Regional hyperthermia (RHT) improves response and survival when combined with systemic chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced, high grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, the body wall and the abdomen: A phase III randomised pros

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10009-10009 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Issels ◽  
L. H. Lindner ◽  
P. Wust ◽  
P. Hohenberger ◽  
K. Jauch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Body Wall ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
The Body ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival

10009 Background: Patients (Pts) with locally advanced, high-grade STS are at significant risk for local failure and for metastasis. We evaluated the ability of RHT to improve the outcome in pts who are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Eligibility included pts with STS = 5 cm, grade II/III, deep and extracompartmental, stratified according to site (E = extremity vs. Non-E = body wall and abdomen). Pts were randomly assigned to systemic chemotherapy (etoposide 250 mg/m2; ifosfamide 6 g/m2; adriamycin 50 mg/m2) alone (EIA) or to systemic chemotherapy combined with RHT (EIA + RHT) administered for 4 cycles every 3 weeks both prior and after local aggressive therapy (surgery + radiotherapy), respectively. Primary endpoints were local progression free survival (LPFS) and disease free survival (DFS). Objective (CR + PR) response rate (ORR) evaluated after 4 cycles (EIA vs EIA + RHT) was a secondary endpoint. A total of 340 pts was required to show an improvement in median LPFS of 19.2 mos for EIA + RHT (a=5% type I, 20% type II error). Results: Pts characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. After median follow-up of 24.9 months (mos) an intention-to-treat analysis showed a significantly superior DFS for pts who received EIA + RHT (n=169) compared to those treated with EIA alone (n=172) (median DFS: 31,7 mos and 16,2 mos; log-rank p=0.003; Hazard ratio=0.65; CI95=0.48- 0.87, p=0.004). The median LPFS was estimated 45,3 mos for EIA + RHT and 23,7 mos for EIA (log-rank p=0.015; Hazard ratio=0.66; CI95=0.48 - 0.90, p=0.01). At 2 years, LPFS rates for E (149 pts) and for Non-E (192 pts) were significantly better for EIA + RHT vs EIA alone (E: 84% vs 64%; Non-E: 57% vs 39%) (p<0.02). The ORR was significantly better for EIA + RHT (28,7%) vs EIA alone (12,6%) (p=0.002). Conclusions: Compared to chemotherapy alone, RHT combined with chemotherapy yields a statistically significant improvement in tumor response , DFS and LPS, in patients with locally advanced, high-grade STS. (Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe and HGF VH-VI- 140) [Table: see text]

Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Low-Dose Daily Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Nebojsa Nikolic ◽  
Aleksandar Dagovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m2) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65). RESULTS: Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P = .041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P = .0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients. CONCLUSION: As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

624 A PHASE III STUDY ON NEOADJUVANT TORIPALIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RESECTABLE ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zheng ◽  
Jiangong Zhang ◽  
Wenqun Xing
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract   In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in the treatment of ESCC. More than 20 phase II clinical trials have been launched to explore combinations of ICIs in the neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. Based on our phase II clinical trial, a two-arm phase III trial was launched in our Hospital. Methods A two-arm phase III trial was launched in April 2020 in our Hospital. Patient recruitment will be completed within 18 months. The primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) rate, overall response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, major pathologic response (MPR), adverse events (AEs), complication rate and quality of life (QOL). A biobank of pretreatment, resected tumor tissue and paired blood samples will be built for translational research in the future. Results Until Dec. 2021, one hundred and twenty ESCC patients recruited in the trial. The trial is ongoing. Conclusion This RCT directly compares NAC with neoadjuvant toripalimab plus chemotherapy in terms of EFS for locally advanced ESCC. The results may usher in a new era of resectable ESCC treatment.

Phase III study of local or systemic therapy INtensification DIrected by PET in prostate CAncer patients with post-prostaTEctomy biochemical recurrence (INDICATE): ECOG-ACRIN EA8191.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5098-TPS5098
Author(s):  
Neha Vapiwala ◽  
Yu-Hui Chen ◽  
Steve Y. Cho ◽  
Fenghai Duan ◽  
Christos Kyriakopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prostate Bed

