Nonspecific Chronic Back Pain: Sixth Edition Approaches

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Ratings for “non-specific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” are based on the diagnosis-based impairment method whereby an impairment class, usually representing a range of impairment values within a cell of a grid, is selected by diagnosis and “specific criteria” (key factors). Within the impairment class, the default impairment value then can be modified using non-key factors or “grade modifiers” such as functional history, physical examination, and clinical studies using the net adjustment formula. The diagnosis of “nonspecific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” can be rated in class 0 and 1; the former has a default value of 0%, and the latter has a default value of 2% before any modifications. The key concept here is that the physician believes that the patient is experiencing pain, yet there are no related objective findings, most notably radiculopathy as distinguished from “nonverifiable radicular complaints.” If the individual is found not to have radiculopathy and the medical record shows that the patient has never had clinically verifiable radiculopathy, then the diagnosis of “intervertebral disk herniation and/or AOMSI [alteration of motion segment integrity] cannot be used.” If the patient is asymptomatic at maximum medical improvement, then impairment Class 0 should be chosen, not Class 1; a final whole person impairment rating of 1% indicates incorrect use of the methodology.

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach

Abstract Spinal stenosis refers to narrowing of the spinal canal that may result in compression of the spinal cord, or cauda equina. The most common type of spinal stenosis is degenerative stenosis associated with the natural process of aging. In the lumbar spine, the narrowing may result in compression of spinal nerve roots, causing a constellation of symptoms that may include lower pack pain, neurogenic claudication, and lower extremity pain. This case illustrates the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition process of assessing impairment for spinal stenosis. The case involves a 54-year-old male truck driver whose lumbar spine was injured when he unloaded and lifted a tire; he underwent lumbar decompression at L3-4 and L4-5, and fourteen months after surgery was evaluated as being at maximum medical improvement, was able to walk, and could void spontaneously. In a one-page final medical report, the patient's physician hand wrote a note assigning 29% whole person impairment without a medical rationale to support the rating. The author of this case example first notes that the medical reporting does not support placing this patient in class 4, and the examinee's condition is most consistent with a class 1 rating for spinal stenosis. Using Section 17.3, Adjustment Grids and Grade Modifiers: Non-Key Factors, an evaluator would conclude a grade B, 6% whole person impairment for the lumbar spine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Luers

Abstract Spinal impairment evaluation includes determination of the presence or absence of alteration of motion segment integrity (AOMSI). The diagnosis-related estimate (DRE) method is the principal methodology used to evaluate spinal AOMSI impairment in the fourth and fifth editions of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides). In the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, impairment ratings are calculated using the diagnosis-based impairment (DBI) method that uses five impairment classes determined by diagnoses and specific criteria, adjusted by consideration of non-key factors and grade modifiers. This article includes a correction of numbers in the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, Figure 17-6. The following factors must be considered to determine if AOMSI is present: 1) flexion/extension radiographs are performed when the individual is at maximum medical improvement and are technically adequate; 2) the proper methodology is used in obtaining measurements of translation and angular motion; 3) normal translation and angular-motion thresholds consistent with the literature are used in determining AOMSI. Imaging modalities such as videofluoroscopy, digital fluoroscopy, and upright/motion magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to establish an AOMSI permanent impairment using the AMA Guides. A number of technical factors can affect the image quality associated with measurements of AOMSI, including film centering, artifacts, poor edge resolution, endplate normal variations and spurring, and use of analog rather than digital radiography.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract The most common source of occupational skin disease is contact dermatitis, an inflammation caused by exposure to an allergen. Whenever possible, the evaluating physician should rely on objective evidence such as lichenification, excoriation, and hyperpigmentation rather than subjective complaints. Patch testing, biopsy, and sensory discrimination tests are reliable tools at the evaluating physician's disposal. Disfigurements of the face are rated using the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, Section 11.3, The Face, and Chapter 8, The Skin, is used for all other skin impairments. The evaluating physician records the history of the injury, evaluates the patient, and, in consultation with Table 8-3, notes any objective clinical studies to diagnose the pathology. The functional history, physical examination findings, and diagnostic test findings values then are assigned using Table 8-2; the functional history acts as the key factor and determines the patient's impairment class, physical examination, and diagnostic test findings, each acting as non-key factors, or modifiers. Finally, the non-key factors are used to modify the impairment rating from its default value within its impairment class, and the result is the final skin impairment rating expressed as whole person impairment. Chapter 8 is used only rarely in impairment rating in workers’ compensation cases, and examiners should study the chapter carefully before using it.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-9
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Evaluating physicians may need to account for the effects of multiple impairments using a summary value. In the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, the Combined Values Chart provides a method to combine two or more impairment percentages based on the formula A + B(1 – A) = the combined value of A and B. Using the Combined Values Chart and this formula, physicians can combine multiple impairments so that the whole person impairment is equal to or less than the sum of all the individual impairment values. The AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, specifies that “impairments are successively combined by first combining the largest number with the next largest remaining number, and then further combining it with the next largest remaining number … until all given impairment numbers are combined.” Impairment values within a region generally are combined and converted to whole person permanent impairment before being combined with values from other regions. The article reviews the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, approach to combining upper extremity impairments, lower extremity impairments, and combining spinal impairments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Blaisdell Jay ◽  
James Talmage

