scholarly journals Neighborhood Effects Explain Increasing Asynchronous Seedling Survival in a Subtropical Forest

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Yunquan Wang ◽  
Xiangcheng Mi ◽  
Xiaojuan Liu ◽  
Haibao Ren ◽  
...  
Ecology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Yunquan Wang ◽  
Xiangcheng Mi ◽  
Xiaojuan Liu ◽  
Haibao Ren ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heming Liu ◽  
Guochun Shen ◽  
Zunping Ma ◽  
Qingsong Yang ◽  
Jianyang Xia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 483 ◽  
pp. 118924
Author(s):  
Heming Liu ◽  
Daniel J. Johnson ◽  
Qingsong Yang ◽  
Mingjie Xu ◽  
Zunping Ma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi He ◽  
Heming Liu ◽  
Qingsong Yang ◽  
Ye Cao ◽  
Mengfang Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Neighborhood effects are a crucial ecological process that allow species to coexist in a forest. Conspecific and heterospecific neighbors, as major classified groups, affect tree mortality through various mechanisms associating with neighbor life stages. However, how neighbor life stages influence neighborhood effects and by what mechanisms remains a knowledge gap. Here we censused the mortality of 82,202 trees representing 30 species in a 20-ha subtropical forest and classified their neighbors into the following life stages: earlier, same and later. Then, we ran generalized linear mixed models to estimate the effect of neighbors at different life stages on tree mortality. Our results showed that conspecific later stage neighbors have effects on increasing tree mortality overall, whereas conspecific earlier stage neighbors have effects on decreasing. Furthermore, these opposing effects could offset each other so that the overall effect of conspecific neighbors on juvenile mortality seems small. In contrast, heterospecific neighbors have effects on decreasing tree mortality overall. These effects are consistent with those of later stage heterospecific neighbors. Our findings demonstrate that neighbors importantly impact tree mortality, and their specific effects are closely related to neighbor life stages. Any single effect from one neighbor life stage could disturb or dominate the total effects of the neighbors. Therefore, the neighbors must be divided into different life stages to best explain the neighborhood effect on forest dynamics.


2015 ◽  
pp. rtv006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junmeng Lu ◽  
Daniel J. Johnson ◽  
Xiujuan Qiao ◽  
Zhijun Lu ◽  
Qinggang Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Diane Pecher ◽  
Inge Boot ◽  
Saskia van Dantzig ◽  
Carol J. Madden ◽  
David E. Huber ◽  
...  

Previous studies (e.g., Pecher, Zeelenberg, & Wagenmakers, 2005) found that semantic classification performance is better for target words with orthographic neighbors that are mostly from the same semantic class (e.g., living) compared to target words with orthographic neighbors that are mostly from the opposite semantic class (e.g., nonliving). In the present study we investigated the contribution of phonology to orthographic neighborhood effects by comparing effects of phonologically congruent orthographic neighbors (book-hook) to phonologically incongruent orthographic neighbors (sand-wand). The prior presentation of a semantically congruent word produced larger effects on subsequent animacy decisions when the previously presented word was a phonologically congruent neighbor than when it was a phonologically incongruent neighbor. In a second experiment, performance differences between target words with versus without semantically congruent orthographic neighbors were larger if the orthographic neighbors were also phonologically congruent. These results support models of visual word recognition that assume an important role for phonology in cascaded access to meaning.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon P. Liversedge ◽  
Jingxin Wang ◽  
Jing Tian ◽  
Weijin Han ◽  
Kevin B. Paterson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document