scholarly journals Comparison of STAD Cooperative Learning Types and Direct Learning With Approach Problems Posing With Connection Ability Student Mathematics

Author(s):  
Andi Harpeni Dewantara ◽  
Fitriani Nur ◽  
Munawarah ◽  
Rahmadani ◽  
Lisnasari Andi Mattoliang ◽  
...  
Intersections ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-51
Author(s):  
Aji Permana Putra

The objectives of this research were to find out on  the topic of Sequences and Series: (1) which had better learning achievement among cooperative learning Group Jigsaw II or a direct learning; (2) which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students; (3) at each personality types, which had better learning achievement among Jigsaw II or direct learning, and (4) at each learning models, which had better learning achievement between melancholies students, phlegmatic students, sanguine students or choleric students. This research was a quasi-experimental with 2×4 factorial design. The population was all students of SMK  Muhammadiyah 3 Klaten Utara on Academic Years 2019/2020. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The total of sample was 85 students. Statistical tests using the method Lilliefors test for normality, homogeniety of the Bartlett method, anava test with F test (Fisher) and post hoc test using the Scheffe’ method. The significance level was 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it could  be concluded as follows: (1) Jigsaw II  had better learning achievement than direct learning,; (2) there were no any differences in the learning achievement in mathematics of the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types; (3) in each personality types, the cooperative learning model Jigsaw II  had better than direct learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with melancholies, phlegmatic, sanguine or choleric personality types have the same learning achievement.


Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
NI NYOMAN SRI ARTINI . ◽  
PROF.DR. I MADE CANDIASA, MI.Komp. . ◽  
DR. I MADE KIRNA, M.Si. .

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, (2) pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan bakat numerik siswa terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa, (3) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik tinggi, (4) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik rendah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan yang digunakan adalah two way pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI IA SMAN 2 Semarapura tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 sebanyak 171 orang. Sampel 76 orang siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik simple random sampling dengan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik siswa yang dikumpulkan dengan tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe untuk menguji komparasi pasangan nilai rata-rata tiap kelompok perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara keterampilan berpikir kritis kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dan model pembelajaran langsung (Fh=14,153;pF’(0,05)=4,41).Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Bakat Numerik. This research aimed to analyze (1) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, (2) interaction effect between learning model and students’ numerical talent towards students’ critical thinking ability, (3) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on high numerical talent students, (4) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on low numerical talent students. The research type was a quasi experimental research with two ways pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research population was grade XI A1 students of SMAN 2 Semarapura Academic Year 2013/2014, with the amount 171 students. The sample was 76 students chosen by simple random sampling technique and class equality test. The data research was critical thinking ability and students’ numerical talent collected by critical thinking ability test and numerical talent. The hypothesis testing used ANOVA two paths followed by Scheffe test to test the comparative value pairs on average each treatment group. The research result showed (1) there was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model (Fh=14,153;p˂0,05). The students learnt using Group Investigation cooperative learning model showed better critical thinking ability and numerical talent. (2) There was an interaction effect between learning model and numerical talent towards critical thinking ability (Fh=4,502;p˂0,05). (3) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability students’ levels that using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model on high numerical talent students (Fh=16,68˃F’(0,05)=4,41). (4) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model for low numerical talent students (Fh=1,29˃F’(0,05)=4,41). keyword : Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model, Critical Thinking Ability, Numerical Talent.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Abdoel Gafar ◽  
Firman Tara

This research aims to: (1) Describe the ability to write news text students are taught using STAD type cooperative learning model and students are taught using direct learning model; (2) Describe the ability to write high-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models; (3) Describe the ability to write low-priority student-language text texts that are taught using STAD-type cooperative models and are taught using direct learning models, and (4) Describe the interaction of cooperative learning model type STAD and initial ability to the ability to write news text of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi. The type of this research is quantitative with 2x2 factorial experimental designs. The population of the research is the students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 consisting of 6 classes. The sample of this research is class VIIIA for experiment class with 40 students and class VIIIB for control class with 38 students. Sample determination is determined by purposive sampling technique. The data of students' news text writing capability was obtained using performance test and analyzed using two ways Anova test. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that STAD type cooperative learning model affects the ability to write student news text. The effect can be explained as follows. First, the ability to write news texts of students taught using STAD type cooperative learning model is better than students taught using direct learning model. Second, the ability to write high-priority students' text news taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students taught using direct learning models. Third, the ability to write low-priority students' text taught using STAD type cooperative models is better than students being taught using direct learning models. Fourth, there is no interaction between STAD type cooperative learning model and initial ability to write news text skills of students of class VIII SMP Negeri 24 Jambi.Keywords: Writing News Texts, Cooperative Learning, Direct Learning


