scholarly journals EFFECT OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TRAINING AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS ON SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE CLASS X

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Envilwan Harefa ◽  
Motlan Sirait ◽  
Eva M. Ginting

The aims of research were to analize: (1) Student’s skill proccess science by using inquiry training learning model better than direct intruction learning model; (2) Student’s skill process science who had under average better than above average category in scientific knowledge; and (3) the interaction between learning model and the level of scientific knowledge in fluencing student’s skill process science. The research was quasi-experimental research. The population of this research is all of thenth grade students of SMAN 3 Gunungsitoli. The sample of this researchconsist of grade with was taken by cluster random sampling were X2 and X3 class.The research instrument consisted of skill process science essay test and criticalthinking skills test data be analysed by using Two–way ANAVA. Result of theresearch showed that kill of the student science process (1) between inquiry training and direct intruction, where inquiry training better than direct intruction, (2) between group of student in the group of the students scientific knowledgeupon and under of mean, where scientific knowledge upon of mean better then scientific knowledge under of mean, (3) no interaction between inquiry training and scientific knowledge increased skill of student science process.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bedilius Gunur ◽  
Apolonia Hendrice Ramda ◽  
Alberta Parinters Makur

<p>This research aimed to: 1) compare the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who were taught with the Problem Based Learning model assisted by open-ended problems and students who were traditionally taught, 2) investigate the interaction between problem based learning models with mathematical attitudes towards students' mathematical critical thinking abilities. It was a quantitative study using a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design and was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Cibal, Manggarai district, East Nusa Tenggara. Two classes were experimental and two classes were control and were chosen using cluster random sampling techniques. Data were obtained through questions to measure mathematical critical thinking skills and mathematical attitude questions and then analyzed with two way ANOVA. The data analysis and interpretation showed that 1) the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who were taught with the Problem Based Learning model assisted by open-ended problems were better than those of students who have been traditionally taught 2) there was no interaction between the problem based learning model and students' mathematical critical thinking abilities. This means that both students who had high and low mathematical attitudes scores when taught with the Problem Based Learning approach assisted with open-ended problems were always better than students who are taught with conventional approaches.</p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT:</strong> Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; 1) membandingkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa yang mengikuti model <em>problem</em><em> </em><em>based learning</em> berbantuan masalah open-ended dengan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran konvensional. 2) melihat interaksi antara model problem based learning dengan sikap matematis terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (<em>quasi experiment</em>) dengan rancangan factorial 2 x 2. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Cibal kabupaten Manggarai, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling, 2 kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 2 kelas sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan berupa tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika dan tes sikap matematis. Data yang telah terkumpul dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji Anava Dua Jalur. Sebelum digunakan uji anava dua jalur, data tersebut terlebih dahulu dilakukan uji normalitas dan homogenitas. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan; 1) kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran matematika dengan model Problem Based Learning berbantuan masalah open-ended lebih baik daripada siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan konvensional; 2) tidak terdapat interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dengan sikap matematis siswa terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa. Artinya baik siswa yang memiliki sikap matematis tinggi maupun yang memiliki sikap matematis rendah apabila diajarkan dengan pendekatan pembelajaran Problem Based Learning berbantuan masalah open-ended selalu lebih baik dibanding siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan pendekatan konvensional.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Gendhis Cikal Mayang ◽  
Agus Efendi ◽  
Nurcahya Pradana Taufik Prakisya

<span>This research aims to determine the differences in students’ critical thinking skills between the class that applies problem-based learning model through Edpuzzle and the class that applies expository learning model. The method used is quantitative quasi-experimental design using pre-test and post-test control. The sample of this research was participated by 66 students. They were selected by applying the technique of cluster random sampling. The data was obtained from the result of pre-test and post-test based on the indicator of critical thinking skills. The result showed that there were differences and an increase in the critical thinking skills of students who applied the problem-based learning learning model assisted by edpuzzle compared to the expository model  It is proven by the result of the 1<sup>st</sup> hypothesis test through t-test which the post-test result shows the score of 0,014, which means the score is less than the error level of 0,05. Therefore, it can be concluded that both of the classes have significant differences (H<sub>0</sub> is rejected). On the other, the 2<sup>nd</sup> hypothesis test that used the gain test indicates the score of 0,41 for the experimental class and the score of 0,28 for the control class, which means there is a significant increases in the critical thinking skills of both classes.</span>


