Risk assessment and genetic counseling for Lynch syndrome – Practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer

Author(s):  
Spring Holter ◽  
Michael J. Hall ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Kory Jasperson ◽  
Sonia S. Kupfer ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16510-e16510
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Sherman ◽  
Beth Crawford ◽  
Karen Giammicchio ◽  
Lisa Kimbro ◽  
Agnes Masny ◽  
...  

e16510 Background: In 2010 NCCN conducted a Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling (RA/GC) study focused on the operational aspects of RA/GC programs and services at NCCN Member Institutions (MIs). The primary aims were benchmarking of RA/GC operations and practice patterns. Methods: A survey instrument was developed by NCCN staff in consultation with RA/GC leaders at NCCN MIs. The survey collected quantitative and descriptive data on RA/GC program organization, staffing, and patient volume and also included questions on patient referral, test disclosure, and program funding. Results: 19/21 (90%) NCCN MIs participated. The mean number of patients seen annually for 17 MIs reporting data was 872 (range 130 – 2,200). The mean number of patients seen annually per 1.0 genetic counseling full-time equivalent was 272 (range 152 – 422). RA/GC services are made available to patients by scheduled appointment only at 5 MIs (26%) versus by appointment or with on-call genetic counselors at 14 MIs (74%). However, 11/19 (58%) MIs reported the time between initial patient contact and appointment was greater than 2 weeks. Self-sufficient RA/GC program funding was consistently cited by survey respondents as one of the greatest challenges, with 18 MIs indicating that they require institutional support, whereas only 11 indicated that reimbursement from third-party payors contributed to funding. Pertaining to disclosure, respondents estimated that 48% of test results were disclosed to patients via telephone and 39% in-person. The remaining disclosures were made based on patient preference. Conclusions: The availability of on-call RA/GC resources at most NCCN MIs likely indicates an effort to increase the number of patients that receive RA/GC services, but based on times to first appointment, access remains an issue. The 2011 recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors state that the disclosure of test results in-person is often very helpful. However, the percentage given by telephone remains substantial. Dissemination of RA/GC benchmark data and identification of best practices will promote enhanced operations and patient access at NCCN MIs.


2019 ◽  
pp. 171-186
Author(s):  
Barbara B. Biesecker ◽  
Kathryn F. Peters ◽  
Robert Resta

The field of genetic counseling has historically valued the role of research. More recently, graduate programs have raised the standards for student thesis projects so that a greater percent are of publishable quality. The profession has acknowledged key research gaps, such as a lack of consensus on the primary client outcomes of counseling. Further, the National Society of Genetic Counselors has endorsed the importance of evidence that may be used to guide practice. Herein we present the role of genetic counselors as researchers and discuss approaches to designing research studies to answer key service delivery questions and patient-reported outcomes. To frame research in genetic counseling, health behavior and social psychology theories offer models for identifying key variables likely to predict client decisions and their outcomes. To date, studies in genetic counseling have been framed by the self-regulation model and the theory of planned behavior. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in genetic counseling identified psychological well-being and gain in knowledge as the most prevalent patient outcomes. Evidence can be used to predict decisions to undergo genetic testing or follow up on results.


Author(s):  
Barbara B. Biesecker ◽  
Kathryn F. Peters ◽  
Robert Resta

The definition of genetic counseling has evolved from being proscriptive to the triumvirate of patient education, facilitating informed decision making, and adaptation to a risk or condition. This definition, endorsed by the National Society of Genetic Counselors, has been widely cited and used in graduate training around the globe. Despite significant advances in the roles of genetic counselors, the central tenets of counseling remain. Our practice model was previously described as psychoeducational but has evolved to psychotherapeutic to emphasize relational counseling. The goals of genetic counseling are specific, vary by subspecialty, and evolve with advances in genomic science. In the cancer setting much of genetic counseling is about cancer risk and the potential value of predictive testing to inform choices, whereas in the pediatric setting, the goal is to diagnose or determine a cause for a child’s condition.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2404-2404
Author(s):  
Jill S. Goldman ◽  
Susan E. Hahn ◽  
Jennifer Williamson Catania ◽  
Susan LaRusse-Eckert ◽  
Melissa Barber Butson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 692-714
Author(s):  
Heather B. Radtke ◽  
Amanda L. Bergner ◽  
Allison L. Goetsch ◽  
Caroline McGowan ◽  
Karin Panzer ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyn McConkie-Rosell ◽  
Brenda Finucane ◽  
Amy Cronister ◽  
Liane Abrams ◽  
Robin L. Bennett ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronson D. Riley ◽  
Julie O. Culver ◽  
Cécile Skrzynia ◽  
Leigha A. Senter ◽  
June A. Peters ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Resta ◽  
Barbara Bowles Biesecker ◽  
Robin L. Bennett ◽  
Sandra Blum ◽  
Susan Estabrooks Hahn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document