scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Combined with Regional Hyperthermia in Locally Advanced or Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1279
Author(s):  
Oliver J. Ott ◽  
Cihan Gani ◽  
Lars H. Lindner ◽  
Manfred Schmidt ◽  
Ulf Lamprecht ◽  
...  

Background: To prospectively analyze feasibility and pathological complete response (pCR) rates of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) in patients with locally advanced (LARC) or recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer. Methods: between 2012 and 2018, 111 patients with UICC stage IIB-IV or any locally recurrent rectal cancer were included (HyRec-Trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01716949). Patients received radiotherapy with concurrent 5-Fluororuracil (5-FU)/Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin, and RHT. Stage 1 feasibility analysis evaluated dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) after 19 patients, stage 2 after 59 evaluable patients. Analysis of the pCR rate was based on histopathological reports. Results: the feasibility rates for stages 1 and 2 were 90% (17/19) and 73% (43/59), respectively. In the intention-to-treat population the pCR rate was 19% (20/105; 90% confidence interval (CI) 13.0–26.5). In the per-protocol-analysis, complete tumor regression was seen in 28% (18/64) and 38% (3/8) of the patients with LARC and LRRC, respectively. Complete resection rates (R0) among patients with LARC and LRRC who received surgery were 99% (78/84) and 67% (8/12). Conclusions: the intensified neoadjuvant and multimodality treatment schedule was feasible and led to comparable early toxicity rates as described by other trials that used the similar chemoradiation protocol. The presented treatment regimen resulted in a very high pCR rate and appears as a promising option for patients with LRRC.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3569-3569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaolin Zhou ◽  
Guole Lin ◽  
Yuhua Gong ◽  
Yanyan Zhang ◽  
Yan-Fang Guan ◽  
...  

3569 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is nowadays the standard of care for the locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, there is no effective method to predict patients’ possible benefits from nCRT and monitor the response to it. Methods: Patients with locally advanced middle and low rectal cancer of stage cT3-4N0M0 or cTanyN+M0 were enrolled from August 2017 to July 2018. All patients received nCRT with long-term radiation plus fluorouracil based chemotherapy, followed by the radical surgery. Serial plasma samples were collected pre-nCRT, during nCRT, and preoperatively (8 weeks after the completion of nCRT). Somatic mutations were detected with next-generation sequencing using a 1021-gene panel with peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA as a germline control. Results: This prospective cohort study enrolled 61 patients with rectal cancer. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate and the downstage rate was 31% (19/61) and 80% (49/61), respectively. ctDNA was detectable in 77% (47/61), 18% (11/61) and 13% (8/61) of blood samples obtained pre-nCRT, during nCRT and preoperatively, respectively. No significant association was observed between pre-nCRT ctDNA status with any clinicopathological factors, including age, gender, differentiation or tumor circumferential extent. Among the 8 patients with detectable ctDNA preoperatively, pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) of CAP 2-3 were observed and hepatic metastasis was found in 4 patients within 2 months. For patients with undetectable pre-operative ctDNA, a higher proportion archived pathological downstaging (85% vs 50%). The correlation between preoperative ctDNA status and achievement of pathological downstage was independent of age, gender or differentiation (p = 0.02). In addition, preoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with the persistently involved lymph node (p = 0.02). However, neither pre-nCRT nor during-nCRT ctDNA status was associated with pathological downstaging or persistently lymph node involvement. Conclusions: Detectable ctDNA after the completion of nCRT is a predicator of unsatisfactory curative effect of patients with LARC, which might indicate novel treatment intensification studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03042000.


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00158
Author(s):  
Ashray Gunjur ◽  
Grace Chazan ◽  
Genni Newnham ◽  
Sue-Anne McLachlan

PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients’ tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Huang ◽  
Xiao-ying Lou ◽  
Ya-xi Zhu ◽  
Yu-chen Wang ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Here, we analyzed the impact of local and systemic environments on the tumor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. We recruited 141 patients with rectal cancer treated with nCRT. We evaluated the local tumor environment, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), intratumor budding (ITB), and the systemic inflammatory environment, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. Our finding revealed that tumor regression was significantly associated with the density of CD8+ TILs in the intraepithelial, the presence of ITB, the combination of NLR and CRP (NLR-CRP) value, and the combination of CD8+ intraepithelial TIL (iTIL) density and ITB presence. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that only the combination of CD8+ iTILs and ITB was an independent predictive factor for the pathological response to nCRT in rectal cancer. Our finding demonstrate that the local tumor environment was a better predictor of the tumor response than the systemic environment and thus provided new insight into screening for patients who are more likely to benefit from cancer treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document