scholarly journals Interactive epistemology II: Probability

1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Aumann
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Epistemology

scholarly journals Interactive epistemology in simple dynamic games with a continuum of strategies

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 737-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Battigalli ◽  
Pietro Tebaldi
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Games ◽  
Interactive Epistemology

How canonical is the canonical model? A comment on Aumann's interactive epistemology

1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviad Heifetz
Keyword(s):  
Canonical Model ◽  
Interactive Epistemology

scholarly journals Introduction: Interactive Epistemology

Episteme ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Weirich
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Epistemology

Agreeing to Disagree with Conditional Probability Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Tsakas
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Conditional Probability ◽  
Dynamic Games ◽  
Interactive Epistemology ◽  
Agreeing To Disagree ◽  
Conditioning Event

Abstract In this note, we extend Aumann’s agreement theorem to a framework where beliefs are modelled by conditional probability systems à la Battigalli, P., and M. Siniscalchi. 1999. “Hierarchies of Conditional Beliefs and Interactive Epistemology in Dynamic Games.” Journal of Economic Theory 88: 188–230. We prove two independent generalizations of the agreement theorem, one where the agents share some common conditioning event, and one where they may not.

scholarly journals Interactive epistemology in games with payoff uncertainty

2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Battigalli ◽  
Marciano Siniscalchi
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Epistemology ◽  
Payoff Uncertainty

scholarly journals The power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemology

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Brandenburger
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Epistemology ◽  
Recent Developments

scholarly journals Interactive Epistemology and Solution Concepts for Games with Asymmetric Information

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Battigalli ◽  
Alfredo Di Tillio ◽  
Edoardo Grillo ◽  
Antonio Penta
Keyword(s):  
Asymmetric Information ◽  
Solution Concepts ◽  
Interactive Epistemology

scholarly journals Interactive epistemology I: Knowledge

1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Aumann
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Epistemology

scholarly journals More about the same: children's understanding of post-articles

1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Development ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Problem Area ◽  
Interactive Epistemology ◽  
Children’S Behaviour

ABSTRACTAn experiment on children between 2; 0 and 7; 0 showed that they initially interpret the same X to mean ‘same kind’ in contexts where it actually means ‘same one’. This led to a critical evaluation of Piaget's implicit contention that young children are using determiners anaphorically. Stress is placed on the linguistic rather than conceptual component of children's behaviour in experiments involving questions of the type: Is it the same X? It is argued that language is not only the tool of intelligence for representing ongoing cognitive development, but that it is also a problem area for children within its own right. It is suggested that the importance of young children's processing procedures on the linguistic environment has hitherto been underestimated in Piaget's interactive epistemology.

FORMAL EPISTEMOLOGY, CONTEXT AND CONTENT: INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL ISSUE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FORMAL EPISTEMOLOGY

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-401
Author(s):  
HORACIO ARLÓ-COSTA
Keyword(s):  
Recent Work ◽  
Formal Epistemology ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Interactive Epistemology ◽  
Semantic Framework ◽  
Logical Models ◽  
Formal Philosophy ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Epistemic Context

This special issue presents a series of articles focusing on recent work in formal epistemology and formal philosophy. The articles in the latter category elaborate on the notion of context and content and their relationships. This work is not unrelated to recent developments in formal epistemology. Logical models of context, when connected with the representation of epistemic context, are clearly relevant for many issues considered by formal epistemologists. For example, the semantic framework Joe Halpern uses in his article for this issue has been applied elsewhere to solve problems in interactive epistemology (which can be seen as an active branch of contemporary formal epistemology).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document