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Indah Kumala Sari

This study aims to (1) describe the difference of learning outcomes of science and self efficacy of grade VIII junior high school students using cooperative learning model of STAD assisted by mind map and direct learning model, (2) to describe the difference of learning outcomes of science students of grade VIII of junior high school using cooperative learning model STAD assisted by mind map and direct learning model, and (3) to describe the difference of self efficacy of grade VIII SMP students using cooperative learning model of STAD assisted by mind map and direct learning model. The focus of this research problem is the influence of STAD cooperative learning model on student learning outcomes and self efficacy. This type of research is a quasi-experimental non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The population in this study were all students in grade VIII of SMP Negeri 2 Kuta Selatan consisting of 30 students. The research sample was taken based on group random sampling technique. The data in this research are the scores of students' science learning outcomes and self efficacy scores analyzed using the Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) test. The result of the research shows that (1) there are differences of learning outcomes of science and self efficacy of students using cooperative learning model of STAD assisted by mind map and direct learning model, (2) there is difference of learning result of science student learning with cooperative model of mind map-assistedSTAD and model direct learning, (3) there are differences in self-efficacy of students who learn with the STAD cooperative model and direct learning models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Rosita Rosita ◽  
Rika Valianti ◽  
Nurhasanah Nasution ◽  
Sri Hariani Manurung

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang memperoleh  pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi daripada kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran secara langsung. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa MTs Negeri di kabupaten Labuhanbatu yang berakreditasi A dan B. Sampel penelitian ini adalah MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu dan MTs Negeri 2 berjumlah117 siswa. Validitas instrument angket dilakukan dengan analisis butir menggunakan rumus korelasi Product Moment dan uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus Alpha Cronbach. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji normalitas dengan uji Chi Kuadrat dan untuk menghitung peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah  matematika setelah pembelajaran dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan pembelajaran langsung, maka digunakan uji gain ternormalisasi (g). Siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD memperoleh rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,63 dan siswa yang mendapat model pembelajaran langsung dengan rata-rata peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 0,36. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa ada peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran koopertiftipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran langsung.This study aims to determine the increase in the problem-solving ability of students who get cooperative learning type STAD is higher than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who receive direct learning.This research is a quasi experiment research. The population in this study were all State MTs students in Labuhanbatu district who were accredited A andB. The sample of this research is MTs Negeri 1 Labuhanbatu and MTs Negeri 2 totaling 117 students.The validity of the questionnaire instrument was carried out by analyzing items using the Product Moment correlation formula and reliability testing using the Cronbach Alpha formula. The data analysis technique used the normality test with the Chi Squared test and to calculate the increase in mathematical problem solving skills after learning with STAD cooperative learning and direct learning, the normalized gain test (g) was used. Students who received the STAD cooperative learning model obtained an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.63 and students who received a direct learning model with an average increase in mathematical problem solving abilities of 0.36. Based on the results of the research data analysis, it was found that there was an increase in the problem solving ability of students who took STAD type coopertive learning higher than students who took direct learning. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Tanti Jumaisyaroh Siregar

