scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

Author(s):  
Mul Iadi

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Elma Nur Hidayati ◽  
Ara Hidayat ◽  
Ukit Ukit

Learning styles can make students learn easily, fun, meaningfully that will improve their learning outcomes. This study aimed to determine the correlation between learning styles and student’s learning outcomes in online learning about structure and function of plant. The correlation test method was used and samples were chosen using simple random sampling, consisting of 68 students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang. The data were collected using interview, questionnaire, documentation methods, and analyzed by Pearson product moment correlation test. The results showed that about 72% students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang tended to have a visual learning style and 75% with completed learning-outcomes. The correlation test indicated that there was no significant relationship between learning styles and their learning outcomes, by evidence and determination value of 0.111 more than 0.05 and 3.8% simultaneously. There is no correlation between learning styles and learning outcomes, presumably because learning styles only contribute 3.8% in which other 96.2% were determined by other factors such as teacher motivation and teaching strategies. However, although there is no correlation, learning styles still contribute to student’s learning success. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research related to other factors that may affect student learning outcomes.


Author(s):  
Ramiyah Ramiyah ◽  
Reh Bungana Beru Perangin Angin ◽  
Yusnadi Yusnadi

The problem in this study is the low learning achievement of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning styles on the Learning Outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The type of research used is a 2x2 factorial design study. The population of this study amounted to 60 students and the sample was taken as a whole from the total population of 60 people consisting of 30 from class Va and 30 from class Vb Elementary School Experiment in Medan. Data collection techniques using questionnaires (questionnaires) and tests. Data analysis techniques used product moment correlation and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) programs. The results obtained indicate that the value of students who have a visual learning style has a difference with students who have auditory learning styles with a sig value of 0.000 and a mean difference of 4.5756. Between students who have a visual learning style, have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.002 and a mean difference of 4.4940. Between students who have auditory learning styles did not have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.998 and a mean difference of only 0.815. The results showed that there was a significant effect between learning styles on the learning outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in the fifth grade students of SD Negeri Experiment City Medan


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kairul Anwar ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah hasil belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dari siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam memberikan pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar Hadits. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan : (1) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan (3) Terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Hadits siswa. Siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual memiliki hasil belajar lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik yang di ajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching. Kata Kunci: metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar hadits Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the learning outcomes of students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style higher than students who have a kinesthetic learning style, and interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in giving effect to the learning outcomes Hadith. The research method using a quasi-experimental design with a 2x2 factorial study. Data were analyzed using ANOVA two lanes on the significant level α = 0.05. The findings show: (1) the learning outcomes Hadith students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, (2) learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style more than in the learning outcomes Hadith students who have kinesthetic learning style, and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes Hadith. Students who have a visual learning style education outcomes are higher when compared with students who have a learning style that kinesthetic learning methods in teaching with hypnoteaching. Keywords: teaching methods and learning styles on learning outcomes hadith


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Adi Sumarsono ◽  
Nyoman Widiantari ◽  
Etriana Meirista

Proses perkuliahan dapat tercapai sesuai arahan kurikulum jika interaksi antara ilmu yang diberikan dan respon penerima dapat terjadi nyata secara linier. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan kecenderungan gaya belajar mahasiswa saat mengikuti perkuliahan pada program Penugasan dosen Sekolah (PDS) pada mata kuliah kepalatihan dasar. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Subyek yang dilibatkan dari penelitian ini sebanyak dua kelas yang terdiri dari masing-masing kelas sebanyak 32 mahasiswa. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah angket skala belajar, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Aspek yang hendak diukur dalam penelitian ini meliputi tiga aspek yaitu, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Hasil penelitian ini adalah terdapat kecenderugan gaya belajar mahasiswa di jurusan pendidikan jasmani kesehatan dan rekreasi dalam mengikuti perkuliahan Implementasi PDS. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa gaya belajar visual sebesar 38,30%, sedangkan gaya belajar auditori sebesar 53,55% dan juga gaya belajar kinestetik mahasiswa sebesar 96,30%. Dari hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa mahasiswa pada jurusan PJKR UNMUS lebih cenderung suka dan mudah dalam memahami jika materi yang disampaikan dalm bentuk di keterampilan yang langsung dipraktekkan dari pada menggunakan gaya belajar yang mempunyai kecenderungan selain kinestetik.  Tendency of  Student Learning Styles in Attending the Implementation of School Lecturer Assignments AbstractThe lecture process can be achieved according to curriculum direction if the interaction between the given knowledge and the recipient's response can occur linearly. The purpose of this study is to describe the tendency of student learning styles when attending lectures in the School Lecturer Assignment (PDS) program in basic course subjects. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive. Subjects involved in this study were as many as two classes consisting of each class of 32 students. The instruments used in this study were study scale questionnaires, interviews and documentation. The aspects to be measured in this study include three aspects namely, visual learning style, auditory learning style and kinesthetic learning style. The results of this study are there are trends in student learning styles in the physical health and recreation education majors in attending PDS Implementation lectures. The results of this study can be explained that the visual learning style is 38.30%, while the auditory learning style is 53.55% and also the kinesthetic learning style is 96.30%. From the results of this study it can be concluded that students in the UNMUS PJKR majors are more likely to like and easily understand if the material delivered preformance in the form of skills that are directly practiced rather than using learning styles that have trends other than kinesthetic.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Marianto Pardosi

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diajar dengan model  pembelajaran inkuiri dan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial, (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 118299 Aek Raso, Teknik penarikan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajarn inkuiri lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditorial, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika antara model pembelajaran inkuiri dan masyarakat belajar, begitu pula anatara gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, inquiri, masyarakat belajar, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditorial, matematika Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with inquiry learning models and those taught with learning communities learning models, (2) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and auditory learning styles , (3) the interaction between learning models and learning styles on learning outcomes in mathematics. The population of this research is all students of grade VI of State Elementary School 118299 Aek Raso, withdrawal technique with cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significant level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught with inquiry learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with learning models of learning communities, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have higher visual learning styles than student learning outcomes which has an auditory learning style, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and learning style on learning outcomes in mathematics. Further test calculations with the Scheffe test show significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between inquiry learning models and learning communities, as well as between visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Keywords: learning model, inquiry, learning society, visual learning style, auditory learning style, mathematics


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document