Multiplanar fracture reducer versus manual traction in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nails

Author(s):  
Kuo Zhao ◽  
Junzhe Zhang ◽  
Zhongzheng Wang ◽  
Yuchuan Wang ◽  
Junyong Li ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Woo Il Kim ◽  
Ik Soo Choi ◽  
Seung Ho Lee ◽  
Young Doo Kim

2011 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Thelen ◽  
Marcel Betsch ◽  
Jan-Peter Grassmann ◽  
Vera Spoor ◽  
Christian Eichler ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 487-491
Author(s):  
Adnan Zubair ◽  
Eric M. Samuelson ◽  
Randal P. Morris ◽  
Mark Foreman ◽  
Johann A. Gagnon-Bartsch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. E371-E376
Author(s):  
Marc Swiontkowski ◽  
David Teague ◽  
Sheila Sprague ◽  
Sofia Bzovsky ◽  
Diane Heels-Ansdell ◽  
...  

Background: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone injury, with a reported annual incidence of more than 75 000 in the United States. This study aimed to determine whether patients with tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nails experience a lower rate of reoperation if treated at higher-volume hospitals, or by higher-volume or more experienced surgeons. Methods: The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) was a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation to promote fracture union, treat infection or preserve the limb in patients with open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. Using data from SPRINT, we quantified centre and surgeon volumes into quintiles. We performed analyses adjusted for type of fracture (open v. closed), type of injury (isolated v. multitrauma), gender and age for the primary outcome of reoperation using multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were no significant differences in the odds of reoperation between high- and low-volume centres (p = 0.9). Overall, surgeon volume significantly affected the odds of reoperation (p = 0.03). The odds of reoperation among patients treated by moderate-volume surgeons were 50% less than those among patients treated by verylow-volume surgeons (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.88), and the odds of reoperation among patients treated by high-volume surgeons were 47% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.93). Conclusion: There appears to be no significant additional patient benefit in treatment by a higher-volume centre for intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Additional research on the effects of surgical and clinical site volume in tibial shaft fracture management is needed to confirm this finding. The odds of reoperation were higher in patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons; this finding may be used to optimize the results of tibial shaft fracture management. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00038129


1994 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 1063-1065
Author(s):  
Shinji Izumi ◽  
Kazumori Arimura ◽  
Keiji Shiroma ◽  
Hirohumi Sasaoka ◽  
Jiro Okada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document