scholarly journals Transfer of communication teaching skills from university to the clinical workplace – does it happen? A mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Ege Møller ◽  
Louise Binow Kjaer ◽  
Emma Helledie ◽  
Lone Folmer Nielsen ◽  
Bente Vigh Malling

Abstract Background Communication skills learned in the classroom do not transfer easily into clinical practice because they are not reinforced by teachers in the workplace setting and because lack of faculty training restricts the transfer of communication skills in real patient encounters. Trained university-based communication skills teachers often work simultaneously as doctors in clinics. This study explored if and how the skills of these teachers play a role in communication skills training in the clinical workplace. Methods We used an exploratory sequential design: a mixed method approach that combined a survey with communication skills teachers, and qualitative individual interviews with these teachers and their educational leaders in clinical departments. The questionnaire was analysed using descriptive statistics. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. Results The response rate was 34 %. A majority (93 %) used their communication skills when communicating with patients and relatives. Less than half taught communication in clinical departments. Approximately half of the respondents stated that encouragement from their leaders or colleagues would inspire them to use their teaching skills in the workplace. However, only 20 % had told their leaders about their competencies in teaching communication. One third thought that they needed further teacher training to teach in the clinical workplace. Qualitative analysis showed that teaching opportunities existed but mainly consisted of random, one-off sessions that came about through the initiative of the communication skills teachers themselves. The teachers described several barriers, such as the challenge of teaching colleagues, as communication relates to identity and hierarchical structures, as well as a lack of requests from colleagues or management, and department culture prioritizing topics relating to medical expertise. None of the educational leaders made use of the teachers’ specific communication skills in a structured way: some saw it as unimportant, while others saw it as a potential resource. Conclusion Transfer of the teaching skills of communication skills teachers trained for university-based clinical communication training happened, but to a limited degree. Although both opportunities and barriers for transferring communication skills existed, barriers seemed to dominate, and opportunities for communication skills training in the workplace setting were not used to their full potential.

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireille Schaufelberger ◽  
Peter Frey ◽  
Ulrich Woermann ◽  
Kai Schnabel ◽  
Jürgen Barth

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rock ◽  
Nina Gadmer ◽  
Robert Arnold ◽  
David Roberts ◽  
Asha Anandaiah ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (20) ◽  
pp. 2166-2172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiko Fujimori ◽  
Yuki Shirai ◽  
Mariko Asai ◽  
Kaoru Kubota ◽  
Noriyuki Katsumata ◽  
...  

Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the effects of a communication skills training (CST) program for oncologists, developed based on patient preferences regarding oncologists' communication. Participants and Methods Thirty oncologists were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (IG; 2-day CST workshop) or control group (CG). Participants were assessed on their communication performance during simulated consultation and their confidence in communicating with patients at baseline and follow-up. A total of 1,192 patients (response rate, 84.6%) who had consultations with the participating oncologists at baseline and/or follow-up were assessed regarding their distress using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, satisfaction with the consultation, and trust in their oncologist after the consultation. Results At the follow-up survey, the performance scores of the IG had improved significantly, in terms of their emotional support (P = .011), setting up a supportive environment (P = .002), and ability to deliver information (P = .001), compared with those of the CG. Oncologists in the IG were rated higher at follow-up than those in the CG in terms of their confidence in themselves (P = .001). Patients who met with oncologists after they had undergone the CST were significantly less depressed than those who met with oncologists in the CG (P = .027). However, the CST program did not affect patient satisfaction with oncologists' style of communication. Conclusion A CST program based on patient preferences is effective for both oncologists and patients with cancer. Oncologists should consider CST as an approach to enhancing their communication skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 210 (6) ◽  
pp. 438-438
Author(s):  
Philippa Ditton-Phare ◽  
Brian Kelly ◽  
Carmel L. Loughland

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-688
Author(s):  
Erin Silva ◽  
Jane Coffee ◽  
Nina Bickell ◽  
Kerin Adelson ◽  
Dena Schulman-Green

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
L.V. Sakhno ◽  
V.I. Orel ◽  
I.V. Koltuntseva ◽  
A.G. Rykachevskaya ◽  
T.V. Mishkina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document