PHPN: Drug Interactions of Current Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Therapies in Abdominal Organ Transplant Recipients

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-95
Author(s):  
Mary Barrett ◽  
Patricia A. Uber
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 594-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Cron ◽  
Dawn M. Coleman ◽  
Kyle H. Sheetz ◽  
Michael J. Englesbe ◽  
Seth A. Waits

Author(s):  
J Arrojo Suárez ◽  
A Manzaneque ◽  
N Corominas Garcia ◽  
M Tuset Creus ◽  
JA Barberà Mir

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 932-943
Author(s):  
David Christiansen ◽  
Sandra Porter ◽  
Lindsay Hurlburt ◽  
Andrea Weiss ◽  
John Granton ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghofrani Hossein-Ardeschir ◽  
Ralph Schermuly ◽  
Norbert Weissmann ◽  
Robert Voswinckel ◽  
Henning Gall ◽  
...  

Medical intervention is necessary in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in order to prevent chronic disease progression and clinical deterioration. Recent years have seen the development of new disease-specific drugs, such as endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). However, there remains the potential for drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which can adversely affect drug metabolism and therefore treatment efficacy, an especially significant factor to consider in light of the increasing use of combination therapy in PAH and the ageing patient population who may also suffer age-related diseases requiring concomitant drug therapy. The ERA ambrisentan has demonstrated lower liver toxicity and fewer DDIs than other ERAs. The lack of any significant drug interactions with commonly used adjunct therapies such as warfarin or sildenafil could potentially improve treatment efficacy as well as patient safety.


2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani ◽  
Ralph Schermuly ◽  
Norbert Weissmann ◽  
Robert Voswinckel ◽  
Henning Gall ◽  
...  


2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 414-433
Author(s):  
Curtis D. Holt ◽  
Gordon Ingle ◽  
Theodore M. Sievers

Before the early 1980s, patient and allograft survival for solid organ transplant recipients was dismal. By 1983, the first calcineurin blocker, cyclosporine (Sandimmun), had been introduced, and outcomes were dramatically improved. However, cyclosporine macroemulsion had suboptimal pharmacokinetics, significant drug interactions, and several adverse effects, including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Recent advances with cyclosporine include the introduction of modified dosage formulations: Neoral, a microemulsion, and several generic microemulsion products. The potent second-generation calcineurin blocker tacrolimus (Prograf) was introduced in 1994 and has become the drug of choice for several types of transplant recipients. Although tacrolimus has improved pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drugmonitoring parameters, it has adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and diabetes. Thus, current immunosuppressive regimens implementing calcineurin blockers often involve additional immunosuppressive agents to “spare” the use of these agents, minimizing their adverse effects. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug interactions, adverse effects, and dosing of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document