scholarly journals Options for an environmental risk assessment of intentional and unintentional chemical mixtures under REACH: the status and ways forward

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enken Hassold ◽  
Wiebke Galert ◽  
Jona Schulze

AbstractIt is acknowledged that a variety of chemicals enter the environment and may cause joint effects. Chemicals regulated under the European Chemicals Regulation REACH are often part of formulated mixtures and during their processing and use in various products they can be jointly released via sewage treatment plants or diffuse sources, and may combine in the environment. One can differentiate between intentional mixtures, and unintentional mixtures. In contrast to other substance-oriented legislations, REACH contains no explicit requirements for an assessment of combined effects, exposures and risks of several components. Still, it requires ensuring the safe use of substances on their own, in mixtures, and in articles. The available options to address intentional as well as unintentional mixtures are presented and discussed with respect to their feasibility under REACH, considering the responsibilities, communication tasks and information availability of the different actors (registrants, downstream-user and authorities). Specific mixture assessments via component-based approaches require a comprehensive knowledge on substances properties, uses, fate and behaviour, and the composition of the mixture under consideration. This information is often not available to the responsible actor. In principle, intentional mixtures of known composition can be assessed by the downstream-user. But approaches have to be improved to ensure a transparent communication and sound mixture assessment. In contrast, unintentional mixtures appear to be better addressable via generic approaches such as a mixture allocation factor during the chemical safety assessment, although questions on the magnitude, implementation and legal mandates remain. Authorities can conduct specific mixture risk assessments in well-defined and prioritized cases, followed by subsequent regulatory measures. In order to address intentional and unintentional mixtures within the current REACH framework, legal mandates together with guidance for the different actors are needed. Furthermore, further data on mixture compositions, uses and co-exposures need to be made accessible via shared databases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Madia ◽  
A Worth ◽  
M Whelan ◽  
R Corvi

Abstract The rising rates of cancer incidence and prevalence identified by the WHO are of serious concern. The scientific advances of the past twenty years have helped to describe major properties of the cancer disease, enabling therapies that are more sophisticated. It has become clear that the management of relevant risk factors can also significantly reduce cancer occurrence worldwide. Public health policy actions cannot be decoupled from environmental policy actions, since exposure to chemicals through air, soil, water and food can contribute to cancer as well as other chronic diseases. Furthermore, due to the increasing global trend of chemical production including novel compounds, chemical exposure patterns are foreseen to change, posing high demands on chemical safety assessment, and creating potential protection gaps. The safety assessment of carcinogenicity needs to evolve to keep pace with changes in the chemical environment and cancer epidemiology. The presentation focusses on EC-JRC recommendations and future strategies for carcinogenicity safety assessment. This also includes discussion on how the traditional data streams of regulatory toxicology, together with new available assessment methods can inform, along with indicators of public health status based on biomonitoring and clinical data, a more holistic human-relevant and impactful approach to carcinogenicity assessment and overall prevention of cancer disease.


2021 ◽  
pp. 126438
Author(s):  
Luana de Morais e Silva ◽  
Vinicius M. Alves ◽  
Edilma R.B. Dantas ◽  
Luciana Scotti ◽  
Wilton Silva Lopes ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Reynolds ◽  
Carl Westmoreland ◽  
Julia Fentem

New informatics capabilities and computational and mathematical modelling techniques, used in combination with highly sensitive molecular biology and mechanistic chemistry approaches, are transforming the way in which we assess the safety of chemicals and products. In recent years, good progress has been made in replacing some of the animal tests required for regulatory purposes with methods using cells and tissues in vitro. Nevertheless, big scientific challenges remain in developing relevant non-animal models able to predict the effects of chemicals which are absorbed systemically. The greatest breakthroughs in non-animal approaches for chemical safety assessment will most likely result from continued multi-disciplinary research investment in predictive (integrative and systems) biology. Some of our current research in this area is described in the present article.


2015 ◽  
Vol 238 (2) ◽  
pp. S169-S170
Author(s):  
M. Cronin ◽  
F. Bois ◽  
E. Fioravanzo ◽  
T. Meinl ◽  
D. Neagu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document