scholarly journals Keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving dalam pembelajaran kalkulus II

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Markus Palobo
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One ◽  
Approach Problem

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving serta membandingkan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dengan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non equivalent comparison group design. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Musamus Merauke. Sampel penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika semester II yang dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving menggunakan uji one sample t-test dan untuk mengetahui pendekatan mana yang lebih efektif menggunakan uji independent sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari sikap terhadap Kalkulus dan prestasi belajar; (2) pendekatan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar; dan (3) pendekatan problem posing lebih efektif dari pada pendekatan problem solving ditinjau dari sikap mahasiswa terhadap Kalkulus.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, pendekatan problem solving, sikap terhadap kalkulus, prestasi belajar The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach in calculus II learning AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approach, and to compare the effectiveness between problem posing and problem solving approach in terms of attitude toward Calculus and learning achievement. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group design. The population of this study were student of Musamus University. The sample in this study were 2nd semester students of mathematics educations departement who were divided into two groups. To assess the effectiveness of the problem posing and problem solving approach, the one sample t-test was carried out and to determine the more effective approach, independent sample t-test was used. The results of this study show that (1) the problem posing approach was effective in terms of attitude towards Calculus and learning achievement; (2) problem solving approach was effective in terms of learning achievement; and (3) problem posing approach was more effective than problem solving approach in terms of students attitude toward calculus.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, attitude toward Calculus, leraning achievement

scholarly journals Komparasi pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevi Narendrati
Keyword(s):  
T Test ◽  
Vocational School ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
School Students ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Research Population ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Approach Problem

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika, dan menyelidiki manakah yang lebih efektif antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu, dengan rancangan pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. Dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas sebagai sampel penelitian. Untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing digunakan analisis one sample t-test pada aspek prestasi dan uji proporsi pada aspek minat. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan CTL dan problem posing, data dianalisis secara multivariat menggunakan uji T2 Hotelling. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat untuk menentukan variabel tertentu yang berkontribusi terhadap perbedaan secara keseluruhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika; (2) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK; (3) tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK.Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL, pendekatan problem posing, prestasi belajar, minat belajar matematika A Comparison of Statistics Learning Through CTL and Problem-Posing Approach in Terms of Learning Achievement and Interest in Learning Mathematics AbstractThis research aims to describe the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL approach and problem posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics and to investigate which approach is more effective in learning mathematics for Vocational School students. This research is a quasi-experimental research using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The research population comprised all year XI students of SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. From the population, two classes were randomly selected as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL and problem-posing approach, one sample t-test was used in the aspect of learning achievement and a proportion test on the aspect of interest in learning. The data were analyzed using the T2Hotelling’s test to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach and problem-posing approach. If differences in effectiveness were found, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results show that: (1) statistics learning through the CTL approach is effective in terms of learning achievement; (2) statistics learning through the problem-posing approach is effective in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics; (3) there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach and teaching using the problem-posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics among Vocational School students.Keywords: CTL approach, problem-posing approach, learning achievement, interest in learning mathematics 

Reducing Statistics Anxiety and Enhancing Statistics Learning Achievement: Effectiveness of a One-Minute Strategy

2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 297-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chei-Chang Chiou ◽  
Yu-Min Wang ◽  
Li-Tze Lee
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Applied Statistics ◽  
Statistics Anxiety ◽  
Instructional Tool ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Statistical Knowledge ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One

Statistical knowledge is widely used in academia; however, statistics teachers struggle with the issue of how to reduce students' statistics anxiety and enhance students' statistics learning. This study assesses the effectiveness of a “one-minute paper strategy” in reducing students' statistics-related anxiety and in improving students' statistics-related achievement. Participants were 77 undergraduates from two classes enrolled in applied statistics courses. An experiment was implemented according to a pretest/posttest comparison group design. The quasi-experimental design showed that the one-minute paper strategy significantly reduced students' statistics anxiety and improved students' statistics learning achievement. The strategy was a better instructional tool than the textbook exercise for reducing students' statistics anxiety and improving students' statistics achievement.

