The State of Water Environment Research : Looking Back

1996 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Charles N. Haas
1992 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 659-659
Author(s):  
Charles N. Haas

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Marttunen ◽  
Jyri Mustajoki ◽  
Suvi Sojamo ◽  
Lauri Ahopelto ◽  
Marko Keskinen

Water security demands guaranteeing economic, social and environmental sustainability and simultaneously addressing the diversity of risks and threats related to water. Various frameworks have been suggested to support water security assessment. They are typically based on indexes enabling national comparisons; these may, however, oversimplify complex and often contested water issues. We developed a structured and systemic way to assess water security and its future trends via a participatory process. The framework establishes a criteria hierarchy for water security, consisting of four main themes: the state of the water environment; human health and well-being; the sustainability of livelihoods; and the stability, functions and responsibility of society. The framework further enables the analysis of relationships between the water security criteria as well as between water, energy and food security. The framework was applied to a national water security assessment of Finland in 2018 and 2030. Our experience indicates that using the framework collaboratively with stakeholders provides a meaningful way to improve understanding and to facilitate discussion about the state of water security and the actions needed for its improvement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 1103-1112
Author(s):  
Ch. Liu ◽  
I. N. Bondarenko ◽  
A. Yu. Panchenko ◽  
N. I. Slipchenko

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 801-811
Author(s):  
Ch. Liu ◽  
I. N. Bondarenko ◽  
A. Yu. Panchenko ◽  
N. I. Slipchenko

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
V. B. Korobov ◽  
I. V. Miskevich ◽  
A. S. Lokhov ◽  
K. A. Seredkin

Abstract: pH is one of the most important parameters characterizing the state of water systems. The arithmetic mean values of samples are often used when averaging serial pH measurements in water bodies, as is usually done for other characteristics of the state of the natural environment (temperature, salinity, oxygen concentrations, suspended solids, etc.). However, in this case such an operation is illegal, since the addition of logarithms, which by definition are pH, is non-additive. The authors conducted a study to determine the extent to which pH variability in natural objects such an operation would not distort the results. For this, several samples of the pH index were generated in various ranges of its theoretically possible and natural variability. It was established that with pH variability of less than a unit characteristic of marine pH values, the statistical characteristics of the indicator and [H+ ] concentrations differ slightly, and the medians of the samples coincide. It is concluded that with such ranges characteristic of the waters of the oceans, there is no need to recalculate previously obtained results. However, for the estuaries of rivers flowing into tidal seas, as shown by field measurements, the pH variability in the mixing zone of sea and river waters is several times higher. Similar situations may occur when heavy precipitation falls on the water surface, as well as during floods. In these cases, a simple averaging of the pH values will no longer be correct. In such cases, the use of other averaging algorithms and the choice of stable statistical characteristics are required.


1972 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bosáček ◽  
Z. Tvarůžková
Keyword(s):  

IFLA Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Stirling ◽  
Gildas Illien ◽  
Pascal Sanz ◽  
Sophie Sepetjan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document