scholarly journals Reduction of in-hospital cardiac arrest with sequential deployment of rapid response team and medical emergency team to the emergency department and acute care wards

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0241816
Author(s):  
Babith Mankidy ◽  
Christopher Howard ◽  
Christopher K. Morgan ◽  
Kartik A. Valluri ◽  
Bria Giacomino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Rapid Response Team ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Arrest Rates ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Response Team

Purpose This study aimed to determine if sequential deployment of a nurse-led Rapid Response Team (RRT) and an intensivist-led Medical Emergency Team (MET) for critically ill patients in the Emergency Department (ED) and acute care wards improved hospital-wide cardiac arrest rates. Methods In this single-center, retrospective observational cohort study, we compared the cardiac arrest rates per 1000 patient-days during two time periods. Our hospital instituted a nurse-led RRT in 2012 and added an intensivist-led MET in 2014. We compared the cardiac arrest rates during the nurse-led RRT period and the combined RRT-MET period. With the sequential approach, nurse-led RRT evaluated and managed rapid response calls in acute care wards and if required escalated care and co-managed with an intensivist-led MET. We specifically compared the rates of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in the two periods. We also looked at the cardiac arrest rates in the ED as RRT-MET co-managed patients with the ED team. Results Hospital-wide cardiac arrests decreased from 2.2 events per 1000 patient-days in the nurse-led RRT period to 0.8 events per 1000 patient-days in the combined RRT and MET period (p-value = 0.001). Hospital-wide PEA arrests and shockable rhythms both decreased significantly. PEA rhythms significantly decreased in acute care wards and the ED. Conclusion Implementing an intensivist-led MET-RRT significantly decreased the overall cardiac arrest rate relative to the rate under a nurse-led RRT model. Additional MET capabilities and early initiation of advanced, time-sensitive therapies likely had the most impact.

Outcomes following changing from a two-tiered to a three-tiered hospital rapid response system

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
The Concord Medical Emergency Team Study Investigators
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rapid Response System ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Response System

Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine whether changing a hospital rapid response system (RRS) from a two-tiered to a three-tiered model can reduce disruption to normal hospital routines while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. Methods Staff at an Australian teaching hospital attending medical emergency team and cardiac arrest (MET/CA) calls were interviewed after the RRS was changed from a two-tiered to three-tiered model, and the results were compared with a study using the same methods conducted before the change. The main outcome measures were changes in: (1) the incident rate resulting from staff leaving normal duties to attend MET/CA calls; (2) the cardiac arrest rate, (3) unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates; and (4) hospital mortality. Results We completed 1337 structured interviews (overall response rate 65.2%). The rate of incidents occurring as a result of staff leaving normal duties to attend MET/CA calls fell from 213.7 to 161.3 incidents per 1000 MET/CA call participant attendances (P<0.001), but the rate of cardiac arrest and unplanned ICU admissions did not change significantly. Hospital mortality was confounded by the opening of a new palliative care ward. Conclusion A three-tiered RRS may reduce disruption to normal hospital routines while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. What is known about the topic? RRS calls result in significant disruption to normal hospital routines because staff can be called away from normal duties to attend. The best staffing model for an RRS is currently unknown. What does this paper add? The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that changing a hospital RRS from a two-tiered to a three-tiered model can reduce the rate of incidents reported by staff caused by leaving normal duties to attend RRS calls while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. What are the implications for practitioners? Hospitals could potentially reduce disruption to normal hospital routines, without compromising patient care, by changing to a three-tiered RRS.

scholarly journals The association between abnormal vital sign groups and undesirable patient outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Marina Lee ◽  
David McD Taylor ◽  
Antony Ugoni
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Vital Sign ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Abnormal Vital Sign

