Evaluation of the spatial variability of the elements in tree barks used as biomonitors of atmospheric pollution

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1A) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Ishimaru ◽  
Eliane Conceição dos Santos ◽  
Mitiko Saiki

Author(s):  
Yu. Tyutyunnik ◽  
O. Shabatura ◽  
O. Blum ◽  
J. Daunis-i-Estadella

The bryogeochemical indication of atmospheric pollution in the central part of northern Ukraine is based on the use of moss P.schreberi species. The sampling system provided an empirical reference the moss sample data to a particular physical and geographical zone, taking into account the distance from the source of atmospheric pollution. This approach allowed developing a gradation of natural and man-caused conditions for the accumulation of chemical elements in moss samples. The data on the content of chemical elements in the moss-indicator were analysed and checked for comprehensive geostatistics (factor analysis methods, mapping of spatial correlations of significant factors, centered triangular charts and composite biplot). Results made possible to form a mutual hyperspace of geochemical factors and signs for its subsequent interpretation.The leading factor of the bryogeochemical indication is air pollution by a large dust of natural terrigenous and man-caused origin. Second factor connected with a finely dispersed man-caused-condensation aerosols impact; the third factor is identified by the behavior of titanium and vanadium as the effect of heat and power (TPP, boiler room) on atmospheric emissions; the fourth factor is аn impact of biogenesis, which is determined by active role of trace elements – sulfur and phosphorus; the fifth factor is connected with biogenic migration of trace elements – boron, copper and cobalt. The sixth factor is weak, and probably due to the behavior of manganese and chromium, associated with Eh-pH parameters of atmospheric precipitation and hydrometeors. The regional geostatistical analysis of the bryogeochemical data shows that the factor of the terrigenous dust uplift within the studied territory exhibits a spatial variability due to differences in the granulometric composition of the Quaternary deposits, the degree of soil retention and plowing, and differences in surface wind speeds. Spatial heterogeneity is obvious due to aman-caused factor showing a distribution of the dispersion of the Fe-S-Pb and V-Cd-Pb clusters on bipolar charts. Instead, such a geochemical factor as "biogenesis" shows a low spatial variability. The bryogeochemical indication is a good method for the assessment and monitoring of atmospheric pollution of large and varied natural and man-causedarea as well as the proposed geostatistical mapping of the atmogeochemic field showing that it is efficient todivide the territories by type of pollution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatunde S. Olatunji ◽  
Oladele Osibanjo ◽  
Olalekan S. Fatoki ◽  
Bhekumusa J. Ximba ◽  
Beatrice O. Opeolu

2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.O. Odukoya ◽  
T.A. Arowolo ◽  
O. Bamgbose

1951 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 119-120
Author(s):  
Louis McCabe

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 2295-2313
Author(s):  
Yoko Higuchi ◽  
Yoshiyuki Ueda ◽  
Kazuhisa Shibata ◽  
Jun Saiki

1963 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Doll

The evidence that cigarette smoking and atmospheric pcllution are causes of lung cancer is largely statistical. The first evidence was indirect; that is, i1. was noticed that in many countries the incidence of lung cancer had increased and that the increase could be correlated with changes in the prevalence of cigarette smoking and of certain types of atmospheric pollution.Since then much direct evidence has been obtained. The relationship between cigarette smoking and lung cancer has been demonstrated retrospectively by comparing the smoking habits of patients with and without lung cancer and prospectively by observing the mortality from lung cancer in groups of persons of known smoking habits. Conclusions can be drawn from these studies only after careful examination of the results. In particular it is important in retrospective studies to test a) the reproducibility of the data, b) the representativeness of the data, and c) the comparability of the special series and their controls. The resul1.s of retrospective studies are all similar and all show a close relationship between cigarette smoking and the disease.The results have been confirmed by pro~pective studies which are lesF. open to bias. The results can be explained if cigarette smoking causes lung cancer or if both are related to some third common factor. Ancillary data (pathological changes in the bronchial mucosa, animal experiments, etc.) support the causal hypothesis.The evidence relating to atmospheric pollution is less definite and it is difficult to get direct evidence of a relationship in the individual. It is clear that pollution has little effect in the absence of smoking, but the mortality associated with a given amount of smoking is generally greater in large towns than in the countryside and among men who have emigrated from Britain than among men who have lived all their lives in less polluted countries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 629 ◽  
pp. 207-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Hamilton ◽  
K Evans ◽  
B Raymond ◽  
E Betty ◽  
MA Hindell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document