TPS5098 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (STAD) is considered a standard of care (SOC) salvage therapy (ST) paradigm for prostate cancer (PC) patients (pts) with post-prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). Fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging is FDA-approved in this setting, with improved accuracy for detection of metastases not identified with conventional imaging (CIM). Given PET's greater sensitivity and specificity, its findings are increasingly but variably applied to justify modification or omission of SOC therapies without high-level evidence of clinical benefit. PET may help identify candidates for local or systemic treatment intensification of the otherwise non-tailored SOC approach. Improved systemic control and disease detection with molecular imaging have led to increasing use of focally ablative metastasis-directed RT, to delay or enhance systemic therapy through increased local control. There is also interest in earlier use of systemic therapy; apalutamide (Apa) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with established efficacy in improving overall and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) for non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic castration-sensitive PC. This study will evaluate whether pts with PET-detected lesions benefit from such local or systemic treatment intensification approaches. Methods: PC pts with post-RP BCR (PSA>0.5ng/mL; >0.2ng/mL if within 12 mos of RP) and no metastases on CIM who are candidates for SOC ST (RT to prostate bed and pelvic nodes with STAD) are eligible. Prior to study registration, pts undergo SOC baseline PET (18F-fluciclovine but PSMA radiotracers permitted pending commercial availability). Based on institutional clinical interpretation of the SOC PET, pts will be placed in Cohort 1 (PET-negative) or 2 (PET-positive for extra-pelvic metastases). Cohort 1 will be randomized to SOC ST +/- Apa for 6 months and Cohort 2 will be randomized to SOC ST and Apa +/- metastasis-directed RT to PET-positive lesions. The primary endpoint is PFS, defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression on CIM, symptomatic disease or death. Primary objectives are to evaluate whether addition of Apa to SOC ST and addition of metastasis-directed RT to SOC ST and Apa could prolong PFS in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. For Cohort 1, 480 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 90% (Apa arm) vs. 80% (SOC arm) using one-sided stratified log-rank test with type I error of 0.025. For Cohort 2, 324 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 76.5% in the experimental arm from 61.5% in the control arm. Secondary endpoints include overall and event-free survival, toxicity, and PET progression. Clinical trial information: NCT04423211.

Positron Emission Tomography–Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2024-2034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
Stefan Müller ◽  
Bernd Hertenstein ◽  
Henrike Thomssen ◽  
Jörg Kotzerke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Interim positron emission tomography (PET) using the tracer, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose, may predict outcomes in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. We assessed whether PET can guide therapy in patients who are treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). Patients and Methods Newly diagnosed patients received two cycles of CHOP—plus rituximab (R-CHOP) in CD20-positive lymphomas—followed by a PET scan that was evaluated using the ΔSUVmax method. PET-positive patients were randomly assigned to receive six additional cycles of R-CHOP or six blocks of an intensive Burkitt’s lymphoma protocol. PET-negative patients with CD20-positive lymphomas were randomly assigned or allocated to receive four additional cycles of R-CHOP or the same treatment with two additional doses rituximab. The primary end point was event-free survival time as assessed by log-rank test. Results Interim PET was positive in 108 (12.5%) and negative in 754 (87.5%) of 862 patients treated, with statistically significant differences in event-free survival and overall survival. Among PET-positive patients, 52 were randomly assigned to R-CHOP and 56 to the Burkitt protocol, with 2-year event-free survival rates of 42.0% (95% CI, 28.2% to 55.2%) and 31.6% (95% CI, 19.3% to 44.6%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.501 [95% CI, 0.896 to 2.514]; P = .1229). The Burkitt protocol produced significantly more toxicity. Of 754 PET-negative patients, 255 underwent random assignment (129 to R-CHOP and 126 to R-CHOP with additional rituximab). Event-free survival rates were 76.4% (95% CI, 68.0% to 82.8%) and 73.5% (95% CI, 64.8% to 80.4%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.048 [95% CI, 0.684 to 1.606]; P = .8305). Outcome prediction by PET was independent of the International Prognostic Index. Results in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were similar to those in the total group. Conclusion Interim PET predicted survival in patients with aggressive lymphomas treated with R-CHOP. PET-based treatment intensification did not improve outcome.

scholarly journals Three-year outcomes of the randomized phase III SEIPLUS trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for locally advanced gastric cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Guo ◽  
Aman Xu ◽  
Xiaowei Sun ◽  
Xuhui Zhao ◽  
Yabin Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

AbstractWhether extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) after gastrectomy is beneficial to patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is not clear. This phase 3, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective randomized study (NCT02745509) recruits patients between April 2016 and November 2017. Eligible patients who had been histologically proven AGC with T3/4NxM0 stage are randomly assigned (1:1) to either surgery alone or surgery plus EIPL. The results of the two groups are analyzed in the intent-to-treat population. A total of 662 patients with AGC (329 patients in the surgery alone group, and 333 in the surgery plus EIPL group) are included in the study. The primary endpoint is 3-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints include 3-year disease free survival (DFS), 3-year peritoneal recurrence-free survival (reported in this manuscript) and 30-day postoperative complication and mortality (previously reported). The trial meets pre-specified endpoints. Estimated 3-year OS rates are 68.5% in the surgery alone group and 70.6% in the surgery plus EIPL group (log-rank p = 0.77). 3-year DFS rates are 61.2% in the surgery alone group and 66.0% in the surgery plus EIPL group (log-rank p = 0.24). The pattern of disease recurrence is similar in the two groups. In conclusion, EIPL does not improve the 3-year survival rate in AGC patients.