Introduction: To determine the association between both abnormal individual vital signs and abnormal vital sign groups in the emergency department, and undesirable patient outcomes: hospital admission, medical emergency team calls and death. Method: We undertook a prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral emergency department (February–May 2015). Vital signs were collected prospectively in the emergency department and undesirable outcomes from the medical records. The primary outcomes were undesirable outcomes for individual vital signs (multivariate logistic regression) and vital sign groups (univariate analyses). Results: Data from 1438 patients were analysed. Admission was associated with tachycardia, tachypnoea, fever, ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission to the emergency department, ≥1 abnormal vital sign at any time in the emergency department, a persistently abnormal vital sign, and vital signs consistent with both sepsis (tachycardia/hypotension/abnormal temperature) and pneumonia (tachypnoea/fever) (p < 0.05). Medical emergency team calls were associated with tachycardia, tachypnoea, ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission (odds ratio: 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–3.8), ≥2 abnormal vital signs at any time (odds ratio: 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.2–4.7), and a persistently abnormal vital sign (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.6–4.6). Death was associated with Glasgow Coma Score ≤13 (odds ratio: 6.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.5–16.0), ≥1 abnormal vital sign on admission (odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.2–5.6), ≥2 abnormal vital signs at any time (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–29.5), a persistently abnormal vital sign (odds ratio: 4.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.0–9.0), and vital signs consistent with pneumonia (odds ratio: 5.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.9–14.8). Conclusion: Abnormal vital sign groups are generally superior to individual vital signs in predicting undesirable outcomes. They could inform best practice management, emergency department disposition, and communication with the patient and family.

scholarly journals A physician-led medical emergency team increases the rate of medical interventions: A multicenter study in Korea

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258221
Author(s):  
Su Yeon Lee ◽  
Jee Hwan Ahn ◽  
Byung Ju Kang ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Sang-Min Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Arterial Line ◽  
Screening System ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Line Insertion ◽  
Icu Transfer ◽  
Portable Ultrasonography

Background According to the rapid response system’s team composition, responding teams were named as rapid response team (RRT), medical emergency team (MET), and critical care outreach. A RRT is often a nurse-led team, whereas a MET is a physician-led team that mainly plays the role of an efferent limb. As few multicenter studies have focused on physician-led METs, we comprehensively analyzed cases for which physician-led METs were activated. Methods We retrospectively analyzed cases for which METs were activated. The study population consisted of subjects over 18 years of age who were admitted in the general ward from January 2016 to December 2017 in 9 tertiary teaching hospitals in Korea. The data on subjects’ characteristics, activation causes, activation methods, performed interventions, in-hospital mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer after MET activation were collected and analyzed. Results In this study, 12,767 cases were analyzed, excluding those without in-hospital mortality data. The subjects’ median age was 67 years, and 70.4% of them were admitted to the medical department. The most common cause of MET activation was respiratory distress (35.1%), followed by shock (11.8%), and the most common underlying disease was solid cancer (39%). In 7,561 subjects (59.2%), the MET was activated using the screening system. The commonly performed procedures were arterial line insertion (17.9%), intubation (13.3%), and portable ultrasonography (13.0%). Subsequently, 29.4% of the subjects were transferred to the ICU, and 27.2% died during hospitalization. Conclusions This physician-led MET cohort showed relatively high rates of intervention, including arterial line insertion and portable ultrasonography, and low ICU transfer rates. We presume that MET detects deteriorating patients earlier using a screening system and begins ICU-level management at the patient’s bedside without delay, eventually preventing the patient’s condition from worsening and transfer to the ICU.

scholarly journals Improving rapid response system performance in a Chinese Joint Commission International Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 2961-2969
Author(s):  
Minfei Yang ◽  
Lanlan Zhang ◽  
Yuwei Wang ◽  
Yue Zhan ◽  
Xiaofei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Joint Commission ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Rapid Response System ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Response System ◽  
Joint Commission International ◽  
The Impact

Objective To assess the impact of a regional rapid response system (RRS) implemented in a Chinese Joint Commission International Hospital on the timely treatment of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs). Methods Clinical SAEs, activation periods, reasons for RSS activation, and patient outcomes were assessed using SAE response sheets at admission to the hospital and over 31 months of follow-up. Results We found that 192 events were called by medical staff and 6 were called by auxiliary staff. Reasons for the 385 RRS activations included: unconsciousness (133; 34.5%), and airway obstruction and absent carotid pulse (49 each; 12.7%). The average arrival time of the medical emergency team was 2.4 ± 0.1 minutes. There were 123 (62.1%) RRS activations during daytime working hours (8:00–17:00); CPR was performed in 86 (43.4%) cases. Outcomes of RRS were: vital signs stabilized in 82 (41.4%) patients and 61 (30.8%) patients were transferred to ICU. Conclusion Our experience showed that the regional RRS has led to better integrated multidisciplinary cooperation and reduced time for treating patients with SAEs, resulting in success of the RRS.