scholarly journals Dampak Komunikasi Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Sekolah Dasar

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viana Teti Anggraeni ◽  
Sutama Sutama ◽  
Samino Samino
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Communication Competence ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Scheffe Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The One

This study aims at know 1) in the contribution learning strategy for achievement; 2) contribution communication math for achievement; 4) the interaction learning strategy shown from the communication math for achievement. This was a quasi-experimental study employing the nonequivalent comparison-group design. This study involved two experimental groups. The sampel comprised Grade V students of SDN I Pengkok consisting of 2  classes to determine the class receiving the treatment of the cooperative learning model of the TGT  and the one receiving that of the TTW . The research instruments consisted of test and non-test instruments. The data were analyzed by theunivariate technique, namely the independent sample t-test  ata significance level of 5%. The data were analyzed  using the three way anova at a significance level of 5%. Follow up by a scheffe test fortwo-tailed test. The results of the study show that; 1) students who taught with TGT  get higher achievement; 2) the students who have high math communication competence have better achieve- ment; 4) the students who taught TGT type get higher achievement and the students have  high math communication competence get achievement

scholarly journals Problem Solving through Teamwork Using Puzzle Media for 10 years old Children in Dukuhwaluh Village

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Gisella Arnis Grafiyana ◽  
Intan Nur Rahmawati ◽  
Lutfi Septiana Widyastuti ◽  
Syavira Berliana Syaskia Dewi ◽  
Fanisa Dwi Oktaviana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Problem solving is a process that has been implemented in order to obtain a solution to a problem that is carried out in stages. Teamwork is the ability of individuals to work together with others and aims for members to be able to participate in the team and understand their duties. This study aims to determine the ability to solve problems and teamwork (teamwork) in children aged 10 years using puzzles. This research is an experimental study with a quasi-experimental design: non-equivalent control group design. The participants in this study were 8 children aged 10 years consisting of 5 boys and 3 girls. The data collection in this study was the acquisition of time in the preparation of puzzles. The data that has been obtained is then analyzed using the t-test (t-test). The results of this study indicate that the experimental group has faster problem solving than the control group because of the learning outcomes of teamwork.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PROBLEM POSING DAN PBL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR, DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risnawati Amiluddin ◽  
Sugiman Sugiman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Education Department ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning; dan untuk mengetahui mana yang lebih baik antara pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan problem-based learning ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan matematika Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin Baubau yang mengambil mata kuliah Kalkulus II. Instrumen penelitian meliputi tes prestasi belajar, dan angket motivasi. Analisis yang digunakan, yaitu uji one sample t-test, T2 Hotteling’s, dan uji independent sample t-test dengan data gain ternormalisasi. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) pendekatan problem posing dan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh positif terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa; (2) pendekatan problem posing tidak berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa sedangkan pendekatan PBL berpengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa; (3) pendekatan problem posing sama baiknya dengan pendekatan PBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar mahasiswa; dan (4) pendekatan PBL lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari motivasi belajar mahasiswa.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, problem-based learning, prestasi belajar, motivasi belajar mahasiswa. THE EFFECT PROBLEM POSING AND PBL ON LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT, AND LEARNING MOTIVATION STUDENTS MATHEMATICS EDUCATION AbstractThis study aims is to  describe the effect of problem posing and problem-based learning; and to knowing the better approach between problem posing approach and problem-based learning approach viewed from the learning achievement, and learning motivation of the students of mathematics Education Department of Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University of Baubau. This research was a quasi-experimental study with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. The population included all students of Mathematics Education Department who took Calculus II. The instrument used including an achievement test, and motivation questionnaire. The test was analyzed by One sample t-test, T2 Hottelling’s and independent sample t-test with gain data normalized each analysis was performed at the significance level of 0.05.The research found: (1) the problem posing approach and PBL approach positive effect the learning achievement; (2) PBL approach affect student’s learning motivation while the problem posing does not; (3) the problem posing approach is equal good to PBL approach in achieving the learning objective; and (4) the problem-based learning approach is better than the problem posing approach viewed from student’s learning motivation.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem-based learning, learning objective achievement, student’s learning motivation.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Jigsaw II dan GI terhadap pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah masalah pada kompetensi mendiagnosis permasalahan pengoperasian PC dan Peripheral ditinjau dari motivasi belajar

