Multirecombined Evolutionary Algorithm Inspired in the Selfish Gene Theory to Face the Weighted Tardiness Scheduling Problem

2004 ◽  
pp. 809-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Villagra ◽  
M. De San Pedro ◽  
M. Lasso ◽  
D. Pandolfi
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
Scheduling Problem ◽  
Selfish Gene ◽  
Weighted Tardiness ◽  
Gene Theory ◽  
Selfish Gene Theory

Unnatural Selection

Philosophy ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Miles
Keyword(s):  
Natural Selection ◽  
Genetic Code ◽  
Evolutionary Psychology ◽  
Selfish Gene ◽  
Gene Theory ◽  
Human Sociobiology ◽  
Selfish Gene Theory ◽  
George Williams

This paper shows how the last twenty-five years of vocal human Darwinism (human sociobiology and evolutionary psychology) directly rejects the ‘selfish gene’ theory it is supposedly based upon. ‘Evangelistic sociobiology’, as Dawkins has called it, argues that humans evolved to be ‘the altruistic ape’. Using selfish gene theory this paper shows that we are born just another selfish ape. Given the ‘gross immorality’ (George Williams) of natural selection, one implication is that modern genetics has yet to face up to our true genetic code. The ultimate conclusion of this paper is that culture makes civilisation possible because it overwrites, or ‘manipulates’, our genetic heritage. We are born ape, but made human.

The validity of Dawkins's selfish gene theory and the role of the unconscious in decision making

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-149
Author(s):  
Tobias A. Mattei
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Goal Theory ◽  
The Unconscious ◽  
Human Actions ◽  
Unconscious Processes ◽  
Selfish Gene ◽  
Gene Theory ◽  
Psychological Structure ◽  
Selfish Gene Theory

AbstractAlthough the proposed Selfish Goal Theory constitutes a major theoretical tour de force for addressing the issue of inconsistencies in human actions and the role of motivational goals in behavior, as it is based on an unproven biological paradigm (Dawkins's selfish gene theory) and overemphasizes the role of unconscious processes in decision making, it provides a questionable model of the underlying psychological structure of human agency.

The Evolved Nest, Virtue, and Vice

2021 ◽  
pp. 87-104
Author(s):  
Darcia Narvaez
Keyword(s):  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Indigenous Communities ◽  
Selfish Gene ◽  
Healthy Development ◽  
Gene Theory ◽  
Human Functioning ◽  
Selfish Gene Theory ◽  
The Right ◽  
And Function

The evolved nest provides an evolved baseline for optimizing species-normal development. Any shift away from the evolved nest should be considered a risk factor. Humans are dynamic complex systems that self-organize according to experience, and whose initial conditions shape subsequent development and function, barring later intervention. The evolved nest provides the type of stimulation and support at the right times and in the right ways for healthy development. Developmental psychological studies are beginning to examine nest components, demonstrating their effects on social and moral capacities. Neurobiological studies demonstrate the effects of evolved nest components on human functioning and disposition. We can also observe the vast difference in personality and culture between societies that provide the evolved nest and those that do not. Traditional Indigenous communities provide the nest and demonstrate the natural development of virtue. When the nest is not provided it represents a broken continuum of support and we should not be surprised that various psychopathologies result that promote individual vice and vicious societies. Industrialized capitalist societies have fostered people unable to fit into the biocommunity as fellow members and then have rationalized the disordered result with anthropocentric fatalistic theories like selfish-gene theory. The evolved nest is critical for restoring human nature to its earth-centric origins as found among our ancestors for millions of years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document