scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PBL MODEL WITH THE TPS REVIEWED FROM CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF GRADE 5 STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS TEACHING

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Elza Pristy Latifah ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Yohana Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Average Value

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in effectiveness of PBL learning models with TPS in terms of the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study, the Non-equivalent Control Group Design design is used to investigate the effects of the two variables used. In this study 19 students at Bacem Elementary School and 19 students at Waru Elementary School, Jepon District, Blora Regency. The two groups were given different treatments, namely the PBL learning model was treated in the experimental group at Bacem SDN, and the TPS model was treated in the control group at Waru Elementary School. Based on the results of the study, H_oditotak and H_a were accepted. The analysis in this study used the Ngain test to determine the increase in the average value of the results of the pretest and posttest. This is based on the results of the NGain analysis showing an increase in value after being given PBL treatment of 0.64, while the increase in value after being given TPS treatment was 0.53. Based on all analysis results, it can be concluded that there are significant differences in effectiveness in this study. Evidently the application of PBL learning models has a higher level of effectiveness when compared to the TPS learning model of the critical thinking skills of fifth grade students in mathematics

scholarly journals Project and problem based learning on students' critical thinking skills at cell material

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139
Author(s):  
Isti Citra Wulandari ◽  
Nuri Dewi Muldayanti ◽  
Anandita Eka Setiadi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Cell Material

Based on observations when apprenticed at SMAN 7 Pontianak it was known that students' critical thinking skills are still low. Therefore, a variety of learning models are needed to improve students' critical thinking skills. The purpose of this research was to determine the differences and effective learning model in improving students' critical thinking skills between students taught using the project-based learning model and the problem based learning model. The research method used was a quasi-experiment with a nonequivalent control group design. The data collection techniques used were measurement. The results showed a significant value of the T-test was 0.000<0.05. This means that there are differences in students' critical thinking skills taught using the project-based learning model and problem-based learning. The average value of N-Gain in the project-based learning model was 0.69 (moderate) while the problem-based learning model was 0.58 (moderate), so the project-based learning model is more effective than the problem based learning model on students' critical thinking skills.Keywords: Critical thinking skills, problem-based learning, project-based learning, cell material

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Sebastianus Fedi ◽  
A S Gunsi ◽  
A H Ramda ◽  
B Gunur
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Research Hypothesis

<p>This research is aim to compare the students critical thinking skills who engaged in a problem-based learning model with students who engaged in conventional learning. This is experimental research, with posttest only control group design. The population is 50 of Accounting XI students in Widya Bhakti Vocational School in Ruteng, Flores. Samples grouping on nonprobability sampling, that is saturated sampling where all of this population members are used as samples. The sample in the experimental class was all 24 students of class XI Accounting 1 who received treatment problem-based learning, while the control class sample was all 26 students of class XI Accounting 2 who received conventional learning. Data is collected through tests in the form of description questions.</p>A prerequisite test was carried out before testing the research hypothesis: the normality test and the homogeneity test. The results of these prerequisite test are data in two groups indicated as normally distributed and both are homogeneous. Then, the research hypothesis was tested using t-test. Obtained and on a significance level of and degrees of freedom. Because then is rejected while is acceptable. In this case,  the average value of critical thinking skills in the experimental class,  the average value of critical thinking skills in the control class. The meaning of the results of this analysis are: (1) when compared to conventional learning models, the problem-based learning model has a more positive and significant influence on the formation of students' critical thinking skills; (2) The value of t-count = 4.005 indicates that the average value of critical thinking skills of students using problem-based learning models is so higher than the average value of conventional learning students' critical thinking abilities.

scholarly journals Getting critical thinking about ecosystem: How impact and responses of students about the CirGi learning model?

Biosfer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-100
Author(s):  
Lia Junita Harahap ◽  
Rizhal Hendi Ristanto ◽  
Ratna Komala
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Many Sources

The broad scope of biology and the many sources of biology reading requires eleven grade students to think critically about sorting out information to develop and support students' critical thinking skills. CirGi is an integration of the cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) learning model and guided inquiry (GI) that emphasizes reading and writing activities, accompanied by guidance from the teacher. This study aimed to analyze the influence of CirGi's learning model on students' critical thinking skills. This research uses a quasi-experiment method with pre-post control group design. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, namely 104 high school students. Data collection was carried out using instruments of critical thinking skills in the form of essays, questionnaire responses of students to learning, and observation sheets of syntax implementation. The data analysis technique used was one-way ANCOVA. After controlling for the pretest scores, the CirGi learning model's influence on students' critical thinking skills was influenced. This learning model was appropriate for learning biology, so it can regrow the activities of reading science books that impact students' critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals Enhancement of Mathematics Critical Thinking Skills through Problem Based Learning Assisted with Concrete Media

