scholarly journals Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and relapse in patients with clinical stage IS testicular cancer

Author(s):  
Maximilian Peter Brandt ◽  
C. Ruf ◽  
K. P. Dieckmann ◽  
I. Syring ◽  
C. Ruckes ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Clinical stage I (CSI) testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represents disease confined to the testis without metastasis and CSIS is defined as persistently elevated tumor markers (TM) after orchiectomy, indicating subclinical metastatic disease. This study aims at assessing clinical characteristics and oncological outcome in CSIS. Methods Data from five tertiary referring centers in Germany were screened. We defined correct classification of CSIS according to EAU guidelines. TM levels, treatment and relapse-free survival were assessed and differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, correct/incorrect CSIS) were analyzed with Fisher’s exact and Chi-square test. Results Out of 2616 TGCT patients, 43 (1.6%) were CSIS. Thereof, 27 were correctly classified (cCSIS, 1.03%) and 16 incorrectly classified (iCSIS). TMs that defined cCSIS were in 12 (44.4%), 10 (37%), 3 (11.1%) and 2 (7.4%) patients AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH, respectively. In the cCSIS group, six patients were seminoma and 21 non-seminoma. Treatment consisted of active surveillance, carboplatin-mono AUC7 and BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin). No difference between cCSIS and iCSIS with respect to applied chemotherapy was found (p = 0.830). 5-year relapse-free survival was 88.9% and three patients (11%) in the cCSIS group relapsed. All underwent salvage treatment (3xBEP) with no documented death. Conclusion Around 1% of all TGCT were classified as cCSIS patients. Identification of cCSIS is of critical importance to avoid disease progression and relapses by adequate treatment. We report a high heterogeneity of treatment patterns, associated with excellent long-term survival irrespective of the initial treatment approach.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Pia Paffenholz ◽  
Tim Nestler ◽  
Yasmine Maatoug ◽  
Melanie von Brandenstein ◽  
Barbara Köditz ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The impact of teratomatous elements in orchiectomy specimens of metastasized testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) regarding oncological outcome is still unclear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective analysis including 146 patients with metastasized TGCT analysing patient characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-six (18%) of all patients showed teratomatous elements in the orchiectomy specimens. TGCT with teratomatous elements showed a significantly higher frequency of clinical-stage 2C-3 disease (73 vs. 49%, <i>p</i> = 0.031), visceral metastases (58 vs. 32%, <i>p</i> = 0.015), and poor prognosis (<i>p</i> = 0.011) than TGCT without teratomatous elements. Teratoma-containing TGCT revealed a significantly higher rate of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND, 54 vs. 32%, <i>p</i> = 0.041), with teratomatous elements being more often present in the PC-RPLND specimens (43 vs. 11%, <i>p</i> = 0.020) than nonteratoma-containing primaries. In the Kaplan-Meier estimates, the presence of teratomatous elements in orchiectomy specimens was associated with a significantly reduced relapse-free survival (RFS) (<i>p</i> = 0.049) during a median follow-up of 36 months (10–115.5). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The presence of teratomatous elements in orchiectomy specimens is associated with an advanced tumor stage, worse treatment response as well as a reduced RFS in metastasized TGCT. Consequently, the presence of teratomatous elements might act as a reliable stratification tool for treatment decision in TGCT patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5052-5052
Author(s):  
Maximilian Peter Johannes Karl Brandt ◽  
Christian Guido Ruf ◽  
Klaus Peter Dieckmann ◽  
Isabella Syring ◽  
Christian Ruckes ◽  
...  

5052 Background: Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) in clinical stage I (CSI) are tumors confined to the testis without evidence of metastasis. Around 50% of all TGCT patients present with elevated serum tumor markers (TM) such as alpha-feto protein (AFP), beta-humanochoriongonadotropin (ß-HCG) and lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH). After ablatio testis, TMs usually return to normal according to half-life kinetics, however, in clinical stage IS (CSIS) TMs remain elevated or increase after surgery. Follow-up data on CSIS is scarce and our study aims to assess clinical characteristics and oncologic outcomes in a large TGCT cohort. Methods: In this multicenter study we collected data from 5 tertiary referring hospitals in Germany, included patients with CSIS and evaluated TM levels, treatment and the primary outcome relapse-free survival. False CSIS was defined as documented CSIS but TMs that returned to normal after respective half-life kinetics. Differences between predefined groups (chemotherapy, TM, true/false CSIS) was analyzed with fisher’s exact and chi-square test. Results: Overall, 2616 patient data files were analyzed. Forty-three patients (1.6%) were documented as CSIS of which 27 (63%) were true and 16 (37%) false CSIS. Six (14%) had seminomas and 37 (86%) non-seminomas. In the true CSIS group AFP, ß-HCG, AFP plus ß-HCG and LDH were elevated in 13, 6, 3 and 2 cases. Four true CSIS patients received surveillance, 21 had 3x or 2x courses of BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and 2 carboplatin. Within the false CSIS group, 2 patients were treated with surveillance, 10 received 3x BEP, one 3x PEI (cisplatin, etoposide and ifosfamid) and 3 had carboplatin. Chi-Square test revealed no difference between true or false CSIS classification in respect to application of chemotherapy (any chemotherapy, p = 0.83). Relapse-free survival after 5 and 10 years was 88.9% and 77.8%, respectively. Three patients in the true CSIS group relapsed (2 seminomas had carboplatin, 1 non-seminoma had surveillance). All relapses were treated with 3 courses of BEP with no documented death in the CSIS population. Conclusions: Overall, less than 2% of all TGCT were documented CSIS of which 37% were falsely classified. We report a high proportion of relapse-free survival in CSIS treated with surveillance or BEP with a high heterogeneity in treatment patterns. Correct classification of CSIS remains of critical importance to avoid toxicity for patients that could be safely treated with surveillance.