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1064-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Jaiprakash Agarwal ◽  
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m2, and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with an intensive epirubicin-containing regimen

Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 3564-3573 ◽  
Author(s):  
KS Zuckerman ◽  
DC Jr Case ◽  
RA Gams ◽  
EF Prasthofer
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas

Abstract An intensive chemotherapy regimen (EVDAC), including high-dose epirubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone followed by cyclophosphamide and high-dose cytarabine, was administered to 54 untreated adults with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). The median age was 59, 61% were Ann Arbor Stage IV, 57% had “B” symptoms, 50% had serum lactate dehydrogenase greater than 250 U/L, and 48% had masses greater than 7 cm (33% > 10 cm) in diameter. Seventy-six percent of patients attained complete or probable complete remissions. The Kaplan- Meier actuarial failure-free survival at 7 years is 50%, and 59% (32 of 54) of all patients started on therapy remain alive and in first remission at a median of 62+ (range, 49+ to 76+) months from completion of therapy. Nearly all patients developed severe neutropenia. Febrile episodes requiring hospitalization during neutropenia occurred after 56% of courses of epirubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone and after 9% of courses of cyclophosphamide and cytarabine; 80% of patients were hospitalized at least once. Platelet count nadirs of less than 20,000/microL occurred after only 1 of 146 evaluable courses of epirubicin and after none of the cyclophosphamide/cytarabine courses. Although 8 patients had decreases of at least 0.12 in their left ventricular ejection fractions (5 to below normal levels), none have developed clinically evident congestive heart failure. Clinically significant mucositis occurred after only 8% of courses of high-dose epirubicin. Three deaths from infections and one from hyperkalemia with cardiac arrest occurred during therapy. These results confirm that high remission and sustained, failure-free survival rates can be achieved in patients with aggressive NHL, using high-dose anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens. Epirubicin appears to have an advantage over doxorubicin at high doses because of decreased toxicity at a therapeutically equivalent dose. These phase II study results need to be validated in a randomized phase III trial, and growth factors should be used to attempt to reduce the neutropenia-associated complications.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With N2 or N3 Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (25) ◽  
pp. 2735-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E.W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Jeffrey Mueller ◽  
Robyn Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Induction chemotherapy (IC) before radiotherapy lowers distant failure (DF) rates in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The goal of this phase III trial was to determine whether IC before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improves survival compared with CRT alone in patients with N2 or N3 disease. Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with nonmetastatic N2 or N3 SCCHN were randomly assigned to CRT alone (CRT arm; docetaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea plus radiotherapy 0.15 Gy twice per day every other week) versus two 21-day cycles of IC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC + CRT arm). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included DF-free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results A total of 285 patients were randomly assigned. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (9%); during CRT (both arms combined), they were mucositis (49%), dermatitis (21%), and leukopenia (18%). Serious adverse events were more common in the IC arm (47% v 28%; P = .002). With a minimum follow-up of 30 months, there were no statistically significant differences in OS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41), RFS, or DF-free survival. Conclusion IC did not translate into improved OS compared with CRT alone. However, the study was underpowered because it did not meet the planned accrual target, and OS was higher than predicted in both arms. IC cannot be recommended routinely in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced SCCHN.

scholarly journals RACE-trial: neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction - a randomized phase III joint study of the AIO, ARO and DGAV

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Lorenzen ◽  
Alexander Biederstädt ◽  
Ulrich Ronellenfitsch ◽  
Christoph Reißfelder ◽  
Stefan Mönig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background Despite obvious advances over the last decades, locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) still carry a dismal prognosis with overall 5-year survival rates of less than 50% even when using modern optimized treatment protocols such as perioperative chemotherapy based on the FLOT regimen or radiochemotherapy. Therefore the question remains whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is eliciting the best results in patients with GEJ cancer. Hence, an adequately powered multicentre trial comparing both therapeutic strategies is clearly warranted. Methods The RACE trial is a an investigator initiated multicenter, prospective, randomized, stratified phase III clinical trial and seeks to investigate the role of preoperative induction chemotherapy (2 cycles of FLOT: 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) with subsequent preoperative radiochemotherapy (oxaliplatin weekly, 5-FU plus concurrent fractioned radiotherapy to a dose of 45 Gy) compared to preoperative chemotherapy alone (4 cycles of FLOT), both followed by resection and postoperative completion of chemotherapy (4 cycles of FLOT), in the treatment of locally advanced, potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Patients with cT3–4, any N, M0 or cT2 N+, M0 adenocarcinoma of the GEJ are eligible for inclusion. The RACE trial aims to enrol 340 patients to be allocated to both treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio stratified by tumour site. The primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival assessed with follow-up of maximum 60 months. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, R0 resection rate, number of harvested lymph nodes, site of tumour relapse, perioperative morbidity and mortality, safety and toxicity and quality of life. Discussion The RACE trial compares induction chemotherapy with FLOT followed by preoperative oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation versus preoperative chemotherapy with FLOT alone, both followed by surgery and postoperative completion of FLOT chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the GEJ. The trial aims to show superiority of the combined chemotherapy/radiochemotherapy treatment, assessed by progression-free survival, over perioperative chemotherapy alone. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04375605; Registered 4th May 2020;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document