scholarly journals Verb Metaphoric Extension Under Semantic Strain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel King ◽  
Dedre Gentner

This paper explores the processes underlying verb metaphoric extension. Work on metaphor processing has largely focused on noun metaphor, despite evidence that verb metaphor is more common (e.g., Krennmayr, 2011). Across three experiments, we tested the hypothesis that verb metaphoric extensions arise when a verb-noun pairing results in semantic strain. Experiment 1 showed that verbs are more likely than nouns to alter their meaning under semantic strain (the verb mutability effect). Participants paraphrased simple intransitive sentences like The motor complained (sample paraphrase: The engine revved loudly). We developed a novel methodology of using word2vec to assess the degree of semantic change that occurred from initial sentence to paraphrase for both nouns and verbs. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the verb mutability effect was chiefly due to online meaning adjustments, rather than to differences in polysemy between nouns and verbs. In Experiment 3, we replicated the word2vec results with an assessment using human subjects. The results also showed that nouns and verbs change meaning in qualitatively different ways, with verbs more likely to change meaning metaphorically, and nouns more likely to change meaning taxonomically or metonymically. These findings bear on the origin and processing of verb metaphors and provide a link between online sentence processing and diachronic change over language evolution.

2002 ◽  
Vol 323 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel C.M. Bastiaansen ◽  
Jos J.A. van Berkum ◽  
Peter Hagoort

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Arana ◽  
André Marquand ◽  
Annika Hultén ◽  
Peter Hagoort ◽  
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen

AbstractThe meaning of a sentence can be understood, whether presented in written or spoken form. Therefore it is highly probable that brain processes supporting language comprehension are at least partly independent of sensory modality. To identify where and when in the brain language processing is independent of sensory modality, we directly compared neuromagnetic brain signals of 200 human subjects (102 males) either reading or listening to sentences. We used multiset canonical correlation analysis to align individual subject data in a way that boosts those aspects of the signal that are common to all, allowing us to capture word-by-word signal variations, consistent across subjects and at a fine temporal scale. Quantifying this consistency in activation across both reading and listening tasks revealed a mostly left hemispheric cortical network. Areas showing consistent activity patterns include not only areas previously implicated in higher-level language processing, such as left prefrontal, superior & middle temporal areas and anterior temporal lobe, but also parts of the control-network as well as subcentral and more posterior temporal-parietal areas. Activity in this supramodal sentence processing network starts in temporal areas and rapidly spreads to the other regions involved. The findings do not only indicate the involvement of a large network of brain areas in supramodal language processing, but also indicate that the linguistic information contained in the unfolding sentences modulates brain activity in a word-specific manner across subjects.


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin McManus ◽  
Emma Marsden

This study investigated the effectiveness of providing L1 explicit information (EI) with practice for making more accurate and faster interpretations of L2 FrenchImparfait(IMP). Two treatments were investigated: (a) “L2-only,” providing EI about the L2 with L2 interpretation practice, and (b) “L2+L1,” providing the exact same L2-only treatment and including EI about the L1 (English) with practice interpreting L1 features that are equivalent to the IMP. Fifty L2 French learners were randomly assigned to either L2-only, L2+L1, or a control group. Online (self-paced reading) and offline (context-sentence matching) measures from pretest, posttest, and delayed posttests showed that providing additional L1 EI and practice improved not only offline L2 accuracy, but also the speed of online L2 processing. To our knowledge, this makes original and significant contributions about the nature of EI with practice and the role of the L1 (Tolentino & Tokowicz, 2014), and it extends a recent line of research examining EI effects in online sentence processing (Andringa & Curcic, 2015).


2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 107728
Author(s):  
Elena Barbieri ◽  
Kaitlyn A. Litcofsky ◽  
Matthew Walenski ◽  
Brianne Chiappetta ◽  
Marek-Marsel Mesulam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document