13 (2003–41). Patients then proceeded with tandem transplants, one consolidation cycle with DT-PACE and two years of maintenance with thalidomide (100mg daily) and dexamethasone (4 mg/day, days 1–4 q 3 weeks). Group characteristics were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis test. Time to hematopoietic recovery after transplantation was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier plots, and comparison was performed using the logrank statistic. The two studies had comparable characteristics, except that more patients ≥ 65 years were enrolled in 2003–41 (35% vs 13%; p=.001). The median number of collection days was 2 in both studies (p=.8). The median number of CD34 cells/kg (x106) collected per day was 9.7 (2001–12) vs 12.7 (2003–41) (p=.2). The total number of CD34 cell/kg (x106) collected was 20.4 (2001–12) versus 25.4 (2003–41) (p=.2). The median number of CD34 cells/kg (x106) infused after the first transplant was 4.1 (2001–12) and 4.5 (2003–41) (p=.5). The time to recover ANC > 500/μl and platelets > 20,000/μl without transfusion was shorter for 2003–41 patients (13 versus 15 days; p< .0001) (Figure 1). Mobilization of PBSC with pegfilgrastim is easier for patients because they only receive 2 injections and is as effective as filgrastim when combined with DT-PACE. Moreover, mobilization with pegfilgrastim may result in a more rapid hematologic recovery after transplantation. Cumulative incidence analysis Recovery of ANC to 500 and Platelets > 20K 2003-41 vs. 2001-12, Transplant 1 Cumulative incidence analysis Recovery of ANC to 500 and Platelets > 20K 2003-41 vs. 2001-12, Transplant 1

Download Full-text

The Effect of Rituximab on Mobilization with AMD3100 Plus G-CSF in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory NHL or HD.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.1912.1912 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 1912-1912

Author(s):

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Amanda M. Cook ◽

Christopher Flowers ◽

Amelia A. Langston ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Median Number ◽

High Dose ◽

High Dose Therapy ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Dose Therapy ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract The optimal therapy for patients with chemotherapy sensitive relapsed or refractory lymphoma is high dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell rescue. Rituximab (R) has been added to salvage regimens to increase response rate, thereby making more patients eligible for high dose therapy. However, when R is used prior to the salvage regimen, it has been associated with a delay in platelet engraftment (Hoerr et al, J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22:4561–6). We have previously noted in a retrospective review of 117 patients with lymphoma treated with high dose therapy and autologous HSC transplant that concurrent treatment with R did not impact stem cell collection or post transplant engraftment (Kaufman et al, BBMT, February 2005, Sup 1, [11.2] 6). AMD3100 (plerixafor) is a CXCR4 inhibitor that, when used with G-CSF, more effectively mobilizes stem cells than G-CSF alone. In order to test the hypothesis that R does not negatively impact stem cell collection or post-transplant engraftment when AMD3100 is used with G-CSF, we performed a prospective trial of the use of AMD3100, G-CSF and R for patients with CD20 (+) relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma versus the use of AMD3100 and G-CSF for patients with CD20 (−) relapsed chemosensitive lymphoma. Patients were treated with 2 cycles of ICE ± R depending on CD20 status of the malignant cell. Patients who had a response proceeded to mobilization with AMD3100 and G-CSF for the CD20 (−) group (Arm A) or AMD3100, G-CSF, and four weekly doses of R at 375 mg/m2 (two doses prior to G-CSF and AMD3100, and two doses after) for the CD20 (+) group (Arm B). After collection, patients were treated with high dose therapy with targeted intravenous busulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide followed by autologous HSC transplantation. Patient demographics, mobilization characteristics, graft yield, engraftment data, and toxicity were assessed. 21 patients have been accrued. 11 in Arm A (10 Hodgkin Lymphoma {HL} and 1 with Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma) and 10 in Arm B (2 HL and 7 NHL, and 1 with a composite HL/NHL). The median number of days of collection was 2 for each arm. The median CD34 (+) collected was 4.64 * 106 CD34+ cells/kg in Arm A compared to 5.25 * 106 CD34+ cells/kg in Arm B (p=0.6) The median number of CD34(+)/CD38(−) was similar for both arms. As expected from in vivo B-cell depletion, the percentage of CD19 (+) cells in the product was decreased in Arm B compared to Arm A (2.24% vs. 0.09%, p<0.002). R treated patients did not experience increased serious adverse events. All patients in both arms had durable and equivalent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (Table 1). In conclusion, rituximab can be administered safely to patients when AMD3100 and G-CSF are used for collection of hematopoietic stem cells. Importantly, no negative impact on graft characteristics or engraftment was perceived. Further trials are planned. Table 1: Engraftment Arm A Arm B p value N 11 10 CD 20 status negative positive Median Day to Neutrophil Engraftment 12 11.5 0.39 Median Day to Platelet Engraftment 17 17 0.72 Median Day 100 Total WBC 4.0 3.5 0.55 Median Day 100 Platelet Count 179 178 0.77