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Dyah Pramestika ◽  
I Gusti Agung Ayu Wulandari ◽  
I Wayan Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Class Iv

In learning mathematics, students are still found to have difficulty in understanding and developing critical thinking skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the significant influence of the Problem Based Learning model assisted by concrete media on the ability to think critically mathematics in grade IV in elementary school. This research was a quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design. The population of class IV SD as many as 293 people. The sample was determined by cluster random sampling technique. The sample in the experimental group was 32 students and the control group was 30 students. Data used as a test method in the form of a subjective test (description). The data obtained were analyzed using the t-test analysis technique with the polled variance formula. The results of data analysis were obtained (t-count = 4.021> t-table = 2,000) at the significance level of 5% (dk = 32 + 30 - 2 = 67) which means that there was a significant difference in the ability to think critically mathematics between groups being taught with the model of Problem Based Learning with media aids Concretely with the group learned using conventional learning models in class IV elementary school. It can be concluded that the Problem Based Learning model assisted by concrete media influences the ability to think critically mathematics in class IV. The results of this study can be used as input for teachers to choose various learning models in teaching.

scholarly journals MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SIKLUS BELAJAR DESKRIPTIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMK PADA MATERI IKATAN KIMIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Suhaeti Sri Mulyasih
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Chemical Bonding ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Average Value

The aim of this study was to get information about the effectiveness of using descriptive learning cycle instructional model to improve students’ understanding and critical thinking skills related to chemical bonding concept in one of vocational high schools (SMK) in Sumedang. Indicators for conceptual understanding consisted of six categories, while indicators of critical thinking skills were four indicators. The method used was quasi-experimental research design nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Instrument used was essay test. T test results showed that based on the average value of n-gain, difference in overall students' conceptual understanding in experimental class and control class was significant (p = 0.00 p <0.05), and critical thinking skills significantly  developed by descriptive learning model cycle was to identify conclusions (p = 0.004 p <0.05).Keywords: critical thinking skills, concepts of chemical bonding, descriptive learning model, understanding conceptsABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh informasi mengenai penggunaan model pembelajaran siklus belajar deskriptif dalam upaya meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan berpikir kritis siswa di salah satu SMK di Kabupaten Sumedang pada konsep ikatan kimia. Indikator pemahaman konsep yang diselidiki terdiri dari enam kategori, sedangkan indikator keterampilan berpikir kritis yang diselidiki berjumlah empat indikator. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa soal tes berbentuk esai. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan nilai rata-rata n-gain, perbedaan pemahaman konsep siswa antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol secara keseluruhan berbeda signifikan (p= 0,00  p< 0,05), dan keterampilan berpikir kritis yang paling dapat dikembangkan secara signifikan melalui model pembelajaran siklus belajar deskriptif adalah mengidentifikasi kesimpulan (p= 0,004 p< 0,05).Kata kunci: model pembelajaran deskriptif, pemahaman konsep, keterampilan berpikir kritis, konsep ikatan kimia

scholarly journals Improving Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill in Science through HOTS-based Science Questions: A Quasi-Experimental Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-386
Author(s):  
Y. Sidiq ◽  
N. Ishartono ◽  
A. Desstya ◽  
H. J. Prayitno ◽  
S. Anif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Elementary School Students ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
School Level ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental

There have been many efforts to improve elementary school students’ critical thinking skills in science through various learning methods. However, only a few research results show efforts to improve critical thinking skills through HOTS-based science questions for elementary school students. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of student habituation with HOTS-based science questions in improving elementary school students’ critical thinking skills in science. Quasi-experimental methods were employed in this research with a nonequivalent control group design involving a treatment class and a control class. The treatment class gets treatment in HOTS-based science questions habituation during the learning process, while the control class in conventional approaches. A total of 60 students is from one of the elementary schools in Surakarta, Indonesia. To take data related to students’ critical thinking skills, they were given pretest and posttest where each test used HOTS-based science questions in an essay. The obtained data from the tests were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. This study showed that the average of critical thinking skills in science of students in the experimental class was higher than the control class, with a positive mean difference of 0.4226. Based on these results, it is recommended that the results of this study can provide an overview to educational practitioners at the elementary school level and researchers in the field of science education related to efforts to improve elementary school students’ critical thinking skills in science through the habituation of HOTS-based science questions.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Penemuan terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Self Concept dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Peserta Didik Kelas VII SMP pada Materi Bangun Datar

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Widayati Widayati
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
School Students

