scholarly journals PCSK9 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: Experience of a Specialized Lipid Center

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 808-815
Author(s):  
A. V. Blokhina ◽  
A. I. Ershova ◽  
A. S. Limonova ◽  
O. V. Kopylova ◽  
A. N. Meshkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Lipid Clinic ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lipid Metabolism Disorders ◽  
Very High

Aim. To characterize patients receiving PCSK9 inhibitors, and assess the efficiency of their treatment in a specialized lipid center.Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who visited the Lipid clinic of the National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine (Moscow, Russia), receiving PCSK9 inhibitor and having lipid profile in dynamics, was carried out (n=77). Cardiovascular risk (CVR) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target levels were evaluated in accordance with the Russian guidelines for the diagnostics and correction of dyslipidemias 2020.Results. Of 77 patients taking PCSK9 inhibitors (44.2% males, the median of age 56 [47; 66] years), the majority (64.0%) had a probable or definite familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The proportion of other lipid metabolism disorders, pure hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia was 21% and 15%. More than half of the patients (68.8%) had a very high CVR, mainly due to the presence of coronary heart disease (84.9%). The proportion of patients receiving PCSK9 inhibitors as monotherapy was 7.8%, in combination with high-intensity statin therapy – 33.8%, as part of triple lipid-lowering therapy (high-intensity statin, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors) – 50.6%. Addition of PCSK9 inhibitors to combined lipid-lowering therapy enabled to reduce the LDL-C level to 1.02 [0.62; 1.39] mmol/l with its total decrease from the baseline by 87.3%. While taking PCSK9 inhibitors, LDL-C <1.8 mmol/l and <1.4 mmol/l achieved at 78.3% and 57.7% FH patients with high and very high CVR, respectively. Among patients with other hyperlipidemias, 74.1% of patients with very high CVR was achieved the target LDL-C level <1.4 mmol/l.Conclusion: In a specialized lipid center, PCSK9 inhibitors are prescribed to patients with high or very high CVR, most of whom are FH patients. The effectiveness of the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in real-world practice is comparable to the results of clinical trials.

scholarly journals Application of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines to nationwide data of patients with a recent myocardial infarction: a simulation study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (40) ◽  
pp. 3900-3909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Allahyari ◽  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
Emil Hagström ◽  
Margrét Leosdottir ◽  
Pia Lundman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Monte Carlo Model ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Recent Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Lowering Therapy

Abstract Aims To estimate the proportion of patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) who would be eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, and to simulate the effects of expanded lipid-lowering therapy on attainment of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target as recommended by the guidelines. Methods and results Using the nationwide SWEDEHEART register, we included 25 466 patients who had attended a follow-up visit 6–10 weeks after an MI event, 2013–17. While most patients (86.6%) were receiving high-intensity statins, 82.9% of the patients would be eligible for expanded lipid-lowering therapy, as they had not attained the target of an LDL-C level of &lt;1.4 mmol and a ≥50% LDL-C level reduction. When maximized use of high-intensity statins followed by add-on therapy with ezetimibe was simulated using a Monte Carlo model, the LDL-C target was reached in 19.9% using high-intensity statin monotherapy and in another 28.5% with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, while 50.7% would still be eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. When use of alirocumab or evolocumab was simulated in those who were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, around 90% of all patients attained the LDL-C target. Conclusion  Our study suggests that, even with maximized use of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, around half of patients with MI would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Considering the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, the financial implications of the new guidelines may be substantial.

scholarly journals Inclisirán as an alternative treatment for Hypercholesterolemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-521
Author(s):  
Jorge Andrés Ojeda Villota ◽  
Javier Alfredo Pérez Martínez ◽  
Luis Alberto Burgos de Moya ◽  
Rodrigo Alfonso Chavez Vega ◽  
Roxana Rivera Valencia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Pcsk9 Inhibitors ◽  
Cholesterol Levels ◽  
Lowering Therapy

Hypercholesterolemia (CH) is defined as the elevation of serum cholesterol levels, especially low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which is considered to be one of the most relevant risk factors for triggering cardiovascular disease, for This is vitally important to start treatment, there are several highly useful pharmacological groups for lipid-lowering therapy, among them we highlight the PCSK9 inhibitors, among the molecules that are part of this group we find inclisirán, this being a structure that promises a lot in regarding the management of hypercholesterolemia.