Download Full-text

Plerixafor and G-CSF Versus Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2146.2146 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2146-2146 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Aziz Nazha ◽

Rachel Cook ◽

Dan T. Vogl ◽

Patricia A. Mangan ◽

Kimberly Hummel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Incomplete Data ◽

Median Number ◽

Stem Cell Mobilization ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Long Term Outcome ◽

Cell Mobilization ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2146 Poster Board II-123 Introduction: High dose melphalan and autologus stem cell transplant remains an effective treatment for patients with either early or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Collection of sufficient numbers of stem cells for more than one transplant is optimal. G-CSF with chemotherapy, particularly cyclophosphamide (CY/G-CSF), has been a widely used and effective regimen for stem cell collection in MM. Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, when combined with G-CSF has been shown in a large randomized clinical trial to be superior to G-CSF alone. A comparison of plerixifor/G-CSF to CY/G-CSF is presented here. Materials and Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective analysis of 365 patients with MM who underwent stem cell mobilization and harvest at the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center from January 2002 to December 2007. All patients were harvested early in the course of their disease. 76 patients were excluded from this analysis (23 had incomplete data on induction regimen, 19 had incomplete data on stem cell collection, 16 had incomplete data on mobilization regimen, 10 underwent allogeneic transplants, 2 had bone marrow rather than peripheral blood harvests, 2 had stem cells collected at an outside institution, 2 had chemotherapy mobilization other than CY and 2 had medical complications prior to harvest and after mobilization). Therefore, 289 patients were included in the analysis; 16 received plerixafor/G-CSF, 198 received CY/G-CSF, and 75 received G-CSF alone. Results: The median number of collected stem cells was 7.95 × 106 CD34+/kg in plerixafor/G-CSF group, 7.7 × 106 CD34+/kg in Cy/G-CSF group and 4.5 × 106 CD34+/kg in G-CSF alone group. The median number of apheresis days was 2 days, 2 days and 4 days respectively. The percentage of the patients who collected ≥ 6 × 106 CD34+/kg in < 3 apheresis was 63% (10/16), 62% (123/198) and 19% (14/75) respectively. The percentage of the patients who collected ≥ 6 × 106CD34+/kg <5 apheresis was 81% (13/16), 69% (136/198) and 23% (17/75) respectively. The mean CD34+/kg collected erither after CY/G-CSF or plerixafor/G-CSF was higher than G-CSF alone (p<0.0001 for each analysis). Conclusion: This analysis suggests that plerixafor/G-CSF and CY/G-CSF mobilization result in similar and adequate stem cell harvest numbers for autologous stem cell transplantation for MM. Both approaches are superior to G-CSF alone. The choice of plerixafor/G-CSF vs CY/G-CSF for stem cell mobilization will therefore depend on further analysis of the relative costs, toxicities and long term outcome of these regimens. Disclosures: Stadtmauer: genzyme: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Utility of Plerixafor In Addition to Chemotherapy and G-CSF Mobilization Regimens

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4443.4443 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4443-4443

Author(s):

