Comparison of Different Systemic Therapeutic Regimes in Resectable Soft-Tissue Sarcoma—Results of a Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The standard treatment of high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma consists of surgical resection followed by risk-adapted radiation therapy. Further treatment options that may improve local and systemic tumor control, including chemotherapy, are not well established. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, different systemic approaches as well as their application at different time points have been attempted. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials in the treatment of localized, resectable high-risk adult soft-tissue sarcoma comparing different treatment modalities according to the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted published hazard ratios and number of events for the endpoints overall and disease-free survival (OS; DFS) as well as local and distant recurrence-free interval (LRFI; DRFI). The different modalities were compared in a network meta-analysis against the defined standard treatment surgery ± radiotherapy using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Results: The literature search identified 25 trials including 3453 patients. Five different treatment modalities were compared in the network meta-analysis. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (HR = 0.86; CI-95%: 0.75–0.97; p = 0.017). Likewise, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (naCTx + HTx) also led to superior OS (HR = 0.45; CI-95%: 0.20–1.00; p = 0.049). Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (naCTx) and perioperative chemotherapy (periCTx) did not improve OS (HR = 0.61; CI-95%: 0.29–1.29; p = 0.195 and HR = 0.66; CI-95%: 0.30–1.48; p = 0.317, respectively). Histology-tailored chemotherapy (htCTx) also did not improve survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.45–2.61; p = 0.868). The network analysis of DFS, LRFI, and DRFI revealed a similar pattern between the different treatment regimens. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS, LRFI, and DRFI compared to surgery ± radiotherapy. In direct comparison, this advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to male patients (HR = 0.78; CI-95%: 0.65–0.92; p = 0.004) with no effect for female patients (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.90–1.29; p = 0.410). Conclusions: Standardized chemotherapy in high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma appears to be of added value irrespective of timing. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be restricted to male patients. The addition of regional hyperthermia to neodjuvant chemotherapy achieved the best effect sizes and might warrant further investigation.

Download Full-text

Comparison of different systemic therapeutic regimes in resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcoma: Results of a network meta-analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.11549 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 11549-11549

Author(s):

Jan Haussmann ◽

Wilfried Budach ◽

Edwin Boelke ◽

Balint Tamaskovics ◽

Freddy Joel Djiepmo Njanang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽

Literature Search ◽

Standard Treatment ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Tumor Control ◽

Regional Hyperthermia

11549 Background: The treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk or the extremities consists of surgical resection with risk-adapted radiation therapy. Further treatment options which can significantly improve local and systemic tumor control including chemotherapy are not well established. Due to the heterogeneity of disease different systemic approaches as well as their application during different time points have been attempted. Methods: We conducted a literature search for randomized clinical trials in the treatment of localized, resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcoma comparing different treatment modalities according to the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted published hazard ratios and number of events for the endpoints of overall and disease-free survival (OS; DFS) as well as local and distant recurrence-free interval (LRFI; DRFI). The different modalities were compared in a network meta-analysis against the defined standard treatment surgery ± radiotherapy using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model (ivhet) with the help of the Microsoft Excel add-in Meta-XL V5.3. Results: The literature search identified 25 studies including 3489 patients. The network analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCTx) results in a significant improvement in overall survival (HR = 0.86; CI-95%: 0.75-0.97; p = 0.017) compared to the standard treatment of surgery ± radiatherapy alone. Combined treatment with regional hyperthermia and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HTx+nadjCTx) also improves OS (HR = 0.45; CI-95%: 0.20-1.00; p = 0.049). Preoperative chemotherapy alone (nadjCTx) as well as perioperative chemotherapy (periopCTx) resulted both in non-statistically significant improvements in OS (HR = 0.61; CI-95%: 0.29-1.29; p = 0.195) and (HR = 0.48; CI-95%: 0.15-1.55; p = 0.218). Histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tNaCTx) also showed no effect on overall survival (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.45-2.61; p = 0.868). The analysis of DFS, LRFI and DRFI disclosed a similar pattern between the different treatment regimens. Conclusions: The addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy in resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcomas provides a measurable benefit in overall survival. Shifting of systemic therapy to the neoadjuvant setting and combination with regional hyperthermia might be favored. Predictive clinical and molecular markers are needed to evaluate and limit potentional risks prospectively going forward.

Download Full-text