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-270
Author(s):  
Ririn Febriana ◽  
Mukarramah Mustari

Abstract:This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning model Think Thalk Write on the ability of critical thinking among students of class X SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung. Research by the author is Quasi Experiment study. The study involved two groups of learners who totaled 31 students to a class experiment and 30 learners to grade control. The collection of data obtained using a test instrument. Shaped test instrument shaped essay test critical thinking skills. The results show that there are significant research critical thinking skills of learners after using cooperative learning model Think Talk Write. T test obtained tcoll > t table is 2.930 > 2.00 with a significance level of 5%. So H1 received, which indicates that there are significant cooperative learning model Think Talk Write mode on the ability of critical thinking among students of Class X. Abstrak:Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh  model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Thalk Write terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis pada peserta didik kelas X SMK SMTI Bandar Lampung. Penelitian yang penulis lakukan merupakan penelitian Quasi Eksperimen. Penelitian ini melibatkan 2 kelompok belajar peserta didik yang berjumlah 31 peserta didik untuk kelas Eksperimen  dan 30 peserta didik untuk kelas kontrol. Pengumpulan data diperoleh dengan menggunakan instrument tes. Instrument tes berbentuk essay berbentuk test kemampuan berpikir kritis. Diperoleh hasil penelitian bahwa terdapat pengaruh kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Talk Write. Uji t diperoleh t hitung > ttabel yaitu 2,930 > 2,00 dengan taraf signifikan 5%. Jadi H1 diterima, yang menandakan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis pada peserta didik Kelas X . 


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ferawati Hutapea ◽  
Motlan .

The purpose of research are 1). To know are differences in science process skills of students with the applied of inquiry training learning model and direct instruction learning models, 2). To know are differences in science process skills of students who has high critical thinking ability and the  critically low ability, 3). To know the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward students science process skills. The samples in this research conducted by cluster random sampling and  as many as two class , the first class (X-I) as experiment applied Inquiry Training learning model and the second class (X-2) as control class applied Direct Intruction learning model. The instrument used in this research is tests science process skills and critical thinking skills in the form of description and observation sheets science process skills. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) there are differences in students science process skills with applied inquiry training model and direct intruction model, 2) science process skills of students with high critical thinking ability is better than the science process skills of students with the ability to think critically low, and 3) the interaction inquiry training learning model and critical thinking ability toward the science process skills.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purnama Silitonga ◽  
Mara Bangun Harahap ◽  
Derlina .

This study aims: 1) to determine differences in science process skills of students with learning model inquiry training and conventional learning models, 2) to determine the difference science process skills of students who have high creativity and creativity is low, 3) to determine the interaction model of learning inquiry trainingwith creativity of the science process skills. The sampling technique conducted cluster random sampling two classes, where first class as a class experiment with the number of students 32 people applied learning model inquiry training (X-1) and the second class as a class control the number of students 32 people who applied conventional learning model ( X-2). Instruments in this study is the science process skills test and a test of creativity in the form of a description. From these results it can be concluded that: 1) science process skills of students that learned with a learning model inquiry training is better than the students that learned with conventional learning models, 2)science process skills of students with high creativity better than students with creativity is low, 3) there is interaction between inquirylearning model training and creativity in influencing the science process skills of students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Ade Susanti

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Sakilah Sakilah ◽  
Ardi Yulis ◽  
Nursalim Nursalim ◽  
Rian Vebrianto ◽  
Abu Anwar ◽  
...  

