scholarly journals Core set of unfavorable events of proximal humerus fracture treatment defined by an international Delphi consensus process

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Audigé ◽  
Stig Brorson ◽  
Holger Durchholz ◽  
Simon Lambert ◽  
Fabrizio Moro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) complications, whether following surgery or nonoperative management, require standardization of definitions and documentation for consistent reporting. We aimed to define an international consensus core event set (CES) of clinically-relevant unfavorable events of PHF to be documented in clinical routine practice and research. Methods A Delphi exercise was implemented with an international panel of experienced shoulder trauma surgeons selected by survey invitation of AO Trauma members. An organized list of PHF events after nonoperative or operative management was developed and reviewed by panel members using on-line surveys. The proposed core set was revised regarding event groups along with definitions, specifications and timing of occurrence. Consensus was reached with at least a two-third agreement. Results The PHF consensus panel was composed of 231 clinicians worldwide who responded to at least one of two completed surveys. There was 93% final agreement about three intraoperative local event groups (device, osteochondral, soft tissue). Postoperative or nonoperative event terms and definitions organized into eight groups (device, osteochondral, shoulder instability, fracture-related infection, peripheral neurological, vascular, superficial soft tissue, deep soft tissue) were approved with 96 to 98% agreement. The time period for documentation ranged from 30 days to 24 months after PHF treatment depending on the event group and specification. The resulting consensus was presented on a paper-based PHF CES documentation form. Conclusions International consensus was achieved on a core set of local unfavorable events of PHF to foster standardization of complication reporting in clinical research and register documentation. Trial registration Not applicable.

Author(s):  
Bhavik Y. Dalal ◽  
Dipalkumar V. Rathod ◽  
Raghav Suthar ◽  
Harshal Damor

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of Philos plate and to specifically study the clinical outcome of the patient treated with Philos plate for proximal humerus fracture on the radiological head shaft angle basis.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 40 cases of proximal humerus fracture fixed by using Philos plate were reviewed.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Average constant shoulder score as Neer type-3 fracture is 83.8% and for type- 4 part fracture is 86%. Average radiological union was seen at 10.2 weeks. There was no major difference in clinical and radiological union. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Good functional outcome with Philos plate irrespective of fracture type was obtained.</span></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
George El Rassi ◽  
Nabil Dib ◽  
Joseph Maalouly ◽  
Rita Moukarzel ◽  
Dany Aouad

Proximal humerus fracture is a common orthopedic presentation, with bimodal age distribution. On the other hand, bilateral proximal humerus fracture dislocation is a rarely reported pathology, especially when it is not the result of direct trauma. We present a case of a 71-year-old female patient found to have simultaneous bilateral 4-part proximal humerus fractures following status epilepticus treated surgically with bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty with constraint and soft tissue release. In a patient with recurrent status epilepticus episodes, the combination of constrained reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the extensive soft tissue release should decrease the rate of failure and dislocation dramatically. We conclude, after reviewing the literature, that there is no straightforward algorithm for treating such patients and that a clear classification should take into account both bone quality and patient comorbidities which has yet to be developed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211
Author(s):  
Eric B. Wilkinson ◽  
Johnathan F. Williams ◽  
Kyle D. Paul ◽  
Jun Kit He ◽  
Justin R. Hutto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932199274
Author(s):  
Hyojune Kim ◽  
Myung Jin Shin ◽  
Erica Kholinne ◽  
Janghyeon Seo ◽  
Duckwoo Ahn ◽  
...  

Purpose: This biomechanical study investigates the optimal number of proximal screws for stable fixation of a 2-part proximal humerus fracture model with a locking plate. Methods: Twenty-four proximal humerus fracture models were included in the study. An unstable 2-part fracture was created and fixed by a locking plate. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were used for the following 4 groups based on the number of screws used: 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups. Interfragmentary gaps were measured following cyclic loading and compared. Consequently, the load to failure, maximum displacement, stiffness, and mode of failure at failure point were compared. Results: The interfragmentary gaps for the 4-screw, 6-screw, 7-screw, and 9-screw groups were significantly reduced by 0.24 ± 0.09 mm, 0.08 ± 0.06 mm, 0.05 ± 0.01 mm, and 0.03 ± 0.01 mm following 1000 cyclic loading, respectively. The loads to failure were significantly different between the groups with the 7-screw group showing the highest load to failure. The stiffness of the 7-screw group was superior compared with the 6-screw, 9-screw, and 4-screw groups. The maximum displacement before failure showed a significant difference between the comparative groups with the 4-screw group having the lowest value. The 7-screw group had the least structural failure rate (33.3%). Conclusion: At least 7 screws would be optimal for proximal fragment fixation of proximal humerus fractures with medial comminution to minimize secondary varus collapse or fixation failure. Level of Evidence: Basic science study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document