Single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a series of 116 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Seung Kim ◽  
Han-Gil Kim ◽  
Seung Yoon Yang ◽  
Yoon Dae Han ◽  
Hyuk Hur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Appendiceal Mucocele

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Techniques

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 348-350
Author(s):  
KS Johal ◽  
P Tsim ◽  
A Redfern ◽  
C Weeks ◽  
HM Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Operative Morbidity ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Surgical Site Complications ◽  
Gain Access

Single-Incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a relatively novel technique that employs a single incision to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy include reduction of port site complications, reduced pain and improved cosmesis. Given that the incidence of surgical site complications in conventional laparoscopic surgery (infection 0.5%, incisional hernia 7.9%, haematoma 6.25%) are all correlated directly with the incisional site, a reduction in the number of incisions has been suggested as a means of improving post-operative morbidity from laparoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Short-term clinical and oncological outcomes after single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a retrospective clinical analysis of 30 cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 030006052110196
Author(s):  
Ze-Jian Wu ◽  
Xiang-Wu Huang ◽  
Jia-He Yu ◽  
Hui-Zhong Lin ◽  
Feng-Wu Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Radical Resection ◽  
Clinical Analysis ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Open Operation

Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic surgery+1 (SILS+1) radical resection of sigmoid and upper rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 30 consecutive patients with sigmoid and upper rectal cancer who underwent SILS+1 radical resection between October 2018 and January 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. An initial 5-cm periumbilical transverse incision was made. Then, a multiport device was placed in the umbilical incision. Two 10-mm ports were used for laparoscope insertion, and the other two ports were used for laparoscope device insertion. A 12-mm trocar was placed in the right lower abdominal quadrant under laparoscopic view and served as the surgeon’s dominant operating channel. Results All operations were performed successfully without conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open operation. Three patients developed postoperative complications: one patient developed ileus, one developed postoperative bleeding, and one developed wound infection. There were no perioperative deaths. Conclusions The safety and feasibility of SILS+1 radical resection of sigmoid and upper rectal cancer was established by experienced surgeons in our study. However, further studies are needed to demonstrate the advantages of this procedure compared with the benefits of conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document