Abstract Of the many types of abdominal wall hernias, inguinal hernias are, by far, the most common type and typically present in males in workers’ compensation cases who report the cause as heavy lifting. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Disease and Injury Causation, Second Edition, indicates that genetics (family history) is the strongest risk factor. Conditions that chronically increase intra-abdominal pressure (eg, obesity, ascites, or pregnancy) and smoking are statistically associated with abdominal wall hernias, but no good studies show an increased risk of hernia formation in laborers. Abdominal hernias with palpable defects or protrusions usually are corrected with surgery, and the outcome typically warrants an impairment of 0%. In the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, Section 6.6, Hernias, and Table 6-10, Criteria for Rating Permanent Impairment Due to Hernias, are used for ratings. The rating scheme in the internal medicine chapters differs from that found in the musculoskeletal chapters because the rater uses a key factor of two of three potential variables—history, physical findings, and objective findings—to select the impairment class. Like the grade modifiers in the musculoskeletal chapters, the other variables (other than the key factors) then are used to modify the impairment rating within the impairment class. Most hernias are not due to injury and result in 0% whole person permanent impairment after repair.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Low back pain and disability are common and evaluating a patient with non-specific spinal pain may be challenging, including determining impairment. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, provides ratable impairment for the diagnosis of “non-specific chronic, or chronic recurrent low back pain (also known as chronic sprain/strain, symptomatic degenerative disc disease, facet joint pain,” and others. The evaluator should consider the diagnosis of non-specific chronic back pain only when no category of specific diagnosis fits the case (eg, no fracture, no spinal stenosis) or when “no reliable physical examination or imaging findings” but the patient's history of pain is felt to be reliable. According to the AMA Guides, primary determinant between a class 0 and class 1 rating for non-specific chronic back pain is whether the evaluator gives credibility to the patient's subjective reports of pain and interference with activities of daily living (ADLs). An evaluator may choose to use the Pain Disability Questionnaire (reproduced in the article) and Table 17-6, Functional History Adjustment, Spine, to determine the Functional History Grade Modifier (GMFH). The diagnosis of non-specific chronic or chronic recurrent low back pain yields a positive impairment only when the evaluator feels the patient's pain, as quantified by the GMFH, is reliably reported. Because there are no diagnostic objective findings on physical examination or clinical studies, these modifiers are excluded.


Author(s):  
Emily Freeman ◽  
Jennifer F. Johnson ◽  
John C. Godbold, Jr ◽  
Ronald J. Riegel

Historically, the evaluation and assessment of the clinical response to treatment for canine back pain is subjective and relies on owner and clinician assessment of pain. This study evaluated the use of sequential infrared thermal images as a measure of the response of canine patients with back pain to a prescribed series of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) treatments. Qualifying participants had histories of pain and dysfunction associated with spinal osteoarthritis or intervertebral disk disease, or of non-specific uni- or bilateral back pain along the paravertebral epaxial muscles. Each patient was initially thermally imaged prior to PBMT treatment and then received multiple PBMT treatments delivered to the appropriate spinal area on days 1, 2, 3, and 4. Participants were reimaged on day 7. Thermal images provided an objective measure of superficial temperature changes over the area of PBMT treatment of each patient after the PBMT regimen. The temperature correlated with statistically significant changes in Colorado State University Canine Chronic Pain Scale scoring (CPS) and owner assessment using the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI), which includes a Pain Severity Score (PSS) and Pain Interference Score (PIS). The correlation of objective thermal imaging data with more subjective outcome measures suggests thermal imaging may be a valuable additional tool in monitoring therapy outcome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Mayr ◽  
Pauline Jahn ◽  
Anne Stankewitz ◽  
Bettina Deak ◽  
Anderson Winkler ◽  
...  