This study aims to study: the differences between students who take part in spending with a project-based learning model and students who follow learning with conventional models of student learning motivation. This study was a quasi-experimental study with nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were fifth grade students of Public Elementary School 167 Pekanbaru in 2018/2019. Data collection using tests to determine critical thinking skills and questionnaires to learn learning motivation. Data analysis using t-test and Manova with a significance level of 5%. The results of this study indicate that there are differences between students who take part in spending with a project-based learning model with students who take learning with the conventional model on student learning motivation with the results of data calculations also understand Thitung at 17.412 and P = 0.00.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-224
Author(s):  
Titania Mega Rizti ◽  
Erlina Prihatnani

AbstrakPembelajaran matematika diharapkan dapat mengasah kemampuan berpikir kritis, meskipun pembelajaran secara daring. Penelitian bertujuan menerapkan salah satu model pembelajaran yang menekankan pada aspek berpikir kritis yaitu model 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningfull) pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar dan menganalisis dampaknya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh siswa SMPN di Salatiga, sampelnya 82 siswa dari SMPN 1 Salatiga dan SMPN 6 Salatiga yang dibagi menjadi kelompok eksperimen 1 dan 2. Desain penelitian eksperimen semu ini adalah randomized control grup pretest-postest design. Instrumen tes berbentuk 7 soal uraian, terdiri dari pretest dan posttest dengan rubrik penilaian berdasarkan aspek Focus, Reason, Inference, Situation, Clarity, and Overview. Uji hipotesis menunjukkan penerapan model pembelajaran 3CM dengan dua jenis kegiatan creative yang berbeda yaitu berbasis project dan berbasis problems posing menghasilkan kemampuan berpikir kritis yang sama. Penerapan 3CM dimungkinkan untuk menggunakan dua jenis kegiatan tersebut dalam melakukan aspek creative guna mengasah kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa.  The Effectiveness of The 3 CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) Learning Model on The Critical Thinking Ability of SMP StudentsAbstractMathematics learning is expected to hone thinking skills, although learning must be done boldly. This study aims to apply a learning model that emphasizes the critical thinking aspect, namely the 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) model on the flat-sided building material, and analyze its impact on students' critical thinking skills. The study population was all students of SMPN in Salatiga, the sample was 82 students from SMPN 1 Salatiga and SMPN 6 Salatiga who were divided into experimental 1 and 2 groups. This quasi-experimental research design was a randomized control group pretest-posttest design. The test instrument is in the form of a description of 7 questions consisting of a pretest and posttest with a rubric based on aspects Focus, Reason, Inference, Situation, Clarity, and Overview. Hypothesis testing that the application of the 3CM learning model with different types of Creative (based on project and problems posing) activities results in the same critical thinking skills.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Retno Triningsih ◽  
Mawardi Mawardi

The purpose of conducting this research is to compare the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning learning model and the Project Based Learning learning model in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary students. This type of research used in this research is Quasi Experimental with experimental design of Post test-Only Control Group Design. The population in the study were 164 five grade students in Diponegoro Salatiga Cluster, while the sample is 111 students of five grade students in SDN Mangunsari 01, SDN Mangunsari 03, and SDN Mangunsari 05. The results obtained from this study are based on descriptive statistics where the average implementation of the Problem Based Learning learning model is 92.46, while the average implementation of the Project Based Learning learning model is 85.15. the results of critical thinking skills in the Problem Based Learning model are higher than the Project Based Learning learning model reinforced by the T test results obtained by the Sig. (2-tailed) of 0, 047 0.05 thus there is a significant difference between the two groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
Madi Amin ◽  
Muliana Muliana ◽  
Rohantizani Rohantizani

The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who were taught using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model was better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who were taught through a scientific learning approach. This study uses a quantitative approach and the type of research used is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were 11th grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Simeulue Barat, the samples in this study were two classes selected using a nonprobability sampling technique of purposive sampling type, namely class 11 IPA-1 as an experimental class using the Auditory Intellectually Repetition model and class 11 IPA-2 as a control class using a scientific approach. The data processing technique uses SPSS version 25 with the results of the study showing that: the value of Sig (p-value) > 0.05), it is accepted that it is 0.629 in the experimental class and 0.273 in the control class so that the data has a normal distribution. The t-test analysis of students' mathematical critical thinking skills was obtained 0.001 < 0.05, then Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. This means that the mathematical critical thinking ability of students who are taught with the Auditory Intellectually Repetition learning model is better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who are taught with a scientific learning approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document