scholarly journals Control of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease in Real-Life Practice: The DAUSSET Study in French Cardiologists

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5938
Author(s):  
Jean Ferrières ◽  
François Roubille ◽  
Michel Farnier ◽  
Patrick Jourdain ◽  
Denis Angoulvant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cholesterol Goal ◽  
Very High

Introduction: Patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) are at very high risk for cardiovascular events. Methods: The DAUSSET study is a national, multicenter, non-interventional study that included very high-risk CAD patients followed by French cardiologists. It aimed to describe real-life clinical practices for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control in the secondary prevention of CAD. Results: A total of 912 patients (mean age, 65.4 years; men, 76.1%; myocardial infarction, 69.4%; first episode, 80.1%) were analyzed. The LDL cholesterol goal was 70 mg/dL in most cases (84.9%). The LDL cholesterol goal <70 mg/dL was achieved in 41.7% of patients. Of the 894 (98.0%) patients who received lipid-lowering therapy, 81.2% had been treated more intensively after the cardiac event, 27.0% had been treated less intensively and 13.1% had been maintained. Participating cardiologists were very satisfied or satisfied with treatment response in 72.6% of patients. Moderate satisfaction or dissatisfaction with lipid-lowering therapy was related to not achieving objectives (100%), treatment inefficacy (53.7%), treatment intolerance (23.4%) and poor adherence (12.3%). Conclusion: These real-world results show that lipid control in very high-risk patients remains insufficient. More than half of the patients did not achieve the LDL cholesterol goal. Prevention of cardiovascular events in these very high-risk patients could be further improved by better education and more intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

scholarly journals Features of clinical and anamnestic characteristics and treatment of patients with hypertriglyceridemia (the data from Kuzbass register of dyslipidemias)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-78
Author(s):  
D. Yu. Sedykh ◽  
O. N. Hryachkova ◽  
V. V. Kashtalap ◽  
O. L. Barbarash
Keyword(s):  
Medical History ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Control Center ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lipid Metabolism Disorders ◽  
Lipid Control

Aim. To study the features of clinical and anamnestic characteristics and treatment of patients with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) using the data of the lipid control center of Kemerovo.Methods. The single-center retrospective study is based on the data of patients dynamic observation (n = 100) in the Dyslipidemia Registry of Kuzbass in 2019. A comparative analysis of clinical and anamnestic characteristics, lipidogram parameters and therapy was performed at the time when the patients were included in the study and after 6–12 months in patients with HTG (the criterion was the level of triglycerides (TG) above 1.69 mmol/L) and in patients without it. Indications for consulting a lipidologist were high cholesterol (levels of total cholesterol (TC) ˃7.5 mmol/L or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ˃4.9 mmol/L or TG˃5 mmol/L), requirement of the high dose and/or combination therapy of lipid-lowering drugs; medical history of cardiovascular diseases and/or revascularization of vascular bed in patients under 55 years of age; suspected intolerance to lipid-lowering therapy due to the developed side effects; the issue of lipid-lowering therapy in complex clinical situations.Results. Among the patients who visited a lipidologist in 2019, mixed hypertriglyceridemia was noted in 56 (56%) of cases, while 44 (44%) patients had other lipid metabolism disorders without increased levels of TG. A distinctive feature of patients with mixed hypertriglyceridemia is the lower incidence of myocardial infarctions (p = 0.029) and lower number of coronary stents (p = 0.018) in the medical history, despite the initially higher levels of TC (p = 0.005) and TG (p = 0.000). According to the results of 6–12 months observation, a significant decrease in TC (p = 0.001) and TG (p = 0.044) levels during the lipid-lowering therapy was revealed due to the addition of fenofibrate (p = 0.000) to all groups of patients who were monitored by a lipidologist.Conclusion. The patients with dyslipidemia and HTG are a complex category of patients who require combined lipid-lowering therapy, which can only be prescribed by a lipidologist. 

scholarly journals Escalation of liPid-lOwering therapy in patientS wiTh vascular disease receiving HIGH-intensity statins: the retrospective POST-HIGH study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaehyung Ha ◽  
Bom Lee ◽  
Jung Mi Park ◽  
Moonjong Kang ◽  
Jaewon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Clinical Benefits

