scholarly journals Sequential transarterial chemoembolization and early radiofrequency ablation improves clinical outcomes for early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma in a 10-year single-center comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangliang Yan ◽  
Yanqiao Ren ◽  
Kun Qian ◽  
Xuefeng Kan ◽  
Hongsen Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Tace Treatment

Abstract Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective treatment methods for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is still a lack of clinical research on whether early sequential RFA, compared with late combination therapy, can improve the long-term efficacy of initial TACE treatment. Methods This retrospective study investigated a cohort of patients who underwent combination therapy using TACE and RFA (TACE followed by RFA) from January 2010 to January 2020 at our medical centre. A total of 96 patients underwent TACE combined with early RFA (usually during the first hospitalization), which was called TACE + eRFA. Thirty-four patients received 1–2 palliative TACE treatments first and then underwent TACE treatment combined with late RFA (TACE + lRFA). All patients continued to receive palliative TACE treatments after intrahepatic lesion progression until reaching intolerance. The overall survival (OS) rate, time to tumour progression (TTP), tumour response rate and major complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results There were significant differences in the median OS (46 months vs 33 months; P = 0.013), median TTP (28 months vs 14 months; P < 0.00), objective response rate (ORR) (89.6% vs 61.8%, P = 0.000) and disease control rate (DCR) (94.8% vs 73.5% P = 0.002) between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage was an independent risk factor for OS. Meanwhile, multivariable analysis revealed that TACE + eRFA was associated with an enhanced TTP. Conclusion Early sequential RFA treatment in patients with early-intermediate HCC can improve local tumour control and clinical outcomes while reducing the frequency of TACE treatment. In clinical practice, in HCC patients initially treated with TACE, it is recommended to combine RFA as soon as possible to obtain long-term survival.

scholarly journals Superselective Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable or “Ablation Unsuitable” Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Caudate Lobe: A Real World, Single-Center Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangliang Yan ◽  
Yanqiao Ren ◽  
Kun Qian ◽  
Xuefeng Kan ◽  
Hongsen Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Caudate Lobe ◽  
Complication Rates

ObjectivesTo analyze the clinical outcomes of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable or “ablation unsuitable” hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe (CL) found at initial presentation in clinical practice.MethodsFifty-eight patients with HCC-CL undergoing conventional TACE from January 2015 to January 2020 were enrolled in our medical center. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rate and major complication rates were analyzed. Multivariate analyses for potential clinical and radiologic factors were performed by using the Cox proportional hazard model.ResultsThe median OS was 23 months (95%CI: 18.1-27.9), and the median PFS was 11 months (95%CI: 7.4-14.6). The 1-, 3-, and 5-years OS rates were 66.5%, 31.9% and 15.7%, respectively. The 0.5, 1-, and 3-years PFS rates were 60.3%, 44.5% and 6.3%, respectively. Objective response rate was 53.4% and disease control rate was 79.3%. The most serious complication was bile duct injury, with an incidence of 3.4%. Multivariable analysis revealed that total bilirubin, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, nonselective chemoembolization and TACE session were four significant factors associated with OS.ConclusionsSuperselective TACE treatment might be associated with better survival benefits in unresectable or “ablation unsuitable” HCC in the CL without macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) and adequate liver function, compared with the non-selective TACE group, and should be considered as an important reliable therapy for surgeons and interventional radiologists.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Ablation Following Downstaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using Transarterial Chemoembolization: Long-term Outcomes

Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 293 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Shi ◽  
Ming Wu ◽  
Shan-Shan Lian ◽  
Zhi-Qiang Mo ◽  
Qing Gou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Laparoscopic Hepatectomy (with or without Robotic Assistance) versus Radiofrequency Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment for Very Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charing Ching-Ning Chong ◽  
Kit-Fai Lee ◽  
Cheuk-Man Chu ◽  
Anthony Wing-Hung Chan ◽  
Simon Chun-Ho Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy

Background: The advantages of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) over hepatectomy as a treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include reduced morbidity and more rapid recovery. Although minimally invasive surgery provides similar benefits, few studies have compared the long-term oncological outcomes of these techniques. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) and RFA. Methods: Patients who underwent MIH or RFA for HCC between January 2005 and January 2015 were included in a propensity score matching analysis. Only patients who underwent minimally invasive procedures for small HCC were included. Baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were retrieved from the hospital database and analyzed. Results: Two hundred and twenty-five patients underwent MIH or RFA for HCC during the study period. Propensity score matching yielded 59 patient-pairs. The complication rates did not differ statistically between the 2 groups (p = 0.309). However, MIH provided significantly better overall (p = 0.005) and disease-free survival outcomes (p < 0.001) than RFA. Conclusions: Compared with RFA, MIH provided better long-term survival outcomes in patients with early-stage HCC, with no increase in the incidence of complications. When feasible, MIH should be considered a first-line treatment for this patient population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document