2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finn Edler von Eyben ◽  
Ebbe Lindegaard Madsen ◽  
Ole Blaabjerg ◽  
Per Hyltoft Petersen ◽  
Hans von der Maase ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (45) ◽  
pp. 1824-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Ádám Jóna ◽  
Zsófia Simon ◽  
Miklós Udvardy ◽  
Zsófia Miltényi

Introduction: Hodgkin lymphoma is a curable lymphoma with an 80–90% long-term survival, however, 30% of the patients develop relapse. Only half of relapsed patients can be cured with autologous stem cell transplantation. Aim: The aim of the authors was to analyze survival rates and incidence of relapses among Hodgkin lymphoma patients who were treated between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2014. Novel therapeutic options are also summarized. Method: Retrospective analysis of data was performed. Results: A total of 715 patients were treated (382 men and 333 women; median age at the time of diagnosis was 38 years). During the studied period the frequency of relapsed patients was reduced from 24.87% to 8.04%. The numbers of autologous stem cell transplantations was increased among refracter/relapsed patients, and 75% of the patients underwent transplantation since 2000. The 5-year overall survival improved significantly (between 1980 and 1989 64.4%, between 1990 and 1999 82.4%, between 2000 and 2009 88.4%, and between 2010 and 2014 87.1%). Relapse-free survival did not change significantly. Conclusions: During the study period treatment outcomes improved. For relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients novel treatment options may offer better chance for cure. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(45), 1824–1833.


1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariël E. Gels ◽  
Jan Marrink ◽  
Petra Visser ◽  
Dirk Th. Sleijfer ◽  
Jos H. J. Droste ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 579-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Albers ◽  
Thomas M. Ulbright ◽  
Jutta Albers ◽  
Greg A. Miller ◽  
Attilio Orazi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18726-e18726
Author(s):  
Aparna Sharma ◽  
Bivas Biswas ◽  
Rohit Reddy ◽  
Robin Thumbudorai ◽  
Sandip Ganguly ◽  
...  

e18726 Background: Mediastinal germ cell tumor (MGCT) is a rare entity and comprises 10-15% of all mediastinal tumors. We describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of MGCT treated at two tertiary care centres in India. Methods: Patients diagnosed with GCT (any site) at two large tertiary care centres from January 2010 to December 2020 in India were identified using the ICD-09 code (C-62) from prospectively kept databases. From these databases, a manual search was performed to identify MGCT patients. A chart review was done to retrieve demographic, tumor-related (serum tumor marker levels as per International germ cell cancer consensus (IGCCC)) and treatment details. Relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared for seminomatous and non-seminomatous MGCT. Results: A total of 54 patients were identified and all were males with a median age of 25 years (interquartile range, 18-45). Common presenting symptoms included cough (81.4%) shortness of breath (64.8%), chest pain (25.9%), superior vena cava obstruction (20.3%), pleural effusion (18.5%) and pericardial effusion (5.6%). Approximately one-thirds (n = 17) were seminomatous, while two-thirds were non-seminomatous (n = 37). Serum tumors markers levels were S0 (7.4%),S1 (42.6%),S2 (29.6%) and S3 (20.4%). Treatment was primarily by multiagent chemotherapy [ Bleomycin/Etoposide/cisplatin(BEP) 63.0%, EP (Etoposide/Cisplatin) 18.5%, VIP (etoposide/ifosfamide/cisplatin) 13.0%). Median number of cycles administered was 3 (Range 1-6). Three patients did not receive chemotherapy (all seminoma) and were treated with upfront surgery. In total, 11 patients (20.4%) underwent surgery, and eight (14.8%) received radiation. Three patients were not evaluable for response, 33.3% achieved complete response (CR),44.4% achieved partial response (PR), 9.3% had SD (stable disease) and 7.4% progressed on first line chemotherapy. Median follow up was 14.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.03 -26.16). Three year relapse free survival was 64.0% in overall population, and 100% in seminoma vs 41.5% in non-seminoma (P < 0.001). Three year OS was 80.2% in all patients and 94.1% for seminoma versus 70.0% in non-seminoma (P = 0.178). Conclusions: In this largest real-world analysis of MGCT, we found excellent long-term survival rates for patients with seminomatous MGCT, while further optimization of treatment is needed for those with non-seminomatous MGCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document