Farrukh Awan ◽

David Deremer ◽

Elaine Mebel ◽

Samith Thomas Kochuparambil ◽

Anand P. Jillella

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 4443 Introduction: Various chemotherapeutic agents particularly cyclophosphamide (CY) are utilized in combination with growth factors in an attempt to increase the number of stem cells available for collection in the peripheral blood. Plerixafor (P) is a reversible antagonist of CXCR4 and interrupts its interaction with SDF-1. This results in a rapid release of hematopoietic stem cells from the marrow to the circulation. Recent pivotal phase III trial data has established the efficacy of P in combination with G-CSF (G) in patients who had failed prior attempts at stem cell collection. However, there is limited data about the utility of plerixafor in patients who are being mobilized with chemotherapy and G. Method: In this single institution study of uniformly treated patients we describe our experience with the use of P as a salvage option in patients who fail to optimally mobilize CD34+ cells (>5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). Patients received CY (3-4 g/m2) followed by GCSF (10 mcg/kg) from day 1 to day 10. Thirteen patients (6 NHL, 4 MM, 2 Hodgkin lymphoma, 1 Ewings sarcoma) received salvage P from 2008–2010. Their outcomes were compared with 10 matched, historic controls mobilized with (CY n=8; CY + etoposide n=1; CY + topotecan n=1) plus G-CSF (10mcg/kg/d) identified from our institutional database. Data was collected on mobilization and transplant outcomes and analyzed utilizing SPSS version 13.0. Patients receiving P were closely matched to historic controls (CY+G). Result: Both groups were similar with regards to age, gender, disease type, prior therapies and performance status (p>0.05 for all). Patients in the P arm received a median of 2.5 doses (range 1–8). The mean CD34+ count was 21.5cells/ul in the P arm and 32.5 cells/ul in the CY+G arm (p=0.2). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the average number of apheresis sessions in the P vs. CY+G arms (4.2 vs. 4.4, p=0.8) or the total number of CD34+ stem cells collected (4.0×106/kg vs. 3.9×106/kg, p=0.9). However, 7 out of the 13 patients who received P did have an increase of >10 CD34+ cells/ul in their peripheral blood. Utilizing a cut-off of 5×106 CD34+/kg, 3 (23%) patients in the P arm and 3 (30%) patients in the CY+G arm had a successful harvest. Three NHL patients required >4 doses of P, but all eventually collected >2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment dynamics were similar in both groups of patients. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days for both groups, p=0.8, and to platelet engraftment was 22 days vs. 20.5 days, p=0.1, respectively for P vs. CY+G. Conclusion: Our limited single-center retrospective case-controlled outcomes data, suggests that when compared with CY+G, the addition of P as a salvage agent does not significantly improve mobilization outcomes. Further evaluation is needed to combine P with CY+G in terms of optimal timing and potentially dosing of chemotherapy agents utilized. We suggest that the combination P+G would provide better potential outcomes such as improved collection and less hospitalization and reduce the use of chemo-mobilization prior to an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with Lenalidomide: A Single-Institution Experience Using An Intermediate-Dose Cyclophosphamide-Based Regimen

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4391.4391 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4391-4391

Author(s):

Asif Alavi ◽

Rada Grubovic ◽

Gary J. Schiller

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Treated Group ◽

Median Number ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Peripheral Stem Cells

Abstract Abstract 4391 Background: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells plays an important role in the management of intermediate- and advanced-stage multiple myeloma. In order for successful engraftment to occur, adequate numbers of high quality peripheral stem cells must be harvested prior to transplantation. Mobilization of PBSC in patients treated with lenalidomide has been associated with poor apheresis collections after G-CSF mobilization. The purpose of this study is to present our institution’s experience utilizing an intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide-based mobilization regimen. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at UCLA between 2006 and 2010. Data were obtained from the database of the UCLA Heme Malignancy/Stem Cell Transplant Unit, the electronic health record system and stem cell processing laboratory. All patients underwent mobilization with a regimen of cyclophosphamide 2.5g/m2 IVPB, G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day for 4 days SQ, and prednisone 2mg/kg/day for 4 days po. The number of CD 34+ cells was used as a marker for the number of peripheral stem cells collected. Minimum dose collected to ensure adequate engraftment was 2×106/kg CD34+ cells. Patients were conditioned with melphalan 100mg/m2/d x2 (unless there was evidence of renal failure, in which case the dose was reduced to 100mg/m2) with subsequent infusion of stem cells. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first day of absolute neutrophil count greater than 500×106/L ≥ 7 days after transplant. Results: Autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 103 patients with multiple myeloma at UCLA between 2006 and 2010. Median number of apheresis procedures was 1 (1–12) with a median of 4.4×106/kg (1.4–33.5) CD34+ cells collected. Median time to engraftment was 10 (8–18) days. Thirty-five patients received lenalidomide at some point in their pretransplant treatment. Median number of apheresis procedures was 1 in both lenalidomide and non lenalidomide treated groups. In the lenalidomide treated group 54% required only one collection versus 75% in the non lenalidomide treated group (p=0.033). In the lenalidomide treated group 31% required 3 more or more collections versus 10% in non lenalidomide treated group (p=0.0075). Three patients in the lenalidomide group had subsequent mobilization with plerixafor with one of these requiring bone marrow harvesting. Median CD34+ cells collected was 3.5×106/kg and 4.9×106/kg (p=0.246) in the lenalidomide and non-lenalidomide groups respectively. Both groups had a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 10 days with a similar range. Conclusion: Pre-transplant use of lenalidomide adversely affected the number of stem cell apheresis procedures required to procure adequate stem cell dose as evidenced by a greater percentage requiring 3 or more collections. However, despite prior lenalidomide exposure, the use of our mobilization regimen permitted adequate collection, with the majority of patients requiring only one apheresis procedure, and led to an equivalent time to neutrophil recovery. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for mobilization of stem cells.

Download Full-text