AbstractWe investigated how the trajectory of pain patients’ ongoing and fluctuating pain is encoded in the brain. In repeated fMRI sessions, 20 chronic back pain patients and 20 chronic migraineurs were asked to continuously rate the intensity of their endogenous pain. Linear mixed effects models were used to disentangle cortical processes related to pain intensity and to pain intensity changes. We found that the intensity of pain in chronic back pain patients is encoded in the anterior insula, the frontal operculum, and the pons; the change of pain of chronic back pain and chronic migraine patients is mainly encoded in the anterior insula. At the individual level, we identified a more complex picture where each patient exhibited their own signature of endogenous pain encoding. The diversity of the individual cortical signatures of chronic pain encoding results adds to the understanding of chronic pain as a complex and multifaceted disease.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Marjorie Eskay-Auerbach ◽  
J. Edward Blaisdell

Abstract For workers’ compensation, most requests for a permanent impairment rating of low back injuries involve the diagnostic labels of nonspecific chronic low back pain or intervertebral disk herniation. Use of the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, to choose the right diagnosis and class for these injuries is the first step and involves correctly choosing between “nonverifiable radicular complaints” and “residual radiculopathy.” Evaluators must be able to distinguish persisting radiculopathy, as defined in the sixth edition, from resolved radiculopathy and from nonverifiable radicular complaints and to support findings with objective clinical evidence. Clinical evidence of chronic radiculopathy might include motor weakness, muscle atrophy, impaired sharp–dull discrimination, and/or abnormal electrodiagnostic tests, provided the findings are persistent and there are reflex abnormalities. When considering radiculopathy in the appropriate spine grid of the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, the evaluator must distinguish radicular (limb) symptoms that are continuous, intermittent, or completely resolved. Positive electromyography (EMG) studies for acute radiculopathy are a sufficient objective finding to state the person has radiculopathy on the date of the test; individuals with positive needle EMG do have persisting radiculopathy at maximum medical improvement, but this does not mean that radiculopathy must persist despite time and treatment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Mayr ◽  
Pauline Jahn ◽  
Bettina Deak ◽  
Anne Stankewitz ◽  
Vasudev Devulapally ◽  
...  

Background. Chronic pain diseases are characterised by an ongoing and fluctuating endogenous pain, yet it remains to be elucidated how this is reflected by the dynamics of ongoing functional cortical connections. The present study addresses this disparity by taking the individual perspective of pain patients into account, which is the varying intensity of endogenous pain. Methods. To this end, we investigated the cortical encoding of 20 chronic back pain patients and 20 chronic migraineurs in four repeated fMRI sessions. During the recording, the patients were asked to continuously rate their pain intensity. A brain parcellation approach subdivided the whole brain into 408 regions. A 10 s sliding-window connectivity analysis computed the pair-wise and time-varying connectivity between all brain regions across the entire recording period. Linear mixed effects models were fitted for each pair of brain regions to explore the relationship between cortical connectivity and the observed trajectory of the patients' fluctuating endogenous pain. Results. Two pain processing entities were taken into account: pain intensity (high, middle, low pain) and the direction of pain intensity changes (rising vs. falling pain). Overall, we found that periods of high and increasing pain were predominantly related to low cortical connectivity. For chronic back pain this applies to the pain intensity-related connectivity for limbic and cingulate areas, and for the precuneus. The change of pain intensity was subserved by connections in left parietal opercular regions, right insular regions, as well as large parts of the parietal, cingular and motor cortices. The change of pain intensity direction in chronic migraine was reflected by decreasing connectivity between the anterior insular cortex and orbitofrontal areas, as well as between the PCC and frontal and ACC regions. Conclusions. Interestingly, the group results were not mirrored by the individual patterns of pain-related connectivity, which is suggested to deny the idea of a common neuronal core problem for chronic pain diseases. In a similar vein, our findings are supported by the experience of clinicians, who encounter patients with a unique composition of characteristics: personality traits, various combinations of symptoms, and a wide range of individual responses to treatment. The diversity of the individual cortical signatures of chronic pain encoding results adds to the understanding of chronic pain as a complex and multifaceted disease. The present findings support recent developments for more personalised medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document