Efficacy and safety of transconjunctival scleral flap resuturing for hypotony after glaucoma filtering surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 246 (12) ◽  
pp. 1751-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Maruyama ◽  
Shiroaki Shirato
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Consuelo Gutiérrez-Ortiz ◽  
Eduardo Vleming ◽  
Jesus Pareja ◽  
Miguel A. Teus

Purpose To evaluate the long-term morphologic changes in the anterior segment structures after nonpenetrating filtering surgery (NPFS) supplemented with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and no scleral implant using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods Thirteen eyes of 13 consecutive patients who underwent NPFS with intraoperative 5-FU under the conjunctiva and the scleral flap and no implant were evaluated in an observational nonrandomized, consecutive case series study conducted 2 years postoperatively. Patients were assessed for the presence of a subconjunctival filtering bleb, the volume of an intrascleral cavity, and a suprachoroidal hypoechoic area. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively at the time of UBM. Results The IOP decreased significantly (p=0.01) from 24±7.6 mmHg to 13.7±4.1 mmHg. In most patients (69.2%), the postoperative IOP decreased at least 30% from the preoperative value without medications and in 84.6% with medication. UBM showed a subconjunctival empty space in 92.3% of eyes. In 84.6% of patients, an intrascleral cavity was seen, the mean volume of which was 1.68 mm3 (range, 0–4.07). We found a negative correlation between the height, width, and volume of the intrascleral lake and the IOP. In 92.3% of eyes, a hypoechoic area in the suprachoroidal space also was seen. Conclusions UBM showed a filtering intrascleral cavity, subconjunctival filtering bleb, and a suprachoroidal space after NPFS supplemented with 5-FU under the conjunctiva and the scleral flap without an implant.


2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio De Feo ◽  
Alessandro Bagnis ◽  
Graziano Bricola ◽  
Riccardo Scotto ◽  
Carlo Enrico Traverso

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Figus ◽  
Chiara Posarelli ◽  
Francesco Nasini ◽  
Giamberto Casini ◽  
Paolo Martinelli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard A. Lewis

Canaloplasty is a surgical approach for patients with open-angle glaucoma. The objective of the procedure is to enhance circumferential outflow of aqueous from Schlemm’s canal to the collector system, improving outflow without creating a filtering bleb. In the procedure, a microcatheter is threaded into the canal using a standard nonpenetrating approach and then passed for 360 degrees. A polypropylene suture is attached to the catheter. The catheter is then retracted 360 degrees during which time viscodilation is performed. The suture remains in the canal, and the ends of the suture are tied together to place constant tension upon the trabecular meshwork (TM). Theoretically, the tension results in opening of the TM, improving outflow and lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). The procedure has increased in popularity and may be a valuable option for patients with open-angle glaucoma who might be at high risk for filtering surgery complications, such as contact lens wearers, patients on blood thinners, and those patients who already failed filtering surgery in the other eye. With the increased popularity of canaloplasty, knowing how to prevent and manage complications of this procedure are crucial skills for today’s glaucoma surgeon. The notion of enhancing circumferential outflow arose from studies of an earlier nonpenetrating procedure, viscocanalostomy (see Chapter 52). In this procedure, a Descemet’s membrane window is created under a scleral flap, and the outflow system is dilated with viscoelastic for 1–2 clock hours. However, in canaloplasty, 360-degree viscodilation is performed, and a tensioning suture is left in Schlemm’s canal to promote canal distension and aqueous outflow. Passing the microcatheter and completing a successful canaloplasty requires specific steps and careful attention to detail. The procedure may be performed under local, regional, or general anesthesia. Fixation of the globe is the first step, using either a corneal or rectus suture. Then, a half-thickness, 4 mm limbus-based scleral flap is created, followed by a deeper scleral flap, which unroofs the canal. The dissection is then taken forward onto Descemet’s membrane to allow for creation of a Descemet’s window, and the deep flap is excised. Schlemm’s canal is next catheterized 360 degrees.


Eye ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 784-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Varma ◽  
R Sihota ◽  
H C Agarwal

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A572-A572
Author(s):  
F JABOLI ◽  
E RODA ◽  
C FABBRI ◽  
S MARCHETTO ◽  
F FERRARA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document