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pipit Utami ◽  
Pardjono Pardjono
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konsep dan pemecahan masalah pada materi KK3: (1) antara siswa yang diajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan siswa dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Group Investigation (GI) ketika motivasi belajar TKJ dikendalikan; dan (2) antara penggunaan tipe pembelajaran kooperatif (tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI) dengan tingkat motivasi belajar TKJ (tinggi dan rendah). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan nonequivalent comparison-group design menggunakan dua kelas perlakuan sebagai variabel bebas yang diberikan pembelajaran kooperatif dengan dua tipe berbeda. Satu kelas menggunakan tipe Jigsaw II, sedangkan kelas yang lainnya diberikan tipe GI. Variabel motivasi belajar TKJ dijadikan sebagai pembagi kategori kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah serta sebagai kovarian. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis multivarian kovariat dan desain faktorial dengan progam SPSS 16. Artikel ini menunjukkan tujuan kedua, dengan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) untuk pencapaian pemahaman konsep, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi dan rendah, akan tetapi untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI; dan (2) untuk pencapaian pemecahan masalah, pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw II dan tipe GI baik diaplikasikan untuk siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi, siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ rendah maupun siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar TKJ tinggi lebih baik menggunakan tipe GI. Kata  THE DIFFERENCES OF JIGSAW II AND GI ON THE CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING AND PROBLEM SOLVING IN COMPETENCE OF DIAGNOSING PROBLEMS WHEN OPERATE PC AND PERIPHERAL IN TERMS OF LEARNING MOTIVATIONAbstractThis research aims to describe the differences of concept understanding and problem solving on the KK3 material: (1) between students taught using the cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type when TKJ learning motivation was controlled; and (2) between the use of cooperative learning (Jigsaw Type II and Group Investigation (GI) Type) with the levels of TKJ learning motivation (high and low). This research was quasi-experimental with the nonequivalent comparison-group design using two treatment classes as independent variables which were given cooperative learning with two different types. One class used the Jigsaw Type II while the other used the GI Type. The TKJ learning motivation was used as the divider category of students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation as well as covariant. The data analysis technique in this research was the multivariat analysis of covariate and factorial design using the SPSS 16 program. This article shows the second aim, and the results shows that: (1) for concept understanding achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied for students who have high and low TKJ learning motivation, but for those who have low TKJ learning motivation, GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II; and (2) for problem solving achievement, cooperative learning Jigsaw Type II and GI Type are good to be applied to students who have high TKJ learning motivation, where for those who have high and low TKJ learning motivation GI Type is better than Jigsaw Type II.

scholarly journals The Effect Of Endurance Exercise On The Body's Defenses To Prevent Transmission Of The Covid Virus 19 For Student Penjaskesrek Undana

KINESTETIK ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-255
Author(s):  
Veramyta Maria Martha Flora Babang ◽  
Maria Andriani Barek Ladjar ◽  
Ronald Dwi Ardian Fufu
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Endurance Exercise ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Experimental Designs ◽  
Group Design ◽  
The World ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Exercise Endurance

Starting from the spread of viruses Covid 19 that swept across the world in particular in Indonesia, bringing the idea to create research that contribute in dealing with viruses Covid 19. This study aims to determine the effect of endurance exercise on the body's defenses to prevent transmission of the virus covid 19 for student penjaskesrek Undana. This research is an experimental study of Quasi-Experimental Designs by using Nonequivalent Comparison Group Design which compares the effect of endurance training on the two levels of physical fitness categories of Penjaskesrek students, those who have very Low and Low categories.Samples were 12 female students from Penjaskesrek Undana in semester 2, 4 and 6, where 6 people were in the less physical fitness category, and 6 in the physical fitness category were very Low.The findings of this study include; 1) In the group of physical fitness Low are Effect of Exercise Endurance Resilience Body face Virus Covid 19 on the students Penjaskesrek Undana significantly, 2) In the group of physical fitness is very Low are Effect of Exercise Endurance Resilience Body face Virus Covid 19 on the students Penjaskesrek Undana significantly.So, the conclusion is that endurance exercises are more effective in increasing endurance to deal with the Covid 19 virus.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Keefektifan Cornell Notes Method Dan Mind Maps Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-89
Author(s):  
Nurul Iman
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
T Test ◽  
Note Taking ◽  
Paired Sample ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Eighth Grade Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mind Maps