Abstrak.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis penemuan terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan self concept dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal peserta didik SMP pada materi bangun datar pada tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan Posttest Only Control Group Design. Sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 96 orang peserta didik yang dipilih dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling dengan tiga kelas sampel. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh melalui pemberian tes kemampuan awal, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis, dan angket self concept yang telah divalidasi dan diuji reliabilitasnya. Data diolah menggunakan analisis kovarians (ANKOVA) dan dilanjutkan dengan Uji-t terkoreksi. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa 1) Ada perbedaan pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis penemuan terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan sel concept dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal peserta didik SMP kelas VII, 2) Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis peserta didik yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran discovery terbimbing lebih baik daripada kemampuan peserta didik yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing dan model pembelajaran konvensional, (2) Self Concept matematis peserta didik yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran discovery terbimbing lebih baik daripada kemampuan peserta didik yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry terbimbing dan model pembelajaran konvensional. Abstract.This study aimed to determine the effect of discovery-based learning models on junior high school students’ self-concept and mathematical critical thinking skills by controlling the initial ability on learning polygon. The research method used in this study was a quasi-experimental method with the design of Posttest Only Control Group Design. Ninety six students of grade VII selected by using cluster random sampling technique with three sample classes. The data in this study were obtained through the provision of initial ability tests, mathematical critical thinking skills tests, and self-concept questionnaires that had been validated and tested for reliability. Analysis of Covariance (ANACOVA) continued with corrected t-test were used to process the data. The results showed that 1) There were differences in the influence of discovery-based learning models on mathematical critical thinking skills and self-concept by controlling the initial ability of junior high school students of grade VII, 2) Students’ critical thinking ability who learnt using guided discovery learning models are better than the ability of students who learnt using guided inquiry learning model and conventional learning models, 3) Mathematical self-concept of students who learnt by using a guided discovery learning model are better than the ability of students who learnt by using a guided inquiry learning model and conventional learning models

scholarly journals Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Berbasis Saintifik Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Devi Afriyuni Yonanda
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Teachers And Students

This research is based on the problem of still low critical thinking skills of elementary school students. Students in the learning process are still required to memorize facts, concepts, and theories on the material they study. The purpose of this study is to improve students' critical thinking skills through a Scientific Based Inquiry models (IBS). The type of research used is Research and Development (R & D) or research and development. The research procedure used the Borg & Gall model. Product validation tests are carried out by a team of experts or material experts, linguists, and practitioners. Practicality test is carried out by using questionnaire responses of teachers and students after the learning process. Effectiveness testing on limited trials using experimental design pretest-posttest control group design. The results of this development study obtained product validity test obtained a score of 3.4 with the criteria of "very good". The practicality of the product in the learning process through the teacher's response and student responses obtained scores of 3.33 and 3.27 with the criteria of "very good". The effectiveness of the product through limited trials at Majalengka UPTD Elementary School through N-Gain analysis showed that students' critical thinking skills in the control class were 0.60 "medium" criteria and 0.96 "high" criteria in the experimental class. Based on the results of the research conducted it can be concluded that the development of the IBD model is valid, practical, and effective in improving the critical thinking skills of elementary students.

scholarly journals Implementation Cooperative Learning Type STAD Assisted Edmodo in Improving Students' Critical Thinking Skills

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Muhamad Epi Rusdin ◽  
Widodo Widodo ◽  
Guntur Maruto
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning At Home

The STAD cooperative learning model can support active, independent and responsible learning for students. The application of this model is expected to improve students' critical thinking skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the improvement of students' critical thinking skills using Edmodo-assisted learning models. Edmodo was modified to become a teacher tool to expand learning at home. This research is an experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design involving 39 students of class VIII MTs At-Taqwa Beru, Sikka, East Nusa Tenggara. Based on the results of the study it was found that the Edmodo-assisted STAD type cooperative learning model can improve students' critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Portfolio Assessment to Increase Critical Thinking Ability for High School Students on Human Coordination System Material

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-136
Author(s):  
Annisa Tiara Linanti ◽  
Saiful Ridlo ◽  
Siti Harnina Bintari
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Coordination System

Critical thinking has an essential role in the development of 21st-century skills to form students who have a deep understanding of the subject being studied. The use of portfolio assessment is believed to be a means of mastering a subject. This study was aimed to analyze whether the implementation of portfolio assessment in Biology learning in human coordination systems material can improve students' critical thinking skills. This study used a pretest and posttest control group design. Based on the results of the analysis, it was found that the means posttest score of students' critical thinking skills in the experimental class was 78.28, and the control class was 63.36. The Independent Sample T-Test showed a significant mean difference between the experimental class and the control class. The improvement of critical thinking skills by implementing portfolio assessment was better than the control class. The regression test showed that the contribution of the portfolio assessment to the improvement of critical thinking skills was 19.1%. The results of the analysis showed that the portfolio assessment distributed students in three categories of critical thinking skills were 59.4% in the enough category, 31.3% in the good category, and 9.4% in the very good category. The conclusion is that the implementation of portfolio assessment has a positive effect on increasing students' critical thinking skills in the human coordination system material.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document