scholarly journals Contextualizing Public Stigma: Endorsed Mental Health Treatment Stigma on College and University Campuses

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Michael Gaddis ◽  
Daniel Ramirez ◽  
Erik Hernandez

Scholars suggest that public mental health stigma operates at a meso-level and is associated with severity of symptoms, disclosure, self-esteem, and treatment-seeking behavior. However, the operationalization of public stigma nearly always comes from an individual-level generalization of what others believe. Using data from over 60,000 students on 75 U.S. college and university campuses between 2009-2015, we contextualize public stigma by creating a school-level measure of students’ individual-level endorsed mental health treatment stigma. We present multilevel logistic regression models for 21 different dependent variables. We find that even after controlling for individual-level stigma scores, school-level stigma is negatively associated with self-reports of suicidal ideation and self-injury, although not associated with screens for depression or anxiety. Moreover, school-level stigma is negatively associated with medication use, counseling and therapy visits, and to a lesser degree, informal support. We suggest that future research should continue to examine the contextual environment of public stigma, while policymakers may be able to implement changes to significantly reduce stigma at this level.

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELLEN HOCHSTEDLER

A comparison of individual-level data on 379 cases involving mentally disordered defendants with aggregate data on criminal sanctions for all defendants in a single jurisdiction provides the basis for a tentative conclusion that mentally disordered defendants may well be “twice-cursed.” The research findings indicate that compared to the general population of defendenats, mentally disordered defendants receive more severe criminal sanctions, and are often subjected to both punishment and mental health treatment ordered on the authority of the criminal court.


SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401987627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Won Min

The purpose of this study is to conduct a cross-cultural comparison of perceived public stigma of mental health and views on mental health treatment effectiveness and their effects on service use among the U.S. adult population of White, Black, and Hispanic ethnic backgrounds. The pooled data came from the 2007, 2009, and 2012 Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, which included unweighted sample sizes of 149,344 Whites, 11,156 Blacks, and 11,072 Hispanic adults aged 55 years old or older. For both 55 to 64 and 65+ age groups, White respondents were most likely to hold greater perceived public stigma. Middle-aged Hispanic adults also showed high levels of perceived public stigma, though not as high as White counterparts. Hispanic adults of both age groups had the least favorable views on the effectiveness of mental health treatment. Among Whites and Hispanics who were not psychologically distressed, unfavorable views on treatment effectiveness significantly reduced the likelihood of seeking mental health services. Given age and ethnic differences in perceived public stigma and views on mental health treatment effectiveness, future efforts aimed at combating stigma should be tailored around various factors for effective intervention strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document