scholarly journals The Implementation of Cipp Model in Evaluation MGMP Indonesian Language Program at Senior High School 11, Bekasi

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Eka Septiani ◽  
Muchlas Suseno ◽  
Samsi Setiadi

Program evaluation is a form of mechanism used to review program processes that have been implemented over a certain period of time. The review is intended to understand, explore, and correct deficiencies in the program itself. This study was evaluation research using the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product) developed by Stufflebeam. The evaluation subjects were organizer of MGMP, instructors and principal in SMAN 11, Bekasi. The evaluation was conduted in SMAN 11, Bekasi. The data obtained are presented in descriptive qualitative form. Interview, observation, and documentation were utilized as instruments to collect the data. The results of this evaluation reveal that the dimensions of MGMP program planning are generally quite good in terms of the specified context aspect criteria. The dimensions of human resource capacity in implementating the MGMP program have not been optimal in running the program based on the specified input aspect criteria. The dimension of the implementation of the MGMP program have not met all the elements of the process aspect criteria. The dimension of achievement of the MGMP program in improving professionalism of Indonesian language teachers at SMAN 11, Bekasi have been achieved based on the success indicators that have been determined in product aspect.Keywords: MGMP, Program Evaluation, CIPP.

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1360-1367
Author(s):  
Satja Sopha ◽  
◽  
Alexander Nanni

1987 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Kevin O'Reilly ◽  
Michael Dalmat

Applied anthropologists are engaging in evaluation research in increasing numbers these days. As we join the ranks of those who have been conducting program evaluation for years, we find ourselves confronted with a typical evaluator's problem: how can we guarantee that our evaluation results will ever actually be considered in program planning? Some program managers, of course, are only interested in an evaluation when it is required by a funding source. Expecting programs of this sort to seriously consider the results of a carefully planned and executed evaluation is probably naive.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudi Salam ◽  
Soenarto Soenarto

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelenggaraan program SMK Kelas Jauh di MAN Karanganyar.Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian evaluasi dengan pendekatan model context, input, process dan product(CIPP)yang dikembangkan oleh Stuflebeam.Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah angket, wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan teknik deskriptif kuantitatif menggunakan persentase.Hasil penelitian adalah sebagai berikut. (1) Hasil evaluasi context siswa termasuk cukup relevan (23,73), dan evaluasi context guru termasuk relevan (41,14). (2) Hasil evaluasi input siswa menunjukkan skor rata-rata sebesar 43,41 (kategori baik) dan skor rata-rata evaluasi input guru adalah 67,83 (kategori baik). Kurikulum yang digunakan sama dengan kurikulum SMK induk ditambah bahasa Arab dan keterampilan las. (3) Hasil evaluasi process, baik dinilai oleh siswa dengan skor 94,71 maupun oleh guru dengan skor 70,86, termasuk kategori baik. (4) Hasil evaluasi product menurut siswa adalah 9,56 dan menurut guru 15,00 sehingga secara keseluruhan termasuk kategori cukup baik. THE EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DISTANCE CLASS PROGRAM OF VOCATIONAL SCHOOL IN MAN KARANGANYARAbstractThis study aims to evaluate of the implementation of the Distance Class of Vocational School (SMK) in MAN Karanganyar.This study was evaluation research using the context, the inputs, the processes, and the products (CIPP) model developed by Stufflebeam.The data were collected using a questionnaire, interview, observation, and documentation and then analyzed using the percentage descriptive quantitative technique.The findings of research are as follows. (1) The result of the evaluation on the student context is relevant enough (23.73) and the teacher context is relevant. (2) The result of the input evaluation of the students with an average of score 43.41% is in a good category, and the score of the input evaluation of the teacher is in a poor category but the number of the teachers is sufficient with very suitable qualifications. The curriculum used is equal to the curriculum of the center school with two extras: Arabic subject and welding skill. (3) The results of the process evaluation, both students (94.71) and teachers (70.86) are in a good category. (4) The results of the product evaluation are 9.56 (based on the students) and 15.00 (based on the teachers), so that the overall results are in a good category.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. S183-S184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Kumar Marasini ◽  
Ssansa Mugenyi

The multisectoral approach has evolved as a popular instrument to attain nutrition goals and targets. But as policy makers, we need timely, relevant, and accurate information in order to effectively support these plans. This commentary comes from the members of the nutrition secretariats at the National Planning Commission in Nepal and the Office of the Prime Minister in Uganda on availability and use of evidence and the nutrition policy cycle. As has been highlighted in this supplement, some of the challenges we have faced include tracking nutrition spending and limited human resource capacity. It will be important for countries, including our own, to take steps to ensure that all sectors with responsibility for nutrition issues adequately prioritize nutrition—as evidenced by budgets and targets—and coordinate efforts for the most efficient use of funds. Countries will also need to consider the importance of transparency and accountability at all levels, as well as planning and reporting systems to ensure better cooperation and stronger partnerships. Going forward, we call on all those working in the field of nutrition to focus on developing evidence that is useful for decision-making and that can facilitate monitoring of practical measures of governance and financing by national- and district-level stakeholders.


PMLA ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 77 (4-Part2) ◽  
pp. 31-42
Author(s):  
Wilmarth H. Starr

I. Brief History of the Project: Since 1952, the Foreign Language Program of the Modern Language Association of America, responding to the national urgency with regard to foreign languages, has been engaged in a vigorous campaign aimed in large part at improving foreign-language teaching in our country.In 1955, as one of its activities, the Steering Committee of the Foreign Language Program formulated the “Qualifications for Secondary School Teachers of Modern Foreign Languages,” a statement which was subsequently endorsed for publication by the MLA Executive Council, by the Modern Language Committee of the Secondary Education Board, by the Committee on the Language Program of the American Council of Learned Societies, and by the executive boards or councils of the following national and regional organizations: National Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations, American Association of Teachers of French, American Association of Teachers of German, American Association of Teachers of Italian, American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages, Central States Modern Language Teachers Association, Middle States Association of Modern Language Teachers, New England Modern Language Association, Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, Northwest Conference on Foreign Language Teaching, Philological Association of the Pacific Coast, Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association, South Atlantic Modern Language Association, and South-Central Modern Language Association.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document