A Study on the Causes of Rating Disagreement among Credit Rating Agencies from the Perspective of Corporate Governance

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-104
Author(s):  
Yujin Kim ◽  
Jungin An
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 954-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Cash

Purpose The European Commission (EC) is currently examining methods to increase the effectiveness of corporate governance disclosures. This paper aims to examine whether the credit rating agencies (CRAs), both on account of their influence within the marketplace and also their methodological approach to rating Governance, may have a greater role to play in the EC achieving those particular objectives. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based upon a normative methodology, upon which the issue is contextualised and a proposal is put forward regarding a methodological alteration that can be instituted by the CRAs. Findings The paper finds that the CRAs may have a much greater role to play in meeting the objectives of the EC. Whilst the EC is focusing upon regulatory monitoring, the paper finds that there is a potential for a more efficient model within which the CRAs adapt their methodologies to include corporate governance disclosure into their rating processes. Originality/value In presenting the idea that the comply or explain principles put forward by the EC are proving to be somewhat ineffective, the paper contributes to the field by suggesting there are private endeavours which may add a sense of impact to disclosure proceedings, rather than the purely public regime being envisioned.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Joon Chae ◽  
Kwang-Wook Oh

This study examined whether there were differences in the credit ratings of family firms, one type of business ownership and corporate governance in Korea. Credit rating agencies which evaluate a company's ability to pay back the debt play a key role in evaluating corporate values in the capital market. A variety of standards are applied to evaluate corporate credit ratings. The corporate governance structure is also under consideration. Credit rating agencies may give excellent credit ratings to family firms if they judge that family companies have efficient governance structures resulting in lower agency costs as companies which try to match minority shareholders' interests. On the other hand, they may give lower credit ratings to family firms if they judge that family firms have a negative impact on firm performance. In this context, this study planned to investigate how credit rating agencies constituting the mainstay in the evaluation of corporate values with analysts judged the roles of family firms which had been controversial in previous studies in the capital market, and present direct results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document