AbstractIn this retrospective study, we investigated whether lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) escalation has clinical benefits in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of 55–99 mg/dL (1.4–2.6 mmol/L), post high-intensity. Out of 6317 Korean patients screened in 2005–2018, 1159 individuals with ASCVD and LDL-C levels of 55–99 mg/dL after statin use equivalent to 40 mg atorvastatin were included. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 492 patients (164 with LLT escalation, 328 controls without LLT escalation) were finally analysed. Primary outcome variables were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause death. At median follow-up (1.93 years), the escalation group had a lower MACCE rate (1.72 vs. 3.38 events/100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.83; p = 0.018) than the control group. The incidence of all-cause death (0.86 vs. 1.02 events/100 person-years; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.15–2.19; p = 0.42) and each MACCE component did not differ between groups. Kaplan–Meier curves exhibited lower risk of MACCE in the escalation group (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.12–0.97; p = 0.040) but a difference not statistically significant in all-cause death (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.48; p = 0.26). LLT escalation was associated with reduced cardiovascular risk, supporting more aggressive LLT in this population.

scholarly journals U-Shaped Relationship of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol With Risk of Severe COVID-19 From a Multicenter Pooled Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Gong ◽  
Yaqiong Chen ◽  
Yusheng Jie ◽  
Mingkai Tan ◽  
Zhaofang Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Odds Ratios ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Severe Group

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-known risk factor for coronary heart disease but protects against infection and sepsis. We aimed to disclose the exact association between LDL-C and severe 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Baseline data were retrospectively collected for 601 non-severe COVID-19 patients from two centers in Guangzhou and one center in Shenzhen, and patients on admission were medically observed for at least 15 days to determine the final outcome, including the non-severe group (n = 460) and the severe group (severe and critical cases) (n = 141). Among 601 cases, 76 (12.65%) received lipid-lowering therapy; the proportion of patients taking lipid-lowering drugs in the severe group was higher than that in the non-severe group (22.7 vs. 9.6%). We found a U-shaped association between LDL-C level and risk of severe COVID-19 using restricted cubic splines. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, odds ratios for severe COVID-19 for patients with LDL-C ≤1.6 mmol/L (61.9 mg/dL) and above 3.4 mmol/L (131.4 mg/dL) were 2.29 (95% confidence interval 1.12–4.68; p = 0.023) and 2.02 (1.04–3.94; p = 0.039), respectively, compared to those with LDL-C of 2.81–3.40 mmol/L (108.6–131.4 mg/dL); following multifactorial adjustment, odds ratios were 2.61 (1.07–6.37; p = 0.035) and 2.36 (1.09–5.14; p = 0.030). Similar results were yielded using 0.3 and 0.5 mmol/L categories of LDL-C and sensitivity analyses. Both low and high LDL-C levels were significantly associated with higher risk of severe COVID-19. Although our findings do not necessarily imply causality, they suggest that clinicians should pay more attention to lipid-lowering therapy in COVID-19 patients to improve clinical prognosis.

scholarly journals GENetic characteristics and REsponse to lipid-lowering therapy in familial hypercholesterolemia: GENRE-FH study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoeun Kim ◽  
Chan Joo Lee ◽  
Hayeon Pak ◽  
Doo-Il Kim ◽  
Moo-Yong Rhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Genetic Characteristics ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Primary Variable

Abstract Among the 146 patients enrolled in the Korean FH registry, 83 patients who had undergone appropriate LLT escalation and were followed-up for ≥ 6 months were analyzed for pathogenic variants (PVs). The achieved percentage of expected low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction (primary variable) and achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL were assessed. The correlations between the treatment response and the characteristics of PVs, and the weighted 4 SNP-based score were evaluated. The primary variables were significantly lower in the PV-positive patients than in the PV-negative patients (p = 0.007). However, the type of PV did not significantly correlate with the primary variable. The achievement rates of LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was very low, regardless of the PV characteristics. Patients with a higher 4-SNP score showed a lower primary variable (R2 = 0.045, p = 0.048). Among evolocumab users, PV-negative patients or those with only defective PVs revealed higher primary variable, whereas patients with at least one null PV showed lower primary variables. The adjusted response of patients with FH to LLT showed significant associations with PV positivity and 4-SNP score. These results may be helpful in managing FH patients with diverse genetic backgrounds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document