The Future of the Traditional Civil Procedure

2012 ◽  
pp. 67-87
Author(s):  
Petrônio Calmon
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Gascón Inchausti, F., Hess, B. (eds.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure. Cordination or Harmonisation?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1505
Author(s):  
Guillermo Schumann Barragán
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
European Law ◽  
The Future

Este artículo reseña: Gascón Inchausti, F., Hess, B. (eds.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure. Cordination or Harmonisation?, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2020, 290 pp.

scholarly journals Hryniak v. Mauldin Comes to Alberta: Summary Judgment, Culture Shift, and the Future of Civil Trials

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Billingsley
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Past ◽  
Culture Shift ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Future ◽  
Civil Trials ◽  
Summary Judgment

Alberta’s law of civil procedure, and summary judgment in particular, has experienced a culture shift since the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Hryniak v. Mauldin. This article asks whether litigation directed toward a conventional trial is now, or is soon to be, a thing of the past. Although intended to revive traditional trials as a realistic and timely resolution option, it is impossible to say yet if this will be Hryniak’s legacy in Alberta. Three things are clear in post-Hryniak Albertan jurisprudence, however: first, the Hryniak test governs the determination of summary judgment applications in Alberta; second, Alberta courts have embraced the call for proportionality in litigation procedure; and third, the Hryniak culture shift creates uncertainty for Alberta litigants.

scholarly journals Os alimentos provisionais como efetivação do direito aos alimentos e o sistema de tutelas cognitivas de urgência do Novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei nº 13.105/2015) / The brazilian provisional alimonies as realization of the right to alimony and the summary judgment system of the New Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/ 2015)

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Alves de Paula ◽  
Edilberto Marassi Basílio Silveira Junior ◽  
Gabrielle Ota Longo ◽  
Yvete Flávio Da Costa
Keyword(s):  
Child Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judgment Type ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Summary Judgment ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
Present Text

Resumo: Este artigo contém uma análise dos alimentos provisionais como mecanismo jurídico-processual eficaz de tutela do direito aos alimentos, no bojo da sistemática processual civil hodierna, não se olvidando de enfrentar as questões advindas da nova disciplina jurídica das medidas de urgência, inaugurada pela Lei nº 13.105/2015 (Novo Código de Processo Civil). Para tanto, o presente texto, em estudo crítico-doutrinário, perscruta, pormenorizadamente a disciplina jurídica atinente aos alimentos provisionais enquanto modalidade de tutela antecipatória, diferenciando-os dos alimentos provisórios. Disserta acerca das desconcertantes indagações oriundas da desregulamentação das tutelas cognitivas de urgência nominadas promovida pela nova codificação, problematizando suas repercussões sobre o instituto dos alimentos provisionais. Propõe, para cada uma delas, sem desprezar a relevância futura dos contributos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais, possíveis soluções, que prezem pela minimização das dificuldades a serem criadas.Abstract: This article analyses the Brazilian provisional alimony/alimony pendente lite as a procedural realization and a legal mechanism of protection for the rights of alimony, palimony, parental and child support in the wake of contemporary Brazilian civil procedural system, not forgetting to address the issues arising from the new summary judgment legal regulation, inaugurated by Law 13,105/2015 (New Civil Procedure Code). For this purpose, the present text, a critically-doctrinal study, scrutinize in detail the legal regulation pertaining to provisional alimonies while Brazilian anticipatory summary judgment type, distinguishing them from Brazilian provisory alimony. It discusses about the perplexing questions arising from the deregulation of nominated summary judgment system, promoted by the new coding, questioning its impact on the institute of provisional alimonies. It proposes, for each of these questions, without neglecting the future relevance of the doctrinal and jurisprudential contributions, possible solutions, which seek minimizing the difficulties to be created. 

scholarly journals Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in China: Breakthrough and Trend

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Huang
Keyword(s):  
Contemporary Literature ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Current Debate ◽  
The Future ◽  
Recognition And Enforcement ◽  
Future Direction ◽  
Judicial Recognition

Chinese Civil Procedure Law (CPL) provides that foreign judgments can be recognised and enforced according to reciprocity if no treaty is applicable. However, although Chinese judgments have been recognised and enforced in many countries without a treaty, China had never reciprocated before 2016. Since 2016, Chinese courts unprecedentedly recognised and enforced foreign monetary judgments based on de facto reciprocity. This spurs rich literature with mixed views about the future direction of reciprocity-based judicial recognition and enforcement (JRE) in China. This post aims to add to the current debate from two aspects. First, it tries to answer the doubts in contemporary literature about whether the two foreign judgments recognised and enforced in 2016 and 2017 are fortuitous. Second, it addresses the question of what the trend of the Chinese reciprocity-based JRE law might be.

ON THE POWER OF JUDGE’S ASSISTANTS TO ISSUE ORDERS – COMMENTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 47(2) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (XX) ◽  
pp. 201-214
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Partyk
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Future ◽  
Future Consequences

The judge’s assistant is a lawyer who prepares proposals for the judge and helps them in the process of organising their work. Due to a change in the civil procedural rules, they are now able to issue certain types of orders. In my paper, I would like to try to answer the question of what type of cases such orders may be issued in, as well as to assess the future consequences of the change in law. The key question also arises; should judge’s assistants be able to issue such orders? Should it not be reserved for judges only?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document