<p> </p><p><strong>Abstrak:</strong></p><p>Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>jigsaw</em> dengan mahasiswa yang diberi pembelajaran langsung. Penelitian ini merupakan salah satu jenis penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan model kuasi eksperimen dengan <em>pre test-post test control group design</em>. Populasi dalam penelitian ini meliputi seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan matematika salah satu universitas yang berada di Medan. Sampel dalam penelitian ini melibatkan mahasiswa semester IV sebanyak 42 orang pada kelas eksperimen dan 41 orang pada kelas kontrol yang diambil secara acak menggunakan <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Jenis data dalam penelitian ini adalah data kuantitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk memperoleh data dalam penelitian ini adalah tes hasil belajar pada mata kuliah metode numerik yang berbentuk <em>essay test</em>. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik inferensial menggunakan uji-t. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data diperoleh nilai sig = 0.00001 &lt; α = 0,05 sehingga H<sub>o</sub> ditolak dan H<sub>a</sub> diterima yang berarti terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar pada mata kuliah metode numerik antara mahasiswa yang diberi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>jigsaw </em>dibandingkan dengan mahasiswa yang diberi pembelajaran langsung. Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan  rata-rata hasil belajar metode numerik mahasiswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>jigsaw</em> lebih tinggi secara signifikan dibandingkan dengan mahasiswa yang memperoleh pembelajaran langsung. Oleh karena itu, disarankan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe <em>jigsaw</em> dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif untuk dosen matematika dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar metode numerik mahasiswa.</p><p class="Afiliasi"> </p><p><strong>Kata Kunci : </strong></p><p>Hasil Belajar, Pembelajaran Kooperatif, <em>Jigsaw</em>.</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><em>The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in student learning outcomes taught by the type of jigsaw cooperative learning with students who are given direct learning. This research is one type of quantitative research using a quasi-experimental model with a pre-test-post-test control group design. The population in this study included all mathematics education students at a university in Medan. The sample in this study involved 42 semester IV students in the experimental class and 41 people in the control class who were taken randomly using cluster random sampling. The type of data in this research is quantitative data. The instrument used to obtain data in this study was a learning outcome test in a numerical method subject in the form of an essay test. Data were analyzed using inferential statistics using t-test. Based on the results of data analysis, the value of sig = 0.00001 &lt;α = 0.05 so that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means that there are differences in student learning outcomes of the numerical method between students who are given the jigsaw type of cooperative learning compared to students who are given direct learning. Therefore, it can be concluded that the average learning outcomes of the numerical method of students who get the jigsaw type of cooperative learning are significantly higher than students who receive direct learning. Therefore, it is suggested that the jigsaw type of cooperative learning model can be used as an alternative for mathematics lecturers in improving student learning outcomes in numerical methods.</em><em></em></p><p><em>               </em><em></em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:    </em><em></em></p><p><em>Learning Outcomes</em><em>,</em><em>Cooperative Learning, Jigsaw</em><em>.<strong></strong></em></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Diyah Nur Fauziyyah

This aim of this research is to find out the effect of instructional model and emotional intelligence to history learning outcomes in SMAI AL AZHAR 4 Kemang Pratama Bekasi City. This research is quantitative which using experiment design treatment method by level 2x2. The population in this research are all the students in elevent grade,Sampel of research are XI iis 2 and XI iis 3 people a mount 68. Instrument that used to measure the emotional perspicacity is questioner, and instrument that used to measure the learning outcomes multiple choice. The result of this research shows that (1) the student that using cooperative learning type jigsaw is higher than student that using direct learning, (2) there is effect of interaction between instructional model and emotional intelligence, (3) History learning outcomes that using cooperative learning type jigsaw with emotional intelligence is higher than student’s direct learning. (4) History learning outcomes that using cooperative learning type jigsaw with emotional intelligence is lower than student’s direct learning.


1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn M. Gillies

This study compared the effects on behavioural interactions and achievement of (a) cooperative learning in which members were trained to collaborate to facilitate each other's learning and (b) cooperative learning in which members were not trained but were merely told to help each other. One hundred and ninetytwo, Year 6 children participated in the study. Stratified random assignment occurred so that each four-person group consisted of one high-, two medium-, and one low-ability student. All groups were gender balanced. The children worked in their groups on the same social studies unit, three times a week for 12 weeks The results indicated that the children in the Trained groups were consistently more cooperative and helpful to each other, they used language which was more inclusive, and they gave more explanations to assist each other as they worked together. Furthermore, the children in the Trained groups achieved higher learning outcomes than their peers in the Untrained groups.


Author(s):  
Richi Yuliani ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of learners in the subjects of Digital Simulation is under Minimum Criteria of completeness (KKM) which has been established SMKN 2 Mount Talang is 75. This study aims to determine the influence of cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together with direct learning model on student learning outcomes in Digital Simulation subjects students Audio Video Engineering at SMKN 2 Mount Talang. The type of this research is experimental research with the design of quasy-experiment with Posttest-Only Control Design design. The research sample is class X TAV 2 as experiment class using cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together and class X TAV 1 as control class using direct learning model. Data collection techniques from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity test, normality test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class research results obtained an average value of 81.15, while the control class get an average value of 76.50. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got titung> ttable that is 3.05> 2.02, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted. Can be concluded mean at the real level, this research show that, there is influence of student learning result which signifikan between use of model of cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together with direct instruction model on Digital Simulation subject of class X student Audio Video Technique at SMKN 2 Gunung Talang. So the model of learning Numbered Heads Together better in comparison with direct learning model. Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, direct learning model, quasy experimental, learning outcome, eksperimen, control


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document