The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team

Resuscitation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Hodgetts ◽  
Gary Kenward ◽  
Ioannis G. Vlachonikolis ◽  
Susan Payne ◽  
Nicolas Castle
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Activation Criteria

Addition of Acute Care Nurse Practitioners to Medical and Surgical Rapid Response Teams: A Pilot Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
April N. Kapu ◽  
Arthur P. Wheeler ◽  
Byron Lee
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Rapid Response Team ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Rapid Response ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Rapid Response Teams ◽  
Care Nurse ◽  
Response Team ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundVanderbilt University Hospital’s original rapid response team included a critical care charge nurse and a respiratory therapist. A frequently identified barrier to care was the time delay between arrival of the rapid response team and arrival of the primary health care team.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of adding an acute care nurse practitioner to the rapid response team.MethodsAcute care nurse practitioners were added to surgical and medical rapid response teams in January 2011 to diagnose and order treatments on rapid response calls.ResultsIn 2011, the new teams responded to 898 calls, averaging 31.8 minutes per call. The most frequent diagnoses were respiratory distress (18%), postoperative pain (13%), hypotension (12%), and tachyarrhythmia (10%). The teams facilitated 360 transfers to intensive care and provided 3056 diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Communication with the primary team was documented on 97% of the calls. Opportunities for process improvement were identified on 18% of the calls. After implementation, charge nurses were surveyed, with 96% expressing high satisfaction associated with enhanced service and quality.ConclusionsTeams led by nurse practitioners provide diagnostic expertise and treatment, facilitation of transfers, team communication, and education.

scholarly journals Outcome among patients suffering from in-hospital cardiac arrest

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 170-177
Author(s):  
Sladjana Trpkovic ◽  
Aleksandar Pavlovic ◽  
Vesna Bumbasirevic ◽  
Ana Sekulic ◽  
Biljana Milicic
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Medical Emergency Team ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Time Of Arrival ◽  
Technical Equipment ◽  
Emergency Team ◽  
Factors Associated

Introduction. In relation to pre-hospital treatment of patients with cardiac arrest (CA) in the field where resuscitation is often started by nonprofessionals, resuscitation in hospital is most commonly performed by well-trained personnel. Objective. The aim was to define the factors associated with an improved outcome among patients suffering from the inhospital CA (IHCA). Methods. The prospective study included a total of 100 patients in the Emergency Center over two-year period. The patterns by the Utstein-Style guidelines recorded the following: age, sex, reason for hospital admission, comorbidity, cause and origin of CA, continuous monitoring, time of arrival of the medical emergency team and time of delivery of the first defibrillation shock (DC). Results. Most patients (61%) had cardiac etiology. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 58% of patients. ROSC was more frequently achieved in younger patients (57.69?11.37), (p<0.05), non-surgical patients (76.1%), (p<0.01) and in patients who were in continuous monitoring (66.7%) (p<0.05). The outcome of CPR was significantly better in patients who received advanced life support (ALS) (76.6%) (p<0.01). Time until the delivery of the first DC shock was significantly shorter in patients who achieved ROSC (1.67?1.13 min), (p<0.01). A total of 5% of IHCA patients survived to hospital discharge. Conclusion. In our study, the outcome of CPR was better in patients who were younger and with non-surgical diseases, which are prognostic factors that we cannot control. Factors associated with better outcome of IHCA patients were: continuous monitoring, shorter time until the delivery of the first DC and ALS. This means that better education of medical staff, better organization and up-to-dated technical equipment are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document