Thoracic Oncology: Current Standard Therapy and Future Developments

Author(s):  
Thomas E. Stinchcombe ◽  
Jeffrey D. Bradley
1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 179-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl P. Morgan ◽  
C.N. Williams

This report presents three unusual forms of resistant peptic ulcer disease, all healed completely with the use of a new class of anti-ulcer drug, a proton pump blocker, omeprazole. Each of these patients represents an unusual facet of acid-pepsin disease, namely, resistance to healing with current standard therapy, recurrence and rehealing with a second course of omcprazole, and a subsequent need for maintenance omeprazole to remain ulcer-free. The first patient had an unusual complication of a stomal ulcer after gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. This ulcer proved to be intractable, not healing with standard therapy, but healing with omeprazole, and subsequently recurring. A second course of therapy resulted in complete rehealing, but maintenance therapy with omeprazole was necessary to prevent ulcer recurrence. The second patient had rheumatoid arthritis and an NSAID associated chronic gastric ulcer which did not heal with standard therapy. A course of omeprazole resulted in complete healing; however, the ulcer recurred. A second course of omeprazole was necessary which led to complete healing, and subsequent maintenance therapy has kept this patient ulcer-free for the past 18 months. The third patient had recurrent circumferential esophageal ulcers following esophageal variceal sclerotherapy along with primary biliary cirrhosis. These ulcers took five months to heal on conventional therapy, but treatment with omeprazole resulted in healing within a three month time frame, and maintenance omeprazole has since kept this patient free from esophageal ulcers.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (22) ◽  
pp. 5059-5060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hallek

A randomized phase 3 trial conducted in France and Belgium shows that a chemoimmunotherapy consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab (FCA) causes an excess mortality and is less efficient compared with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR), the current standard therapy for physically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).1,2


Author(s):  
Sho Tamai ◽  
Nozomi Hirai ◽  
Shabierjiang Jiapaer ◽  
Takuya Furuta ◽  
Mitsutoshi Nakada

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors. Among them, glioblastoma (GBM) possesses the most malignant phenotype. Despite the current standard therapy using an alkylating anticancer agent, temozolomide, most patients with GBM die within 2 years. Novel chemotherapeutic agents are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of GBM. One of the solutions, drug repositioning, which broadens the indications of existing drugs, has gained attention. Herein, we categorize candidate agents, which are newly identified as therapeutic drugs for malignant glioma into 10 classifications based on these original identifications. Some drugs are in clinical trials with hope. Additionally, the obstacles, which should be overcome in order to accomplish drug repositioning as an application for GBM and the future perspectives, have been discussed.


Hematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo F. Fernandez

AbstractIn younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), initial treatment has provided very good control of the disease. Induction therapy has used combination chemotherapy, with anthracycline and cytarabine as the foundation. Recent trials support dose intensification of anthracycline in induction. Intensive postremission therapy further contributes to improving survival. The addition of targeted therapy with gemtuzumab ozogamicin to standard therapy has not improved on these outcomes. Newer agents targeted to specific molecular abnormalities or survival mechanisms in the leukemic cell are being studied as future additions to the current standard therapy.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 42-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Du Bois ◽  
J. Pfisterer

The current standard of treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer has been established in light of the results from various clinical trials. After debulking surgery, a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is considered to be the best treatment option in terms of survival and quality of life. However, since most patients on this chemotherapy modality will experience relapse, several studies have explored, and continue to do so, various modifications and alternatives to standard therapy in order to attain improved efficacy. Various modifications of dose, schedule, or route of standard regimens have shown no benefit, apart from intraperitoneal therapy, which has produced mixed results and would benefit from a definitive trial. Studies of maintenance/consolidation therapy have been mainly negative, although a small number of trials have produced enough positive data to prompt two new studies powered to detect survival benefits. Various phase II trials have investigated “targeted therapies,” but until now no positive results have been recorded. Translational studies are needed to identify patients who will benefit from such specific treatment strategies. The current most evaluated modification of standard therapy is the addition of a third non–cross-resistant drug to carboplatin and paclitaxel. Data for the addition of anthracyclines have either been negative (epirubicin) or not yet analyzed (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), while evaluable data are shortly expected for the addition of topotecan. Data on the addition of gemcitabine are eagerly awaited from two phase III trials.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Hana Rac ◽  
Karine D. Bojikian ◽  
Jose Lucar ◽  
Katie E. Barber

Necrotizing fasciitis is a deep-seated subcutaneous tissue infection that is commonly associated with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS). Surgical debridement plus penicillin and clindamycin are the current standard of care. We report a case of necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal TSS where linezolid was added after a failure to improve with standard therapy. Briefly after isolation of Streptococcus pyogenes from tissue cultures, the patient underwent two surgical debridement procedures and was changed to standard of care therapy. While the patient was hemodynamically stable, the patient’s wounds, leukocytosis, and thrombocytopenia all progressively worsened. After initiation of linezolid, the patient slowly improved clinically. The present report is the first to highlight the role of linezolid in streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis and TSS not improving with standard therapy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4110-4110 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Pelzer ◽  
A. Hilbig ◽  
J. Stieler ◽  
L. Roll ◽  
M. Stauch ◽  
...  

4110 Background: Approximately 20% of patients (pts) diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) develop venous thromboembolism, which may contribute to the dismal prognosis of PA. A small phase II trial suggested an improved survival by the addition of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to chemotherapy (Icli et al., ASCO 2003). We conducted a small pilot study which indicated that the addition of enoxaparin to chemotherapy GFFC chemotherapy (see below) is safe and feasible in pts with advanced PA. Furthermore, results of several phase III studies suggest that pts in good performance status may benefit from more intensive chemotherapy regimen (Riess et al; Heinemann et al; ASCO 2005). Based on these considerations we started the multicenter phase III study CONKO 004. Methods: 540 patients are to be recruited into this study. Primary stratification takes place according to Karnowsky performance status and kidney function. Patients with KPS > 80% and normal kidney function receive GFFC ± LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w ± Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.). Pts with KPS < 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) ± LMWM ± Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c. After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) ± Enoxaparin 40mg daily s.c. Results: From April 2004 to Dezember 2005 140 pts have been recruited in this study. Until now no unexpected serious adverse events concerning severe bleedings were observed in the enoxaparin treatment group. No heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT II) was documented. The first interim analysis per protocol is planned after 12 pts. with deep vein thrombosis or thromboembolic events. This interim analysis is expected to be completed in May 2006. Conclusions: Our observations indicate that the addition of enoxaparin—given the dosage mentioned above—to GEM/GFFC is safe, does not change toxicity and maintains activity of chemotherapy in pts with advanced PA. This study is open to recruitment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document