This study aims to examine the comparison of the effectiveness of note taking styles of students who use the cornell notes method and mind maps in terms of student self-efficacy. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study with a pretets-posttest nonequivalent comparison-group design. The population in this study were all eighth grade students of SMPN 1 Sungguminasa. The sample is class VIIIE and VIIIB as the experimental class. Class VIIIE is treated in the form of a note-taking style using cornell notes, while class VIIIB is treated as a note-taking style by mind maps. To test the effectiveness of learning using a paired sample t test. To test the difference in effectiveness using the independent sample t-test. The results of this study are: 1) the cornell notes method is not effective if viewed from the students' self efficacy, 2) mind maps is effective if it is reviewed by students' self-efficacy. 3) There is a difference in effectiveness between the cornell notes method and mind maps in terms of students' self-efficacy where students who record by mind maps get better efficacy scores than students who record by cornell notes method.

scholarly journals Keefektifan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi, metode, dan sikap matematis

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Ahmad Nasrullah ◽  
Marsigit Marsigit
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Mathematical Method ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
Problem Posing ◽  
School Students ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran problem posing dan  problem solving ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, dan sikap matematis siswa SMA. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain Nonequivalent (Pretest and Posttest) group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sakra Lombok Timur yang terdiri dari tujuh kelas. Dari tujuh kelas tersebut, dipilih secara acak dua kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagai berikut. 1). Pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving efektif ditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, dan sikap  matematis siswa SMA. 2). Ada perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan problem posing dan problem solving ditinjau dari ketiga variabel dependen secara simultan. 3). Pendekatan problem solving lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan pendekatan  problem posingditinjau dari ketercapaian kompetensi dasar dan kemampuan metode matematis. 4). Tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan kedua pendekatan pembelajaran ditinjau dari sikap  matematis siswa SMA.Kata Kunci: pendekatan problem posing, problem solving, ketercapaian kompetensi dasar, metode matematis, sikap matematis siswa. The effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving in terms of basic competence attainment, mathematical method, and mathematical attitude AbstractThis study aims to describe and compare the effectiveness of problem posing and problem solving approaches in terms of mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method, and mathematical attitude of senior high school students. This study was a quasi-experimental study using the nonequivalent pretest and posttest group design. The population was the  X grade students of State Senior High School 1 of Sakra Lombok Timur that consisted of seven classes. The sample was two classes selected randomly from all Year X classes. The results of the study are as follows. 1) Problem posing and problem solving approaches are effective in terms of the mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method and mathematical attitude of Senior Hogh School students. 2) There is a different effect of problem posing and problem solving approaches on all dependent variables simultaneously. 3) Problem solving approach is more effective than problem posing in terms of the basic competence attainment and mathematical method. 4) There is no different effect of problem posing and problem solving approaches in terms of student mathematical attitude.Keywords: problem posing approach, problem solving approach, mathematics basic competence attainment, mathematical method, mathematical attitude.

scholarly journals Classification-Card Media: Its Effect towards Learning Achievement in Biology Subject

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Lia Angela ◽  
Mitra Noveri ◽  
Tiara Tiara
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Final Test ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Improve Student Learning ◽  
Test Result

This research aims to determine the effect of the application of classification card media to the learning achievement. This research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of this research is the students of class X Science of SMA Negeri 7 Kerinci. The sample class is students of Class X Science 1 as an experimental class and Class X Science 2 as a control class. The research instrument is a test with objective questions. The final test result data were analyzed using t-test. The results of the t-test analysis showed that the application of the classification card media could improve student learning achievement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document